Monday, October 20, 2014

D.A. Carson on Matthew 26:29

Common to all three of the Synoptic Gospels, Jesus tells his apostles that he will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the coming of the Kingdom (Matt 26:29; 14:25; Luke 22:18). In LDS theology, Christ, when he comes again, will partake of what scholars call the “Messianic Banquet,” and that is something in the future (part-and-parcel of LDS premillennialism). This can be seen in D&C 27:5:

Behold, it is wisdom in me; wherefore, marvel not, for the hour cometh that I will drink of the fruit of the vine with you on the earth . . .

There has also been some nonsense comments from some Catholic apologists on this, stating that Jesus drank the “cup of consummation” at the cross and that is what Christ meant by “it is finished/done” in John 19:30 (Scott Hahn and Peter D. Williams follow this flawed argument; fellow Catholic apologists such as Fr. Mitchell Pacwa and Robert Sungenis have argued against this novel interpretation of the Last Supper).

D.A. Carson in page 539 of his commentary on Matthew, offers the following exegesis of Matt 26:29:


The four cups were meant to correspond to the fourfold promise of Exodus 6:6-7. The third cup, the “cup of blessing” used by Jesus in the words of institution, is thus associated with redemption (Exod 6:6); but the fourth cup corresponds to the promise “I will take you as my own people, and I will be your God” (Exod 6:7). Thus Jesus is simultaneously not to drink the cup of consummation, the cup that promises the divine presence, till the kingdom of all its fullness has been ushered in. Then he will drink the cup with his people. This is a veiled farewell and implies a sustained absence . . .The Lord’s Supper, therefore points both to the past and to the future, both to Jesus’ sacrifice at Calvary and to the messianic banquet.