Response to Robert Bowman, part 3: Bibliography on Elohim and Genesis 1:1 in the King Follett Discourse

This is part 3 of a response to Robert Bowman; part 1 can be read here; part 2 can be read here.

The following are articles by Latter-day Saint apologists and scholars discussing the meaning of elohim (and the related concept of the "plurality of the Gods" doctrine) and Joseph Smith’s approach to Gen 1:1 in the King Follett Discourse:

Kevin L. Barney, Joseph Smith's Emendation of Hebrew Genesis 1:1

Idem. Examining Six Key Concepts in Joseph Smith's Understanding of Genesis 1:1

Robert Boylan, Genesis 20:13 and the "Plurality of the Gods"

Idem. NET on Genesis 20:13

Idem. J.P. Holding Fails on Genesis 20:13

David E. Bokovoy, "Ye Really Are Gods:" A Response to Michael heiser Concerning the LDS Use of Psalm 82 and the Gospel of John

Daniel C. Peterson, Daniel C. Peterson, Ye are Gods: Psalm 82 and John 10 as Witnesses of the Divine Nature of Humankind

John A. Tvedtnes, The King Follett Discourse in the Light of Ancient and Medieval Jewish and Christian Beliefs

Allen Hansen, Joseph Smith and the Beginning

Daniel O. McClellan, Elohim does not mean "Judges"

Idem. An Exegetical Reading of Psalm 82

Idem. Psalm 82 in Contemporary Latter-day Saint Tradition

Ben McGuire, Reconsidering Psalms 82:6:Judges or Gods? A Proposal