Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Response to the Reformed Claim that is God Desires Someone to be Saved, They Must and Will be Saved


In response to a common argument in favour of Calvinism, Ronnie Rogers, himself a former Calvinist, wrote:

. ..some Calvinists maintain if God truly desires all to be saved, and all are not saved, then failed. No! God seems perfectly capable of creating a plan that affords everyone the magnanimous opportunity to be saved while simultaneously desiring that such plan encompass libertarian free will, the ability to resist. To wit, there is neither a biblical nor logical conflict in God desiring everyone to accept his love and salvation, while concurrently desiring that such acceptance is conditioned upon a non-deterministic free will decision.

We see this parallel frequently throughout Scripture. For example, God both designed and desires marriage to be for life (Gen. 2:18-24; Mal 2:16; Matt 19:8). Yet he also quite apparently desires to permit the freedom of those involved to choose to go against his desire to permit the freedom of those involved to choose to go against his desire for marriage (Matt 5:31-32; 17:7-8; 1Cor 7:10-16). Similarly, Scripture is clear that God desires for all Christians to grow in the knowledge and holiness of Christ (Eph 4:15; 1Pet 2:2). However, what we find in Scripture and the local church is the clear reality that God also desired to incorporate choice, which can result in some being unnecessarily immature and even remain so for long periods of time (1Cor 3:1-3).

Does this mean God is not omnipotent? No, it means God created man with otherwise choice, which includes the God-granted freedom to actually choose between following or not following God. With this in mind, the reality is some people freely choose to remain immature, or they choose not to do the things that lead to maturity (such as regular Bible study, regular evangelism, regular prayer, and regular meetings with other believers) . . . Part of Calvinism’s difficulty in grasping this is their commitment to decretal theology and compatibilism, which necessitates that every event is actually a predetermined event. It is, in fact, a necessary event because God decreed everything to be as it is, even though they confusingly speak, write, and pray as though the events could be otherwise due to human involvement. This determinative necessity does not require exclusion of secondary causes, but rather that the event takes place as only it could take place. In contrast, Extensivism recognizes that some events are definite because they happen necessarily due to God’s predetermination that such is the case without any possibility the event could happen differently Such events are unaffected by human choice. Events like creation, the second coming of Christ, and the final judgment of God against all ungodliness are examples of this. (Ronnie W. Rogers, Does Love All or Some? Comparing Biblical Extensivism and Calvinism's Exclusivism [Eugene, Oreg.: Wipf and Stock, 2019], 174, 175)

 For further reading, see: