I started
browsing through the blog of Luis Dizon (Catholic revert). While I disagree
with him on many issues, I have to agree with much of his criticism of Talmage’s
Great Apostasy (a very dated work)
and other naïve criticisms of “mainstream” (esp. Roman Catholic) Christianity.
He has a
very good post on a topic I have discussed in great detail:
This is a
response to Protestant Michael Heiser on 1 Pet 3:21 and whether it teaches
baptismal regeneration (it does).
I myself
have addressed this text in some detail at:
Refuting Douglas Wilson on Water Baptism and Salvation (cf. Chad Pierce on the Salvific Efficacy of Water Baptism; Flood Typology and Participation in 1 Peter and Jean Daniélou on Flood Typology and Water Baptism)
Other relevant posts include the following:
Acts 10:47, Cornelius, and Baptismal Regeneration (cf. Does Cornelius Help Refute Baptismal Regeneration? and. Was Cornelius Converted Before Acts 10?)
On the related issue of imputed righteousness (which informs a lot of the errant arguments against baptismal regeneration and other doctrines), see: