Monday, August 24, 2020

Teresa and Arthur Beem on the Prophecies of William Miller and Ellen G. White

 

Teresa and Arthur Beem are former SDAs who are now Roman Catholics. They wrote an interesting book, It’s Okay Not to be a Seventh-Day Adventist which contained a very good discussion of the “Investigative Judgment” and how, being honest, it is an absolutely ghastly doctrine with no biblical or historical foundation at all. They also had a number of chapters refuting the SDA understanding of the Sabbath vis-à-vis the New Covenant.

 

In the book, they had a discussion of William Miller’s failed 1844 prophecy and some failed prophecies of Ellen G. White. I represent them here as a contrast to the contingent prophecies one finds in the Bible (e.g., Mic 3:12 [cf. Jer 26:18-19] and those of Joseph Smith [see Resources on Joseph Smith’s Prophecies]):

 

Was Miller Another Jonah?

 

Adventists argue that Miller’s prophecy about 1844 was like Jonah’s. It was a conditional prophecy; its fulfillment resting on the obedience or disobedience of its audience. But are the two scenarios alike? A comparison shows that Miller denied God had commanded him to preach; Jonah was commanded. Nineveh was spared because of the genuine repentance; the relieved people glorified God. When the people of God repented and listened to Miller, there was only tragedy and disappointment—loss of faith, even suicides. Why would God punish those who had sincerely turned to Him and given all for Him? Miller’s prophecy did not bring glory to God.

 

Jonah never recanted that God had spoken to him and given him a message. Miller and many of his followers agreed that they had been mistaken.

 

There is yet a greater message in the story of Jonah that gives a specific purpose for God’s wrath not to have been poured out upon the Ninevites. Jonah was a symbol of Christ. The three days and nights in the tomb of darkness were the ante-type (precursory symbol) of Christ’s experience in the tomb. Repentant Nineveh, symbolizing the gentiles, was spared the damning prophecy just as the new Covenant of grace is extended to the gentiles after the cross. This broader meaning of this story is the purpose of the unfulfilled prophecy of wrath. The Great Disappointment had no broader message than pain. (Teresa Beem and Arthur Beem, It’s Okay Not to be a Seventh-Day Adventist: The Doctrine that Attempts to Repair the Temple Veil [North Charleston, S.C.: BookSurge Publishing, 2008], 49)

 

 

 

Several of Ellen’s predictions failed. Most apologists for Ellen will tell you that her prophecies did not come true because they were conditional prophecies like Jonah’s warning to Nineveh (Note: they already used that excuse for Millers’ failed prophecy). This in no way can cover all of Ellen’s failed prophecies. Also, White proponents mitigate her mistakes with the anticipatory “they just haven’t occurred yet.” You can easily see that excuse could linger forever. Below are a few of the faulty premonitory visions:

 

Pestilence. “Soon the dead and dying will be all around us” (Present Truth, Sept. 1849, p. 10). That prophecy was made in 1849. We are not aware, nor is any reference in history that there was a mass pestilence during that time.

 

New Dates. Lucinda Burdick, Ellen’s friend, recorded that the prophetess made more predictions of apocalyptic dates following the disappointment of 1844. These are not found among Ellen’s published writings by the SDA church, but can be found in the Advent Christian Publishing Society. Burdick claims Ellen told her that God said He would come in June of 1845. When that date again failed, she declared the vision had been in the “language of Canaan” and she had misunderstood—the real date was September of that year. Again, failure. Then came the year 1856 prediction that failed. Ellen finally gave up date setting. Ellen warned Lucinda Burdick that they would soon meet with trouble and be thrown in prisons when they visited the coast of Maine. When that did not happen, many of Ellen’s supporters began to doubt the validity of her visions (Grant, Miles, Examination of Mrs. Ellen White’s Visions. Advent Christian Publication Society, Boston, 1877).

 

Time Short. “I saw that the time for Jesus to be in the most holy place was nearly finished, and that time can last but a very little longer” (Early Writings 58). An angel told her in 1850 that “Time is almost finished-get ready, get ready, get ready.” She was also shown that in a matter of months the seven last plagues would begin (Early Writings 64, 67).

 

Appearance at Slave Emancipation. In an early vison Ellen wrote she saw the black slaves received their freedom at the same time as the Second Coming (Early Writings 35). She also claimed that in vision God told her the slaveholder will be held accountable for his slave’s sins. “God cannot take to heaven the salve who has been kept in ignorance and degradation, knowing nothing of God and the Bible, fearing nothing but his master’s lash, and holding a lower position than the brutes. But he does the best thing for him that a compassionate God can do. He permits him to be as if he had not been” (Early Writings 276). (So why is God freeing them at the Second Coming then?)

 

If Adventists truly believe Ellen’s prediction, that would cut down considerably the number of people who could be in heaven. Throughout history most civilizations have had slaves. The Israelites were slaves in Egypt, Babylon and during the Roman Empire. Perhaps she just meant hat God could not save the American black slave. Again, the White apologists call this a conditional prophecy.

 

Slavery in the South. “Slavery will again be revived in the Southern States; for the spirit of slavery still lives. Therefore it will not do for those who labor among the colored people to preach the truth as boldly and openly as they would be free to do in other places” (Spalding and Mann Collection 23). Adventists respond that she is speaking symbolically and that the attitude of the slavery will return to the south. But she is speaking of a literal taking of the Three Angels’ Message to southern blacks. The Sabbath Message that could not be kept by a slave who had no freedom to rest would bind them in guilt. She was against giving the new Sabbath Message to the southern slave.

 

Literal slavery has not returned—symbolic slavery is everywhere with everyone. So again, this [is] a false prophecy.

 

Food for Worms. This specious divination if the best known among Adventists. “I was shown the company present at the Conference. Said the angel, ‘Some food for worms, some subjects of the seven last plagues, some will be alive and remain upon the earth to be translated at the coming of Jesus’” (Testimonies for the Church 131/32 and Spiritual Gifts 208.2). Penned in 1856, we can say with assurance that everyone attending that conference is now officially, “food for worms.” None of them saw the seven last plagues, unless you want to argue the state of the dead and say that they are all now in heaven and will see the seven last plagues, which would put Ellen in a worse predicament as far as the Adventist soul sleep doctrine.

 

We have often heard people excuse this prophecy by saying that she related what she saw at the Second Coming and it just appeared that some stayed alive to see it. The problem is that Ellen is not recording what she saw but what the angel said. He told her, “some will be alive and remain upon the earth to be translated at the coming of Jesus.” Someone here is suspect of giving false information because they all died. We must ask, did Ellen see the devil who “masquerades as an angel of light?” (2 Corinthians 11:14).

 

There are also guardians of the White legacy who would suggest that this vision was a conditional one. But if you look at the context there are no words that suggest that the angel was speaking based upon any conditions that needed to be met. (Ibid., 90-92)

 

 On the issue of Seventh-day Adventism, I have not discussed that group in much detail. However, for a response to an anti-LDS book by a SDA author where I address the topics of anthropology and eschatology, see:


Response to Douglas V. Pond on Biblical and LDS Anthropology and Eschatology