Monday, November 16, 2020

Irenaeus’ Interpretation of Luke 16:16 not being “pro-Sola Scriptura”


Since, then, the law originated with Moses, it terminated with John as a necessary consequence. Christ had come to fulfil it: wherefore “the law and the prophets were” with them “until John.” And therefore Jerusalem, taking its commencement from David, and fulfilling its own times, must have an end of legislation when the new covenant was revealed. For God does all things by measure and in order; nothing is unmeasured with Him, because nothing is out of order. Well spake he, who said that the unmeasurable Father was Himself subjected to measure in the Son; for the Son is the measure of the Father, since He also comprehends Him. But that the administration of them (the Jews) was temporary, Esaias says: “And the daughter of Zion shall be left as a cottage in a vineyard, and as a lodge in a garden of cucumbers.” And when shall these things be left behind? Is it not when the fruit shall be taken away, and the leaves alone shall be left, which now have no power of producing fruit? (Against Heresies, 4.4.2)

 

Notice that Irenaeus understood Luke 16:16 as a statement of how the Law of Moses was binding upon God’s people until John the Baptist, not a statement that prophets/prophecy ceased with John the Baptist.

 

Further Reading

 

Not by Scripture Alone: A Latter-day Saint Refutation of Sola Scriptura