Thursday, May 6, 2021

Frederick J. Pack on The Bible's Silence about the Manner of Man's Origin

Writing in 1924 in a book published by The Deseret News, Frederick J. Pack demonstrated more intellectual honesty and integrity than a certain braindead hack who is currently demonstrating, apart from his failures as a human being, his failures about science and scripture, too:  


Concerning the manner of man’s origin, however, the Biblical account is remarkably quiet. The narrative simply states that man was formed from the dust, but of the particular way in which this was done it leaves the reader uninformed. The Biblical statement, in its literal form, might be interpreted with equal justification to mean either that man was moulded from the dust or that he descended through procreation. There is no justification, however, for the belief that the term formed, as used in this connection, can mean nothing but moulded.

 

It is not an uncommon practice on the part of theologians, who hold the “plastic clay” idea of the origin of man, to refer to this particular interpretation as the “Biblical account of the creation” and to denounce anyone as an unbeliever who does not subscribe to the identical meaning thus placed upon it. As a matter of fact, the Bible is wholly silent as to the precise manner of man’s origin. This same attitude is also assumed by some of the theologians who do not believe the doctrine of organic evolution. By such people the “evolutionist” is not infrequently regarded as an unbeliever in the “Word of God”; whereas the “evolutionist” may be fully as devout as the theologian in his acceptance of the Biblical narrative. The difference of opinion exists only in the matter of the meaning of the narrative, and not in its truthfulness.

 

It should be apparent to careful readers that the Biblical narrative does not attempt to explain the manner of man’s origin. On the other hand, it emphasizes the fact that God is the author of man’s existence, and, furthermore, that man was fashioned in the form of Deity. Elsewhere the record even states that human beings are His “offspring”.

 

If God were to repeat the story of man’s origin He would probably clear away man of the obscurities surrounding the account contained in the Jewish scriptures. Doubtless, however, as people become more and more anxious to know the truth, He will supply means for their enlightenment, but no one would care to say whether this enlightenment will come as a direct revelation from God or through the researches of science. (Frederick J. Pack, Science and Belief in God: A Discussion of Certain Phases of Science and their Bearing Upon Belief in the Supreme Being [Salt Lake City: The Deseret News, 1924], 178-80)