So, and the terms
"Father" and "Son" are personal terms; they're relational
terms. Alright, so, if you will, what we call the three persons could be
thought of three relational centres or three relational points of reference
that you know, each is a person, which we call a person, each is relationally-oriented
toward the others in this kind of mutual fellowship, mutual union. But they're
not persons in the human sense; Jesus is a human being of course, through the
Incarnation, but as a divine, as the divine Son, he shares the same incorporeal
divine natures as the Father and the Holy Spirit and yet they still have this
interrelationship--the Father sent the Son, this is a personal act. One person
sending another. Jesus goes back to heaven. The Father and the Son send the
Holy Spirit to be another paraclete. That's what we would call "personal
language," "personal action." (Is the Holy Spirit God or Just an
'Active Force'? w/ Robert M. Bowman Jr., beginning at the 1:19:35 mark)
On the claim that "God" is incorporeal by nature,
see:
Lynn Wilder vs. Latter-day Saint (and Biblical) Theology on Divine Embodiment
Andrew Malone on God being "Invisible" and 1 Timothy 1:17 and 6:16