Thursday, April 21, 2022

Emmanuel Doronzo on "Heretical Proposition" and "De Fide" in Catholic Theology

  

Heretical proposition (opposed to the note: de fide) is the gravest censure, involving a direct opposition to a proposition defined by the Magisterium as de fide. Such opposition can be either a direct contradiction (by saying, for instance: Christ is not a man) or a simple contrariety (Christ is an angel); in both cases there is heresy, because two contradictory, as well as two contrary propositions, cannot be true at once. With this censure are connected three lower and intermediate censures, which have a peculiar and undetermined opposition to faith, namely, proximate to heresy (opposite note: proximate to faith), tasting heresy (resembling heresy), and suspected of heresy: these last two imply only a probability of heresy. (Emmanuel Doronzo, The Channels of Revelation [The Science of Sacred Theology for Teachers 3; Middleburg, Va.: Notre Dame Institute Press, 1974], 63)

 

The opposite note “de fide” is distinguished by some theologians into that “of divine faith” (which would correspond to truths as merely found in the deposit of Scripture and Tradition) and that “of Catholic faith” (which is attributed to truths defined by the Magisterium). But it would be better to abstain from such a distinction, since there is only one faith and one object of faith, that which follows the definition of the Magisterium. Hence the expression “This is a truth of divine and Catholic faith,” occurring in some documents of the Magisterium, is a mere pleonasm which brings forth the two elements necessary to constitute the object of faith, namely the revelation of God and the proposition of the Magisterium. (Ibid., 63 n. 65)