Sunday, November 30, 2025

William H. Knecht's Statement Concerning a Prediction by President George Albert Smith Concerning California Saints Fleeing to Utah

The following is the statement from Wayne H. Knecht. It recounts a report by one of ten men who, in a private meeting with George Albert Smith, claimed he heard President Smith predict that the temple in California would be desecrated, forcing the Saints to flee to Utah:

 



 

 

"The following statements were made by the Prophet George Albert Smith;

 

made in the presence of the ten men who were petitioning him, in a private meeting in the latter 1940's, for a temple to be built in L.A. California. All ten men were well to do, influential, members of the Church. Nine of these men were native born Californians, one was Utah born.

 

2nd meeting

 

"Build the temple, use the temple, for the day will come when it will be desecrated."

 

3rd meeting

 

"You men are the sons of the men who came to California against the counsel of the Prophet Brigham Young. The day will come when you or your posterity will be willing to give up ALL you possess in this world, if you could just own one acre of rocky ground in Utah, and be standing on it. ... The time will come when ALL the saints in California will want to flee to Utah, but before they can start most will be killed, of the few who will be able to start, most of them will be killed before they leave the state."

 

The above is true and faithfully recorded from the mouth of one of the ten men who heard it from the mouth of the Prophet. Told to me personally on March 25, 1959.

 

[signed]

Wayne H. Knecht

 

Wayne H. Knecht

(801) 371-1338

 

Source: Wayne H. Knecht, Statement, repr. Jacob Peasant and Renee Martin, Visions of the Saints: Themes in Future Prophecy from Prophets & Visionaries (2025), 406



During George Albert Smith's presidency, there were no temples in California—the first would be dedicated March 11, 1956 (Los Angeles). Of course, one needs to be very careful about using this to prove anything–after all, we are not told who the source for Knecht's report is, and after querying the author of Visions of the Saints, they were unable to provide information as to the provenance of this work. I am just sharing here as it was interesting–no more, no less.

Brian E. Daly on Origen and the "Rule of Faith"

  

It was Origen, however, writing a generation after Irenaeus, who recognized this very process of maintaining and recognizing the faith is more complicated than it sounds. Origen’s life's work was principally the careful interpretation of the texts used by the mainstream Christian Churches as Scripture. . . . The problem facing Christians, however, even in the third century, as Origen sees it, was not the availability of Scripture, but its correct interpretation. There were many Christian sects, many individual lines of understanding; everyone understood the Bible according to his or her prior assumptions about God and the world. That the community of believers needed was a set of criteria for making sense of the Bible itself, as the ultimate criterion of faith. He continues:

 

Because, then, many of those who profess faith in Christ are in disagreement, not only in small, insignificant things, but even in large, very significant ones—for instance, on God or on the Lord Jesus Christ himself, or on the Holy Spirit, and not only on them but also on the other creatures, that is, on the dominations and the holy powers—for this reason it seems necessary first to lay down a clear line and an obvious rule on these details, one by one, and then to ask also about the other things. (De principiis, 2)

 

For Origen, this “clear line and obvious rule” can only be found in actively following Christ, and in understanding Christ in the way the Apostles have taught the Churches:

 

So since there are many who think they hold in their hearts what Christ holds—and some of them are of very different opinions from their forebears—yet the preaching of the Church is preserved handed down through the order of succession from the Apostles and remaining in the Churches up to the present time, only that truth is to be believed that in no respect departs from the tradition of the Church and the Apostles. (Ibid.)

 

Concretely, this means that the “rule of faith” which is itself distilled from biblical teaching—the ancestor of what we think of as the great baptismal creeds—is the community’s common framework, within which the form of Christian life and the meaning of individual biblical passages can be discerned. The Bible is the originating norm, by which the rule of faith is first formed; but the rule of faith—summarizing the Bible’s teaching as a whole—is in turn the interpretive norm, by which individual scriptural passages are understood consistently with the Bible’s whole message. (Brian E. Daly, “’In Many and Various Ways:’ Towards a Theology of Theological Exegesis,” in Biblical Interpretation and Doctrine in Early Christianity: Collected Essays [Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 2025], 69-70)

 

Brian E. Daly on Against Heresies 3.4.2:

  

2. To this disposition many nations of the barbarians who believe in Christ give assent, having salvation written in their hearts through the Spirit, without paper and ink, and guarding carefully the ancient tradition. They believe, namely, in one God the Creator of heaven and earth and of all things which are in them,5 and [in] Christ Jesus the Son of God, who, because of His surpassing love toward the creature He fashioned, accepted to be born of the Virgin. And so, by Himself He united man with God, suffered under Pontius Pilate, rose again, was taken up in glory and will come in glory as Savior of those who are saved and as Judge of those who are judged, hurling into eternal fire those who disfigure the truth and the condemners of His Father and of His own coming. Those who believed this faith, without writings, are barbarians with respect to their language; but as regards doctrine and practices and conduct they are most wise and pleasing to God on account of the faith, conducting themselves as they do in all justice and chastity and wisdom.

 

If anyone speaking in their language were to tell them about the fictions of the heretics, they would immediately stop up their ears and flee far away, tolerating not even to listen to such blasphemous discourse. So, because of the ancient tradition of the apostles, they do not allow even in the thought of their minds any of these heretics’ monstrous assertions whatever. In fact, among them there has been neither an assembly [of the heretics], nor any instruction in doctrine [by the heretics]. (Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.4.2, in St. Irenaeus of Lyons: Against the Heresies, Book 3 [trans. Dominic J. Unger, vol. 64, Ancient Christian Writers 64; New York: The Newman Press, 2012], 35)

 

 

The final criterions for recognizing the authentic Christian message, in other words—the interpretation of the world and human history that is genuinely based on the teaching and works of Jesus—is not any written text in itself, for Irenaeus, but rather the tradition of faith, maintained in properly constituted communities of faith, in which the texts that summarize that tradition are received and understood. Those who have been trained in this tradition develop, in his view, an ability to recognize Christian teaching intuitively, simply on the basis of living it. (Brian E. Daly, “’In Many and Various Ways:’ Towards a Theology of Theological Exegesis,” in Biblical Interpretation and Doctrine in Early Christianity: Collected Essays [Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 2025], 68)

 

Jewish/Rabbinic Parallels to Colossians 2:14

  

2:14 A: Wiping out the chirograph against us.

 

The certificate of debt was called שְׁטָר = “a piece of writing, register,” or more precisely שטר חוֹב or גֵּט חוֹב; מָחַק, Aram. מְחִק served as a verb for “wiping out.”

 

See m. ʾAbot 3.16 at § Matt 10:29 B, #3 toward the beginning. ‖ Tanḥuma צו (140B): Rabbi († 217?) said, “When a person sins, God records death for him; if he repents, the writ is annulled הכתב מתבטל (declared invalid); if he does not repent, what has been recorded remains a true (valid) writ (cf. Dan 10:21).” ‖ On eliminating certificates of debt שְׁטָרִין, שְׁטָרוֹת that God has in his hand against human beings, see y. Peʾah 1.16B.37 at § Rom 2:6. The parallel to this in b. Pesiq. 167A calls the certificate that God snatches away from the weighing pan of transgressions שטר חוב של עוונות “debt certificate of sins.” — See another parallel in b. Roš Haš. 17A. ‖ In the prayer Avinu Malkeinu there is a plea that reads as follows: Our father, our king, by your great mercy wipe out מְחוֹק all our certificates of debt כָּל־שִׁטְרֵי חוֹבוֹתֵינוּ! — Burning certificates of debt is also mentioned; see Exod. Rab. 15 (77A). — To speak of exacting payment for a certificate of debt, the verb גָּנָה was used; see Gen. Rab. 23 (15C). (Hermann L. Strack and Paul Billerbeck, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Midrash, ed. Jacob N. Cerone, 4 vols. [trans. Andrew Bowden and Joseph Longarino; Bellingham, Wash.: Lexham Press, 2021], 3:728-29)

 

Jewish/Rabbinic Parallels to Colossians 2:9

  

2:9: In him dwells the fullness of the divinity in a bodily way.

 

The ancient synagogue knows only of the Shekinah or the spirit of God resting on a person; see b. Pesaḥ. 117A at § 1 Cor 14:26. ‖ Babylonian Talmud Soṭah 48B: A voice from heaven sounded, which called out, “There is a person among you who would be worthy of the Shekinah dwell on him שתשרה שכינה עליו; but his time is not worthy of it.” — A few lines later, the same words of a voice from heaven appear again. See the unabbreviated report according to the parallel passage in t. Soṭah 13.3f. (318) at § Matt 3:17 A, #8. Here the voice from heaven cries out: “There is a person here who is worthy of the holy spirit.” This shows that the expression about the Shekinah resting on a person is synonymous with the spirit of prophecy or inspiration resting on a person. At the same time, one can recognize how infinitely far the apostle’s statement about Christ in Col 2:9 goes beyond the idea of the Shekinah resting on a person. ‖ A baraita in b. Sukkah 28A: Hillel the elder (ca. 20 BCE) had eighty students: thirty of them were worthy to have the Shekinah rest on them like our teacher Moses, and thirty of them were worthy to have the sun stand still for them as for Joshua the son of Nun; twenty of them were mediocre. The greatest among them was Jonathan b. Uzziel (the author of the targum at the Prophets), while the smallest among them was Rabban Yohanan b. Zakkai († ca. 80). (Hermann L. Strack and Paul Billerbeck, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Midrash, ed. Jacob N. Cerone, 4 vols. [trans. Andrew Bowden and Joseph Longarino; Bellingham, Wash.: Lexham Press, 2021], 3:727-28)

 

Report of a Miraculous Healing from Evangeline Florence Hansen Bickel (1917-2006)

  

I was born in Hutchinson, McLeod County, Minnesota, on November 17, 1917. By husband and I with our family moved to Utah in 1949, living in a trailer house, doing construction work until July 1955. In 1951 we lived in Hinckley, in the City Park, Utah, in our trailer. At that time I was afflicted with a very severe headache which I had had for seven years prior to 1951. I had gone to doctors and they couldn’t find anything wrong with me, but still I had the headaches. The doctors had informed me that it was not migraine headaches.

 

Mrs. Lillian Taylor of Hinckley asked me if I believed in prayer, and if I would consider going to be administered to by the Patriarch Chas. R. Woodbury. I told her I sincerely believed in prayer and in divine healings and miracles, and I believed that God could heal. We went to the Patriarch’s home. I told him that I was not a member of the Latter-day Saints Church and did not intend to become a member. The Patriarch left the room for the purpose of praying, he afterwards told me, and also to get consecrated oil. He stayed a long time during which time I was suffering severely with the headache and felt like returning home and going to bed. The headaches were so severe I lost all courage and did not care whether I lived or not.

 

He finally came into the room and took a seat behind the chair where I was sitting and he still waited a long time before he administered to me. He finally administered to me according to the practice of the L.D.S. Church. I was in severe pain during the administration and was not much interested in what he said until he began to speak of cancer. Then there was a certain confirmation in my mind that this was the cause of my trouble. He told me I would be healed and would not have any more headaches. The headaches left me immediately and from that day to this I have not been afflicted with them. He told me that the cancer would leave me thru the blood stream, and I would never be afflicted with it again. Later the cancer did leave me while living in our trailer home, and I saw it. There were four or five pieces of the cancer like the woody part of a tree, and it had arms or tenticles sticking out from it like decayed wood.

 

He told me he had gone in his room to pray for God to reveal to him the cause of my illness since I did not know the cause. He had waited until God revealed to him the cause of my affliction. God did reveal to him what it was before he administered to me. He told me I would become a member of the Church; that my husband and I would be married in the temple.

 

I became a member of the Church in 1955, but my husband has not as yet become a member but my two children have become members. He made me many promises if I lived obedient to the Gospel after joining the Church.

 

Another patriarch gave me my patriarchal blessing in which he also said my husband and I would be sealed in the temple. This latter blessing was given to me after I had become a member of the Church in December, 1955.

 

You must recall that I was very ill when the above took place, and if in any way there are errors, they are mine and I do know many other great promises were bestowed upon my head at that time. They were all as great as my healing, but all were with conditions.

 

I had studied to become a minister in the Assembly of God Church. I went to school in Springville, Missouri, in 1936-38. I did not graduate so did not become a minister but had been a member of that church for 22 years.

 

When I was living in alt Lake City in our trailer house which was located on 13th East and 21st South Streets, I wish the children wanted to go to Liberty Park. I walked that distance to the park and was very tired when we arrived there. We selected an empty bench inside the park but close to the street. As I reached the bench there sat an elderly man on one end of the bench. I sat on the gras at his feet and the children began to play. The man began to talk to me. We conversed for about two hours, and he told me I would become a member of the Latter-day Saint Church. I did not know anything about the Church except that I thought that polygamy was all there was to the Church. I told him I did not think it was possible, He told me many things about myself.

 

After conversing for two hours I decided to go home and started to go to the street and thence home. Before arriving at the sidewalk, which was only about 40 feet away, I turned around to wave goodbye to him, and to my astonishment he had gone and was nowhere to be seen. He could not have got out of the park in any way because it was only seconds from the time I arose from the grass to leave for home. It was many years afterwards when I learned of the translated Nephites.

 

He was an elderly man and was wearing modern fashioned clothes and hair cut. He was smooth shaven. His face and hands were beautiful, like a young child’s, and he had rosy complexion. He seemed to me to be about 65 years of age. He had on grey clothes, white shirt and a straight black tie, not fancy but plain, simple and tidy and neat. I asked him his name but I cannot now remember it. His hands were lying gently on his lap. He told me his mission on earth was to go about preaching the gospel in parks and on busses to people like me. This he said to my question as to what was his business. All of these experiences were entirely foreign to my former religious teaching and training in the Assembly of God Church. (Evangeline Hansen Bickel, “A Wonderful Visitation and Healing,” in Faith Like the Ancients’, ed. N. B. Lundwall, 2 vols. [Salt Lake City: Pioneer Press, 1973], 2:263-66)

 

Isaiah 54:17 in Targum Jonathan

  

Isa 54:17 in Targum Jonathan

 

כָל זֵין דְיִתַקַן עְלַך יְרוּשלַם לָא יַצלַח וְכָל לִישָן דִיקוּם עִמִיך לְדִינָא תְחַיְיבִינֵיה דָא אַחסָנַת עַבדַיָא דַיוי וְזָכוּתְהֹון מִן קֳדָמַי אְמַר יוי׃

 

English Translation:

 

54.17 no weapon that is prepared against you, Jerusalem, will prosper, and you shall declare a sinner every tongue that rises against you in judgment. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their innocence before me, says the LORD.” (The Isaiah Targum [trans. Bruce D. Chilton; The Aramaic Bible 11; Collegeville, Minn.: The Liturgical Press, 1990], Logos Bible Software edition)

 

Examples of Older Commentaries Interpreting the Promise of Isaiah 54:17 as Eschatological, Not Temporal, Vindication Against “Weapons” of Enemies

  

17. No weapon that is fashioned against you, as if to say, “If they produce various books against you, they will all perish.” Faber, the bishop of Rochester, Eck, and others wrote various and very ponderous books against us, but without success, since it is set forth here: This undertaking will not succeed, because we are sure that we have the true teaching, which is established with the most magnificent promises against all weapons prepared against us. They do not attack with wooden clubs, but our judgment is just, and by it we condemn them, even though they may also condemn us. “What can the righteous do” (Ps. 11:3), so that it has all the appearance that he is doing nothing? Nevertheless, “the spiritual man judges all things” (1 Cor. 2:15), but since these people judge us according to the flesh and not according to the Word, such carnal judgment is of no avail. (Martin Luther, Commentary on Isaiah 54, in LW 17:247-48)

 

 

These words will lead me to set before you,

 

I.                 The heritage of God’s servants—

II.                

Three things are here specified as their unalienable portion;

 

1.   Protection from danger—

 

[From the very beginning, they have been objects of hatred both to men and devils, who have combined their efforts for their destruction. From the days of Cain, the followers of Abel’s piety have been persecuted by their envious and malignant brethren; whilst “Satan, as a roaring lion, has gone about, seeking to devour them”———

 

But we need not fear the assaults of either: for God has engaged, in reference to his Church at large, that “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it;” and, in reference to every individual believer, that “none shall pluck them out of his handc.” “It is not his will that one of his little ones should perish.”]

 

2.   Vindication from calumny—

 

[What efforts have been made to destroy the character of God’s people may be seen in the account given of them by Haman to Ahasuerus: “There is a certain people scattered abroad, and dispersed among the people, in all the provinces of thy kingdom; and their laws are diverse from all people, neither keep they the king’s laws: therefore it is not for the king’s profit to suffer them. If it please the king, let it be written that they may be destroyed.” They still, as formerly, are a sect that is everywhere spoken against; nor is there “any manner of evil which will not be laid falsely to their charge,” But God does often, in a wonderful way, interpose for them, to the vindicating of their character, and the confusion of all their enemiesg. Indeed, the very people who most bitterly traduce them, often venerate them in their hearts; even as “Herod feared John, from an inward conviction that he was a just and holy man.” But, however God may suffer his people to be treated “as the filth of the world and the off-scouring of all thingsi” even to their dying hour, there is a time coming when he will appear in their behalf: and, if man have his day, God will have his day also; and will bring forth their righteousness as the light, and their judgment as the noon-dayl.”]

 

3.   Justification from all sin—

 

[In two ways will God justify his people: the one is, by an authoritative attestation from the mouth of their Judge; the other, by putting upon them that very righteousness whereby they shall be justified. The Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ, has wrought out “a righteousness which shall be unto all and upon all them that believe:” and when they are arrayed in this, “God sees in them no iniquityn,” because he has “blotted it out from the book of his remembrance,” and “cast it all behind him, into the very depths of the sea.” “If it be sought for ever so diligently, it cannot be foundp;” for they are before God without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, yea, holy, and without blemish.” “This is the blessed heritage of all God’s servants;” and all of them in due time shall possess it.]

 

That we may the better estimate their felicity, let us notice, (Charles Simeon, Horae Homileticae, 21 vols. [London: Holdsworth and Ball, 1832], 8:451-52)

 

 

The sense here is, that it shall not have final and ultimate prosperity. It might be permitted for a time to appear to prosper—as persecutors and oppressors have done; but there would not be final and complete success. (Albert Banes, Notes on the Old Testament: Isaiah, 2 vols. [London: Blackie & Son, 1851], 2:295)

 

 

Scripture Illustrated by Fact.

 

SEPTEMBER 4th.—‘Ye are Christ’s; and Christ’s is God’s.”—1st CORINTHIANS iii, 23

 

If that be so, then I am about as safe as God can make me. If I in heart abandon all that is opposed to Christ, and trust Him utterly and wholly for salvation ; if my love to Him manifest itself in earnest effort to be like Him, and to please Him in all things, then I shall engage in my behalf the wisdom, strength, and sympathy of Jehovah. A man was condemned by a Spanish court, to be shot. But he was of English birth, and had become an American citizen. So he appealed at once to the consuls of those nations, who interfered, and declared that the Spanish authorities had no power to put the man to death. They, however, would not listen, and persisted in their intention to shoot him. The consuls then took the man and wrapped him in their flags ; they covered him with the Union Jack and the Stars and Stripes, and defied the executioners. 'There the man is,' they said, 'and touch him if you dare. Fire a shot at those flags, and you bring upon you the power of the empires you defy. There stood the man, and there stood the soldiers; but not a shot was fired; he seemed more invulnerable than though he had been wrapped in a coat of mail. When a man has been known as a British subject, and has been among tyrants on their thrones, or among savages in the desert, and so has appeared as a lamb among lions, he has nevertheless been allowed to pass unharmed, simply because as a British subject he was guarded by that nation's power. He had a charmed life in their midst, because the unseen arm of a mighty power compassed him round as with a shield. If, then, the might of an earthly power is able to do this, what about the might of Him who is King of kings, and Lord of lords ? He knows just exactly what forces earth and hell can bring into the field, and with full consciousness of this declares that no weapon against His own shall prosper. Foes may assail, but they shall not prevail ; Christ holds specially dear those He has bought at such cost, and will never disappoint the trust that clings to His arm of strength. (“Scripture Illustrated by Fact,” The Christian Messenger [September 1887], 261)

 

Saturday, November 29, 2025

Brian E. Daly on the Dormition and Assumption of Mary (1998)

  

Our first witness to such an interest is the heresy-hunting Cypriot bishop Epiphanius of Salamis, who spent most of his industrious and strident career in the neighborhood of Jerusalem. In chapter 78 of his heresiological handbook, the Panarion, completed around the year 377, Epiphanius is arguing against a group he calls the Antidikomarianitai or “opponents of Mary,” who deny her perpetual virginity. He makes the point that Jesus would not have confided his Mother to the care of the Beloved Disciple, as we read he did in John 19, if she had a house and family of her own. He then goes on to deny that John took Mary with him on his missionary journeys—apparently to prevent clerics of his own day from offering this as a precedent for keeping house with their own female companions—and suggests that she was not living with him at the end of her life. He adds that if one searches the Scripture carefully,

 

one will find neither the death of Mary, nor whether she died or did not die, nor whether she was buried or was not buried … Scripture is simply silent, because of the exceeding greatness of the Mystery, so as not to overpower people’s minds with wonder.

 

Referring then to the passage in Apocalypse of John 12, where a woman who bears a child is carried away to the desert to escape the attacks of the dragon who wars against God’s people, Epiphanius adds:

 

It is possible that this was fulfilled in Mary. I do not assert this definitively, however, nor do I say that she remained immortal; but I also will not say definitively that she died. For the Scripture goes far beyond the human mind, and has left this point undecided because of the surpassing dignity of that vessel [of God] …

 

Later on in the chapter, while combatting the theories of another heretical group, whose failing seems to have been an excess, rather than a defect, of reverence for the Virgin—the “Collyridians,” a women’s sect who, Epiphanius says, regarded her as a goddess and celebrated a quasi-Eucharistic liturgy in her honor—the Cypriot bishop makes the same self-consciously inconclusive point:

 

If the holy Virgin died and was buried, her falling-asleep was honorable and her end holy; her crown consisted in her virginity. Or if she was put to death, according to the Scripture, ‘A sword shall pierce her soul,’ her fame is among the martyrs and her holy body should be an object of our veneration, since through it light came into the world. Or else she remained alive; for it is not impossible for God to do whatever he wills. In fact, no one knows her end.

 

Epiphanius’s very caution here—his refusal to decide whether Mary died a holy death and was buried, or in some mysterious way has remained alive, perhaps in the same way as Enoch and Elijah in the Old Testament, who were said to be taken up to heaven—suggests at least that the question had become an open one in late fourth-century Palestine, and that the strong devotion to Mary that characterized the Syrian and Palestinian Churches had already begun to lead believers there to wonder whether her end was not in some way more wonderful and more glorious than that of other Christians.

 

In the half-century that followed the Council of Chalcedon, the figure of Mary emerged like a comet in Christian devotion and liturgical celebration throughout the world. Spurred on, perhaps, by the powerful role of royal women in the fifth-century Byzantine court and drawn inevitably by the Christological controversies of the age to consider Mary’s role in the story of salvation, Byzantine writers began to focus on Mary now not simply as the one who gave flesh to God’s Word, but as an object of veneration in her own right: as queen and patroness, and as a participant in the glory and the heavenly mediatorship of her risen Son. Contemporary with this new relationship to Mary came a growing interest in the wonderful character of her life’s end, which seems to have found its first written narrative expression among those communities of Syria and Palestine, in the late fifth century, which opposed as irreligious the Council of Chalcedon’s description of Christ as a single individual existing in two unmingled and functioning natures, the human and the divine—a point to which we shall shortly return.

 

This story of Mary’s glorious end, which was to become common coin by the end of the sixth century, appears in a variety of earlier forms that are difficult to date with certainty. Most scholars agree that the oldest extant witness to the story is provided by a group of Syriac fragments in the British Library (the documents Michel van Esbroeck labels S 1) describing the burial of Mary, the reception of her soul by Jesus, and the transferral of her body to Paradise, where it is buried under the tree of life—a narrative usually dated to the second half of the fifth century. The earliest Greek accounts—and the earliest known full narrative of Mary’s death—are the well-known Transitus Mariae attributed to John the Evangelist (van Esbroeck’s G 1) and a somewhat different text discovered by Antoine Wenger in a Paris manuscript and first published in 1965 (van Esbroeck’s G 2).18 Both these versions of the story, usually dated to the late fifth or early sixth century, provide a greatly expanded version of the Syriac narrative we have mentioned. Here Mary, living in or near Jerusalem, is informed by an angel that her death is near. She is then joined by the twelve Apostles, who are miraculously gathered from the ends of the earth. After a number of speeches by herself and her companions, she commits her soul into the hands of Jesus and dies. As the Apostles set about burying her body in a new tomb near Gethsemane, a Jew named Jephoniah tries to hinder the procession, and is temporarily deprived of the use of his hands. The apostles keep watch at her tomb for three days, and then realize that her body, as well as her soul, has been conveyed by angels to Paradise. In the text published by Wenger (“R” or G 2), Jesus actually joins the apostles at her tomb, and he and they accompany the angelic escort carrying her body to Paradise, where it is reunited with her soul.

 

Versions of this story abound in all the ancient Christian languages, some of them probably of the same antiquity as the texts we have mentioned. There are also versions of it in the works of two major theologians from late-fifth-century Syria, both of whom are usually identified with the moderate wing of the anti-Chalcedonian movement: Jacob of Serug and the Pseudo-Dionysius. The latter’s work On the Divine Names contains a famous, if somewhat enigmatic passage alluding to the occasion when the supposed author, his “divine guide” Hierotheos, and the other “inspired hierarchs” of the Apostolic Church, including Peter and James, had gathered “to gaze at the body that was the source of our life, the vessel of God,” and joined together in an ecstatic outpouring of divinely-inspired hymnody. Jacob of Serug’s vast corpus of verse-homilies includes a sermon of 110 lines on the subject of Mary’s death and glorious reception into heaven, which was delivered—according to its Syriac title—at a synod of non-Chalcedonian bishops at Nisibis in 489. Jacob, too, depicts Mary’s elaborate burial on the Mount of Olives by Jesus and the Twelve; he evokes the jubilation of all nature at her entry into glory, describes her visit to Hades, where she summons all the patriarchs and prophets to share eternal life with her, and portrays the solemn reception of her soul by Christ, who crowns her as queen before all “the celestial assemblies.” It is interesting to note that neither Ps.-Dionysius nor Jacob of Serug suggests that Mary’s body shared in her glorification; in Jacob’s homily, her body apparently joins those of her ancestors in the realms of the dead, to await resurrection. Nevertheless, for both these authors her death is a moment of mystery, parallel in some ways to the death of Jesus, and a time of unique recognition of her holiness by her Son and the heavenly powers. For Jacob, it even means the beginning of a new role for Mary, similar to that of Jesus, as cosmic ruler and herald of renewed life for all the faithful.

 

By the second half of the sixth century, it is clear that the story of Mary’s transition from earth to heaven had come to be accepted as part of Christian tradition in both the Chalcedonian and the non-Chalcedonian Churches of the East. Sixth-century travellers’ accounts of Christian Jerusalem now refer to a basilica at the site of her tomb. We know that the basilica near Gethsemane was venerated as the place of Mary’s death by the time of the “Piacenza Pilgrim,” around 570. The oldest extant Coptic homily (C 5) celebrating the feast of her assumption into heaven, on August 15, by the anti-Chalcedonian Patriarch Theodosius of Alexandria, dates from 566–67 and explicitly locates the wonderful event at Gethsemane. The Georgian lectionary of Jerusalem, based on a Greek original compiled sometime between the end of the fifth and the end of the eighth century, clearly identifies the old memoria of the Theotokos on August 15 as the feast of her “migration” to heaven, and specifies that it is celebrated at “the building of the emperor Maurice at Gethsemane”: presumably at the fifth-century basilica, restored during the reign of Maurice (582–602), which by then was recognized as the spot where both her burial and her assumption took place. Most important, perhaps, is the laconic testimony of the fourteenth-century historian Nikephoros Kallistos Xanthopoulos that the same Emperor Maurice fixed August 15 as the date for the Churches of the whole Empire to celebrate Mary’s Dormition. By the last two decades of the sixth century, the story of her glorious passage from earth to heaven had clearly become the central theme of this important Marian feast, and its celebration in Jerusalem was just as clearly localized at the restored Church at Gethsemane. By this time, too, the supposed site of her residence and of her actual death seems to have been shifted to the fourth-century basilica on Mount Sion, and part of the Dormition festival may have taken place there as well.

 

From all the extant narrative material, as well as from the earliest homilies for the feast of the Dormition, it is also clear that by the time of Maurice’s decree, the mystery being celebrated on August 15 was universally understood as including both Mary’s death and her resurrection. The stages by which this understanding of the event evolved, if it was an organic evolution at all, are far from clear; questions about the possibility of her bodily translation, as we have seen, haunted Epiphanius in the fourth century, and the absence of bones in the tomb venerated as hers must have fueled such speculation. Simon Claude Mimouni has recently suggested that the late-sixth-century understanding of Mary’s end may reflect a compromise between two wings of the anti-Chalcedonian movement, in which both the celebration and its narrative core had their original home: compromise between the Julianists or “aphthartists,” who seem to have held that the pristine purity of the flesh Jesus took from Mary exempted that flesh—in him at least, and perhaps in her as well—from the necessity of dying, and the more moderate Severans, who held that Jesus’ humanity—and thus Mary’s, too—shared all our natural qualities, including mortality. In Mimouni’s view, as the Emperor Justinian continued to push all parties in the Christological disputes to work towards a common position, Severans and Julianists may have come to agree that Mary did indeed die, but was almost immediately raised in body and taken to heaven, because of her unique dignity as mother of the Son of God. The Chalcedonian Justinian—who himself is reported to have adopted the “aphthartist” view of Jesus’ humanity at the end of his life, and who was an enthusiastic promoter of Mary’s cul1—may well have been responsible for securing the universal acceptance of this understanding of her final glorification.

 

In any case, it is striking that precisely in the period in which the ancient Church was most engaged in reflection and debate about the person of Christ—between the First Council of Constantinople, in 381, and the Second, in 553—both doctrine and devotion concerning his Mother seem to have evolved most fully. The formulation of the Mystery of Christ’s person ratified at the Council of Chalcedon in 451 represented a compromise between the Antiochene and Western approaches, on the one hand, with their insistence that the unity of the divine and the human in the one person of the Son of God involved no diminution in him of the active reality of either of those “natures,” and the approach of Alexandrian writers, shared by most Eastern monks and faithful, on the other, which emphasized the overpowering and transforming effect of the Son of God’s personal presence in Jesus, even while they affirmed the completeness of his humanity. Love of Mary, attentive focus on her in private and liturgical prayer, recognition of her divine prerogatives as mediator and queen, ultimately even the attribution to her of a full share in her Son’s triumph over death and bodily entry into the glory of God, all seem to have grown rapidly during the fifth and sixth centuries as a kind of by-product of the Alexandrian emphasis on the divine identity of Christ’s person and the divinization of his humanity by its assumption into the inner life of the Triune God, as the Son’s own body and soul. The strongly unitive, God-centered picture of Christ so widely shared in the Eastern Churches of the fifth century, which led first to widespread popular rejection of the Chalcedonian formula of faith and later to its careful nuancing and interpretation, at Justinian’s urging, by the official Church at the Second Council of Constantinople, was fundamentally an expression of faith, after all, in God’s active and transforming presence in the human sphere, and of hope in the ultimate divinization of all humanity. The early Church’s veneration of Mary, the sense of her unique immersion into the Mystery of salvation because of her unique nearness to Christ, beginning in litanies of fulsome praise and ending in the feast of the Dormition, is really part of this growth in understanding of Christ himself, and in drawing out its spiritual and liturgical implications. (Brian E. Daily, “Introduction,” in On the Dormition of Mary: Early Patristic Homilies [Popular Patristic Series 18; Crestwood, N.Y.: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1998], 5-12)

 

Brian E. Daly on the Dormition and Assumption of Mary (2025)

  

Significantly, it was probably during this same fifth century that serious Christian reflection began on Mary’s status after her death. Around 377, Epiphanius of Salamis remarks, in his antiheretical collection called the Panarion (“medicine chest”), that, despite the practices of various groups honoring places connected with Mary’s life and death, the details of her death—or even whether she died and was buried at all—remain uncertain. But by the end of the fifth century, the conviction seems to have been forming—probably first in communities that strongly affirmed Christ’s divine identity and distanced themselves from the “two-natures” dogmatic formula in the Council of Chalcedon—that Mary had in fact died in peace in Jerusalem, surrounded by the apostles and other heroes of the faith, that she had been solemnly buried, and that her tomb was found empty three days later. These traditions confirmed the general sense of believers that Mary had been raised up to heaven to share fully in her divine Son’s risen life. This story, in its general outlines at least, is hinted at somewhat obscurely by the Pseudo-Dionysius in chapter 3 of his On the Divine Names, written probably around 500. Although the various later forms of this narrative differ widely in detail, and although none ever became normative as narratives for the mainstream Christian churches, the Marian liturgical celebration on August 15 soon became focused on Mary’s holy death and subsequent entry into glory, that is, on what the Byzantine tradition has called her “dormition” or falling asleep. This feast was apparently extended to the whole empire during the reign of the emperor Maurice (582-602), and became for later Byzantine Christianity a central symbol of Christian hope for life after death and for the full redemption of the human person. By the end of the eighth century, Mary’s death was celebrated and preached as a mystery of faith in the Latin West as well. With the general acceptance of this feast of Mary’s redemption and glorification, in fact, Mary’s theological position had shifted from being a necessary guarantor of the human reality of Jesus’s flesh, personal proof of the genuineness of the World’s incarnation, to being a person with a continuing role in assuring Christians of their own salvation.

 

Our best guide to the significance of this new Marian feast in the late patristic period is not the narratives of her death and burial, and of the discovery of her empty tomb—narratives that, despite their wide distribution, were always regarded with skepticism by Church authorities—but the formal, rhetorically elaborate homilies for the feast that have come down to us from Byzantine preachers of the seventh, eighth, and ninth centuries: authors like Andrew of Crete, Germanus of Constantinople, and John of Damascus. Andrew of Crete, for instance, acknowledges more than once in his trilogy of sermons for the feast that the “mystery” celebrated as Mary’s dormition “has not, in the past, been celebrated by many people,” and that there is no mention of it in the New Testament. So Andrew and the other ancient homilists express their understanding of what actually happened at Mary’s death with great caution: it is “a mystery that exceeds the power of speech,” and event that “exceeds the bounds of our ignorance” and, like everything connected with the ultimate form of human salvation, is best “honored by silence.” Andrew of Create expressly declines to speculate on the process by which Mary’s body was “transformed” from its mortal state, its existence as a corpse, to its present “supernatural structure (logos) that lies beyond all words and all knowledge of ours.” His sense of the central message of the feast, however, is unmistakable: Mary has died in a spirit of utter faith and trust, has been laid reverently in a tomb by the Apostles and other “original” followers of her Son, and now shares, as a complete human person, in the state of eschatological fulfillment in which we all hope to share, as a result of the death and resurrection of Christ. (Brian E. Daly, “Woman of Many Names: Mary in Orthodox and Catholic Theology,” in Biblical Interpretation and Doctrine in Early Christianity: Collected Essays [Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 2025], 91-93)

 

Brian E. Daly on the Protoevangelium of James

  

Around the middle of the second century, the narrative we know as the Protoevangelium, or Book of James, about Mary’s origins and life up to the birth of Jesus, was composed probably in Palestine or Syria for a community of Christians clearly aware of their Jewish religious roots. Written in the style of many stories in the Jewish midrashim, this work is, in a way, an extended commentary in story form on the events and characters of the infancy narratives in Matthew and Luke; it tells us of Mary’s devout parents, Joachim and Anna, of the wonderful circumstances of her conception and childhood, of her espousal to Joseph, an elderly and pious widower and of her miraculous childbirth. Although it was never accepted into the Christian biblical canon and was regarded with suspicion as apocryphal by Church authorities through most of its history, the Protoevangelium was widely read; it was translated into most of the languages of early Christian communities by the year 1000 and left a clear mark on Chrisitan preaching and liturgy in both East and West, as well as on the Christian imagination. Its point is to remind the reader that Mary, the mother of Jesus, was from the beginning of her life a completely holy person; with her life centered on Israel’s temple, she remained blameless in the eyes of the Law. From such beginnings the Word of God took flesh. (Brian E. Daly, “Woman of Many Names: Mary in Orthodox and Catholic Theology,” in Biblical Interpretation and Doctrine in Early Christianity: Collected Essays [Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 2025], 88-89)

 

Why Mariology Is a True Dividing Line: The Marian Prayers To/Through Mary in The Raccolta: Or, Collection of Indulgenced Prayers & Good Works (1950)

The following are notes I prepared for a dialogue on Mariology if/when Marian veneration and prayers were to come up.

Ambrose St. John, The Raccolta: Or, Collection of Indulgenced Prayers & Good Works (1950; repr. Victoria, Canada: Must Have Books, 2021)

 

Sub tuum praesidium dating:

 

C. H. Roberts Dating the Sub tuum praesidium to the Fourth Century

 

Fourth century. . . . .This prayer, written in brown ink on a small sheet of papyrus (the verso is blank), is probably a private copy; there are no indications that it was intended for liturgical use. (Catalogue of the Greek and Latin Papyri in the John Rylands Library Manchester, ed. C. H. Roberts [Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1938], 3:46, emphasis in bold added)

 

Theodore De Bruyn: The Sub tuum praesidium dates probably to the sixth or seventh century, or even later

 

Much has been made of P.Ryl. III 470, which preserves an early witness to the antiphon Sub tuum praesidium, a prayer for protection addressed directly to the Theotokos. But it is less certain now that this papyrus should be assigned to the fourth century, let alone the third century; it probably belongs to the sixth or seventh century, or even later, though scholars of the cult of Mary have been either unaware of, or slow to accept, recent paleographical examinations of the papyrus. The most common name for churches or other sites dedicated to Mary in Egypt is “holy Mary,” an expression that appears from the fifth century onward. Considerably fewer sites are dedicated to the Theotokos, a name that first appears in the sixth century. In fact, the predominance of “holy Mary,” a form of regard used for other saints as well, has prompted the suggestion that Mary was revered as one saint among many others in Egypt. Indeed, at Oxyrhynchus in the early sixth century, liturgies were celebrated either more frequently or as frequently at churches dedicated to several other saints than at the church dedicated to Mary. (Theodore De Bruyn, “Appeals to the Intercessions of Mary in Greek Liturgical and Paraliturgical Texts from Egypt,” in Presbeia Theotokou: The Intercessory Role of Mary across Times and Places in Byzantium (4th–9th Century), ed. Leena Mari Peltomaa, Andreas Külzer, and Pauline Allen [Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademia der Wissenschaften, 2015], 116-17, emphasis in bold added)

 

Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (4th ed.) on dating of STP:

 

Belief in the efficacy of Mary’s intercession and hence direct prayers to her is prob. very old. It is attested in a Gk form of the well-known prayer ‘Sub tuum praesidium’ found in a papyrus dating from the late 3rd to early 4th cent. In the W. the honour accorded to Mary reached a high point in the 11th and 12th cents. Thomas Aquinas formulated the doctrine of the ‘hyperdulia’ proper to her, which, though infinitely inferior to the ‘latria’ (worship of adoration) due to her son, surpasses that befitting angels and saints.

 

Sarah Jane Boss, “Mary, the Blessed Virgin,” in The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, ed. Andrew Louth, 2 vols. (4th ed.; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), 2:1230

 

 

Indulgences Granted by the Keys held by the Pontiff:

 

Council of Trent:

 

Decree Concerning Indulgences

989 [DS 1835] Since the power of granting indulgences was conferred by Christ on the Church, and she has made use of such power divinely given to her, [cf. Matt. 16:19; 18:18] even in the earliest times, the holy Synod teaches and commands that the use of indulgences, most salutary to a Christian people and approved by the authority of the sacred Councils, is to be retained in the Church, and it condemns those with anathema who assert that they are useless or deny that there is in the Church the power of granting them.… [1]

 

Pohle:

 

An indulgence has two essential characteristics or notes: (1) it is a remission of temporal punishments; (2) it is granted outside the Sacrament of Penance.

 

An indulgence, therefore, is not identical with the sacramental penance enjoined by the confessor, which blots out punishments ex opere operato. It is a remission of temporal punishments granted by the Church outside the Sacrament, by an exercise of the power of the keys entrusted to her by her Divine Founder. It follows that indulgences can be granted only by those who possess the power of the keys, i. e. the pope and the bishops.[2]

 

Catholic Encyclopedia:

 

The power to grant indulgences

 

Once it is admitted that Christ left the Church the power to forgive sins (see PENANCE), the power of granting indulgences is logically inferred. Since the sacramental forgiveness of sin extends both to the guilt and to the eternal punishment, it plainly follows that the Church can also free the penitent from the lesser or temporal penalty. This becomes clearer, however, when we consider the amplitude of the power granted to Peter (Matthew 16:19): “I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shaft loose on earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven.” (Cf. Matthew 18:18, where like power is conferred on all the Apostles.) No limit is placed upon this power of loosing, “the power of the keys”, as it is called; it must, therefore, extend to any and all bonds contracted by sin, including the penalty no less than the guilt. When the Church, therefore, by an indulgence, remits this penalty, her action, according to the declaration of Christ, is ratified in heaven.[3]

 

Ludwig Ott:

 

Pope Leo X in the Indulgence Decretal “Cum postquam” (1518), bases the Church’s power to grant Indulgences on the power of the keys. This must not be understood as referring in the narrow sense to the power of forgiving sins, but rather as referring in the wider sense to the jurisdiction of the Church. [4]

 

CCC:

 

X.         Indulgences

1471 The doctrine and practice of indulgences in the Church are closely linked to the effects of the sacrament of Penance.

What is an indulgence?

“An indulgence is a remission before God of the temporal punishment due to sins whose guilt has already been forgiven, which the faithful Christian who is duly disposed gains under certain prescribed conditions through the action of the Church which, as the minister of redemption, dispenses and applies with authority the treasury of the satisfactions of Christ and the saints.”

“An indulgence is partial or plenary according as it removes either part or all of the temporal punishment due to sin.” The faithful can gain indulgences for themselves or apply them to the dead.[5]

 

 

Aquinas, Summa Theologica, STh., Supplementum q.25 a.2 ad 1:

 

Reply Obj. 1. As stated above (Q. XIX., A. 3) there are two keys, the key of Orders and the key of jurisdiction. The key of Orders is a sacramental: and as the effects of the sacraments are fixed, not by men but by God, the priest cannot decide in the tribunal of confession how much shall be remitted by means of the key of Orders from the punishment due; it is God Who appoints the amount to be remitted. On the other hand the key of jurisdiction is not something sacramental, and its effect depends on a man’s decision. The remission granted through indulgences is the effect of this key [RB: I.e., the key of jurisdiction], since it does not belong to the dispensation of the sacraments, but to the distribution of the common property of the Church:—hence it is that legates, even though they be not priests, can grant indulgences. Consequently the decision of how much punishment is to be remitted by an indulgence depends on the will of the one who grants that indulgence. If, however, he remits punishment without sufficient reason, so that men are enticed to substitute mere nothings, as it were, for works of penance, he sins by granting such indulgences, although the indulgence is gained fully.[6]

 

Prayers to/through Mary from the 1950 ed. of The Raccolta:

 

 

PRAYER TO THE MOST HOLY VIRGIN.

 

Mary, dear mother! Mother most amiable! Tender mother! Mother full of love and sweetness for thy clients and children! We pray thee, by this our loving act of thanksgiving to the Most Holy Trinity, obtain for all of us grace ever to employ the powers of our soul, and our five senses, to the honour and glory o God, One in Three Persons, directing all our actions to Him, and loving Him with pure Heart, even as thou didst love Him here on earth; that thus we may be able to attain to the enjoyment of Him in the bliss of heaven with thee for ever and ever. (pp. 16-17)

 

 

TO THE MOST BLESSED VIRGIN.

 

I acknowledge thee and I venerate thee, most holy Virgin, Queen of Heaven, Lady and Mistress of the Universe, as Daughter of the Eternal FATHER, Mother of his well-beloved SON, and most loving Spouse of the HOLY SPIRIT. Kneeling at the feet of thy great Majesty, with all humility I pray thee, through that divine charity with which thou wast so bounteously enriched on thy Assumption into heaven, to vouchsafe me favour and pity, placing me under thy most safe and faithful protection, and receiving me into the number of thy happy and highly-favoured servants. Deign, Mother and Lady most tender, to accept my miserable heart, memory, will, powers, and senses, internal and external; govern them all in conformity to the good pleasure of thy Divine Son, as I intend by my every thought and deed to give thee glory and honour. And, by that wisdom with which thy well-beloved Son glorified thee, I pray and beseech thee to obtain for me light that I may clearly know myself and my own nothingness, and in particular my sins, that so I may hate and loathe them ; and that I may discern the snares of the infernal enemy, and all his modes of attack, whether open or hidden. Above all, most tender Mother, I beg of thee the grace of N.

 

Say three times,

 

Virgo singularis,
Inter omnes mitis,
Nos culpis solutos
Miltes fac et castos

 

Virgin of all virgins
to thy shelter take us;
Gentlest of the gentle!
Chaste and gentle make us. (p. 19)

 

 

THE PRAYER, “O JESU, VIVENS IN MARIA,” ETC.

 

By a Rescripto f Oct. 14, 1859, his Holiness Pope Pius IX, granted—The indulgence of 300 days to all the faithful who with contrite heart and with devotion shall say the following prayer:

 

. . .

 

TRANSLATION.

 

O Jesus, who dost live in Mary (O Jesu, vivens in Maria), come and live in Thy servants, in the spirit of Thine own holiness, in the fullness of Thy power, in the reality of Thy virtues, in the perfection of Thy ways, in the communion of Thy mysteries,--have Thou dominion over every adverse power, in Thine own spirit, to the glory of Thy Father. Amen. (p. 50)

 

 

TO THE MOST HOLY VIRGIN, MOTHER OF SORROWS.

 

Mary, Virgin Mother of God, Martyr of love and sorrow, in that thou didst witness the pains and torments of Jesus; truly didst thou concur in the great work of my redemption, first by thy innumerable afflictions, and then by the offering thou didst make to the Eternal Father of his and thy only-begotten for a holocaust and victim of propitiation for my sins. I thank thee for that love, well-nigh infinite, through which thou didst bereave thyself of the fruit of thy womb, very God and very Man, to save me, sinner that I am; let thy intercession, which never returneth to thee void, interpose with the Father and the Son for me; that I may steadily amend my evil ways, and never by further faults crucify afresh my loving Saviour; that so, persevering in his grace until death, I may obtain eternal life through the merits of his painful Passion and Death upon the Cross.

 

. . .

 

Let us pray.

 

O Lord Jesus Christ, who at the sixth hour of the day didst, for the redemption of the world, mount the scaffold of the Cross, and shed thy Precious Blood for the remission of sins; we humbly beseech Thee grant us that after our death we may joyfully enter the gates of Paradise.

 

Grant, we beseech Thee, O Lord Jesus Christ, that now, and at the hour of our death, blessed Mary ever Virgin, thy Mother, may intercede for us, through whose most holy soul the sword passed in the hour of thy Passion. Through Thee, Jesus Christ, Saviour of the world, who with the Father and the Holy Ghost livest and reignest for ever and ever. Amen. (pp. 77, 78)

 

 

PRAYERS FOR A VISIT TO THE MOST HOLY SACRAMENT OR TO MOST HOLY MARY (FROM ST. ALPHONSO DE’ LIQUORI).

 

The Sovereign Pontiff Pius IX., by a Rescript of Sept. 7, 1851, which is preserved in the venerable house of the Oblates of Toree de’ Specchi, granted for ever—

 

300 days of indulgence to the faithful every time they shall say the following prayers, composed by St. Alphonso for a visit to the most holy Sacrament, before the tabernacle, where our Lord is enclosed, or to the Blessed Virgin Mary before her image.

 

The plenary indulgence, moreover, to be gained once am onth, when, having used one or other of these devotions in the manner above indicated, they shall, having Confessed and Communicated, prayer for the wants of the holy Church, according to the intention of the Sovereign Pontiff.

 

. . .

 

THE PRAYER FOR A VISIT TO THE MOST HOLY MARY.

 

O most holy Virgin, Immaculate Mary my Mother, to thee, who art the Mother of my Lord, the Queen of the world, the advocate, hope and refuge of sinners, I, most wretched sinner, have recourse this day; and I give thee thanks for all the favours thou hast bestowed on me up to this moment, especially for having freed us from hell, which I have so many times deserved. I love thee, O most loving Mother, and for the love which I bear thee I promise to be ready always to serve thee, and to do my best to make thee beloved by others. In thee I let all my hopes repose, all my salvation; accept me for thy servant, and gather me beneath thy robe, O Mother of mercy. And since thou art so powerful with God, free me from all temptations, or, at any rate, obtain for me strength to overcome them up to the moment of my death. O my Mother, for the love thou bearest to God, I pray thee to aid me always, but most in the last moment of my life. Leave me not till thou dost see me safe in heaven, there to bless thee and sing thy mercies for all eternity. Amen. This is my hope. Amen. (pp. 110, 111-12)

 

 

ROSARY

 

. . .

 

IN order to animate all the faithful often to have recourse to the Blessed Virgin by using this devotion, Pope Benedict XII, granted, by his Brief, Sanctissimus, of April 13, 1726, to all who say with contrition the whole Rosary of fifteen decades, or the third part of it of five decades—

 

i. An indulgence of 100 days for every Pater noster and every Ave Maria.

ii. A plenary indulgence to all who shall say the third part of it once every day for a year; on any Confession and Communion.

 

The present Sovereign Pontiff Pius IX., by a decree of the S. Cong. of Indulgences of Mary 12, 1851, confirmed these Indulgences, and granted besides—

 

iii. An Indulgence, on the last Sunday in every month, to all who are in the habit of saying with others, at least three times a week, the said third part of the Rosary; provided that on that Sunday they shall, after Confession and Communion, visit a church or public oratory, and pray there for a time according to the mind of his Holiness. (pp. 122, 123)

 

 

 

INVOCATION OF THE MOST HOLY NAME OF MARY

 

Mary is the name of our tender Mother, our loving Mediatrix, the Stewardess of God’s graces, the Queen of the Universe, and Mother of God. This name has many mystic meanings—as, Star of the Sea, who dost illuminate the world, Princess; titles of glory to her, and consolation to us. The name of Mary, then, ought to be ever in our hearts, and often on our lips during life, and specially at the moment of our death. To animate the faithful often to invoke this name in union with the name of Jesus, Pope Sixtus V., in his Bull Reddituri, of July 11, 1587, granted many Indulgences afterwards confirmed by Benedict XIII. (p. 135)

 

 

PSALMS IN HONOR OF HER MOST HOLY NAME

 

Amongst the devout practices invented to honour the most holy name of Mary, our Mother and our Queen, one of the most ancient is that of saying Five Psalms whose initial letters compose her name. This devotion, well known in Italy and France, and in other kingdoms, has been much more extensively circulated ever since the Venerable Pope Innocent XI., in 1684, established throughout the whole Catholic world the Feast of this Glorious Name of Mary, at the same the time he instituted the archconfraternity of the Name of Mary, with power to aggregate to itself other confraternities out of Rome; to all of whose members who should recite these five psalms in honour of the name of the great Virgin, he granted certain Indulgences, confirmed by subsequent Popes.

 

Pope Pius VII., desirous that all the faithful should practice this devotion, by a decree of the S. Cong. of Indulgences of June 13, 1815, granted the following fresh Indulgences:

 

i. The Indulgence or seven years and seven quarantines for each recitation of these psalms.

ii. A plenary indulgence once a month to all who recite them daily for a month, on any one day when, after Confession and Communion, they pray according to the intention of the Sovereign Pontiff.

iii. A plenary indulgence on the Sunday in the octave of our Lady’s Nativity (the Feast of her Name), provided that on that day, after Confession and Communion, they pray as above.

 

. . .

 

V. Blessed be the name of Mary the Virgin.
R. From henceforth and for ever more.

 

Let us pray.

Grant, we beseech Thee, Almighty God, that Thy faithful people, wino rejoice in the shelter of the name and protection of the most Holy Virgin Mary, may by her loving intercession be delivered from all evils here on earth, and be made worthy to attain eternal glory, in the life to come. Through our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen. (pp. 135-36, 138)

 

 

PRAYER TO THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY

 

The devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus having been firmly established in the Catholic world, it seemed fitting that a similar devotion should be established in honour of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Accordingly, Benedict XIV., with a Bull of March 7, 1753, erected in the church of the Most Holy Redeemer, near Ponte Sisto in Rome, the first Confraternity which took its name from the Immaculate Heart of Mary; and Pope Pius VII., whilst approving the devotion, by a decree of the S. Congreg. of Rites of Aug. 31, 1805, granted also an office and Mass for the feast of it, to kindle thereby the love of the faithful towards it.

 

In the year 1807, in order still more to advance this devotion, he erected in Rome, in the deaconry of St. Eustachius, a “Primary Congregation” (Congregazione Primario) of the Sacred Heart of Mary,” granting to its members many Indulgences, with power to aggregate other confraternities out of Rome, which should also participate in the Indulgences. Moreover, in order that not only the members of both sexes of the said confraternities and congregations in Rome and elsewhere, but that all the faithful every where, might he moved to honour the Sacred Heart of Mary, the same Pope Pius VII., at the prayer of many bishops and priests, by Rescripts given from the Segretaria of the Memorials, Aug. 18, 1807, Fen. 1, 1816, and Sept. 26, 1817 (all of which are preserved in the Archivium of the Pious Union of the Sacred Heart of Jesus before named), granted—

 

i. The indulgence of sixty days, once a day, to all who say devoutly the following prayer to the Sacred Heart of Mary, with the act of praise to the SS. Hearts of Jesus and Mary; and—

 

ii. The plenary indulgence to those who say it every day for a year, on each of the following three feasts of our Lady, viz., the Nativity, Assumption, and her Immaculate Heart provided that, after Confession and Communion, they visit a church or altar dedicated to the Blessed Virgin and pray there according to the Pope’s intention.

 

Lastly, he granted—

 

iii. The plenary indulgence at the hour of death to all who in life shall not omit to say this prayer.

 

THE PRAYER.

 

Heart of Mary, Mother of God and our Mother, Heart most amiable, on which the adorable Trinity ever gazes with complacency, worthy of all the veneration and tenderness of angels and of men; Heart most like the Heart of Jesus, whose most perfect image thou art; Heart full of goodness, ever compassionate towards our miseries; vouchsafe to thaw our icy hearts, that they may be wholly changed to the likeness of the Heart of Jesus. Infuse into them the love of thy virtues, inflame them with that blessed fire with which thou dost ever burn. In thee let the Holy Church find safe shelter; protect it and be its sweet asylum, its tower of strength, impregnable against every inroad of its enemies. Be thou the road leading to Jesus; be thou the channel whereby we receive all graces needful for our salvation. Be thou our help in need, our comfort in trouble, our strength in temptation, our refuge in persecution, our aid in all dangers; but especially in the last struggle of our life, at the moment of our death, when all hell shall be unchained against us to snatch away our souls: in that dread moment, that hour so terrible, whereon our eternity depends, ah, then, most tender Virgin, make us feel how great is the tenderness of thy maternal Heart, and how mighty thy power with the Heart of Jesus, opening to us a safe refuge in the very fount of mercy itself, that so we too may join with thee in Paradise in blessing that same Heart of Jesus for ever and for ever. Amen.

 

ACT OF PRAISE TO THE HEARTS OF JESUS AND MARY.

 

May the Divine Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary be known, praised, blessed, loved, worshipped, and glorified always and in all places! Amen. (pp. 142-43)

 

 

EJACULATION, “SWEET HEART OF MARY,” ETC.

 

At the humble prayer of a pious promoter of the devotion to the Sacred Heart of Mary, our Sovereign Pontiff Pius IX., by a decree of the S. Congr. of Indulgences, dated Sept. 30, 1852, granted to the faithful—

 

i. An indulgence of 300 days, every time they say with a contrition and devotion the following ejaculation.

ii. A plenary indulgence, once a month, to all who say it daily devoutly for a month; provided that, after Confession and Communion, they visit a church or public oratory, and pray there according to the mind of his Holiness.

 

THE EJACULATION.

 

Sweet heart of Mary, be my salvation. (pp. 143-44)

 

 

LITTLE CHAPLET IN HONOUR OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY

 

His Holiness Pope Pius IX., in order that the fervour of the devotion of the faithful might be the more inflamed towards the Sacred and Immaculate Heart of Mary, granted at the prayer of the Bishop of Verona—

 

i. An Indulgence of 300 days, once a day, to every one who should say with a contrite heart the following little chaplet.

 

ii. A plenary indulgence to all who have the devout custom of saying it once a day; to be gained once a month, on the day when, after Confession and Communion, they shall visit a church or public oratory, and pray there for a while according to the mind of his Holiness. See decree of the S. Congreg. of Indulgences, Dec. 11, 1854.

 

THE LITTLE CHAPLET.

 

V. Deus in adjutorium meum intendo. (O God, I see your help)

R. Domine ad adjuvandum me festina. (O Lord, hurry to help me)

V. Gloria Patri, &c.

R. Sicut erat, &c.

 

i. Immaculate Virgin, who, being conceived without sin, didst direct every movement of thy pure heart to God, ever the object of thy love, and who wast ever most submissive to His will; obtain for me the grace to hate sin with my whole heart, and to learn of thee to live in perfect resignation to the will of God.

One Pater, & c.; Heart of Mary, &c.

 

Heart of Mary, pierced with grief, set my heart on fire with the love of God.

Or else,
My heart, O heart of Mary,
Sore pierced for me with pain,
With burning fire of charity,
Cleanse thou from sinful stain
.

 

ii. Mary, I wonder at thy deep humility, troubling thy blessed heart at the gracious message brought thee by Gabriel the Archangel, how that thou wast chosen to be Mother of the Son of God Most High, and making thee proclaim thyself His humble handmaid; and, in great confusion at my pride, I ask thee for the grace of a contrite humbled heart, that, knowing my own misery, I may obtain that crown of glory promised to those who are truly humble of heart.

One Pater, & c.; Heart of Mary, &c.

 

iii. Sweetest Heart of Mary, precious treasury, wherein the Blessed Virgin kept the words of Jesus whilst she thought upon the high mysteries which she had heard from the lips of her Son, and whereby she learned to live for God alone; how does the coldness of my heart confound me! Dearest Mother, obtain for me grace so to mediate within my heart upon the holy law of God, that I may strive to follow thee in the fervent practice of every Christian virtue.

One Pater, & c.; Heart of Mary, &c.

 

iv. Glorious Queen of Martyrs, whose sacred heart was cruelly transfixed in the bitter Passion of thy Son by the sword foretold by the holy old man Simeon, obtain for my heart true courage and a holy patience to bear well the troubles and adversities of this miserable life, and, by crucifying my flesh with its desires in following the mortifications of the cross, to show myself truly thy one.

One Pater, & c.; Heart of Mary, &c.

 

v. O Mary, Mystic Rose, whose loving heart, burning with the living fire of charity, accepted us for thy sons at the foot of the cross, whereby thou didst become our most tender Mother; make me fee the sweetness of thy maternal heart, and thy power with Jesus in all the perils of this moral life, and especially in the terrible hour of death, so that my heart, united with thine, may love Jesus now and throughout all ages. Amen.

One Pater, & c.; Heart of Mary, &c.

 

Let us entreat the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus to inflame us with His holy love O Divine Heart of Jesus, I consecrate myself to Thee, full of deep gratitude for the many blessings I have received, and daily receive, from Thy infinite charity. I thank Thee with my whole heart for having also vouchsafed to give me thine own Mother to be my Mother, consigning me to her as son in the person of the beloved disciple. Grant unto me that my heart may be ever ardently inflamed with this love of Thee, and that it may ever find it Thy most sweet Heart its peace, its refuge, and its happiness. (pp. 157-58)

 

 

THE HYMN “STABAT MATER.”

 

The “venerable” Pope Innocent XI., desirous that all faithful Christians should often call to mind the bitter sorrow endured by most holy Mary whilst she stood beneath the cross of her divine Son Jesus, entreating her through that great sorrow of hers to obtain for them spiritual favours in their life and in their death,--granted, by his Brief, Commissae nobis, of Sept. 1, 1861—

 

An indulgence of 100 days to all the faithful every time that, in honor of the sorrow of the B. V. Mary, they devoutly say the sequence or hymn Stabat Mater, a hymn which, * though not composed by St. Gregory the Great or St. Bonaventure, as some suppose, yet acknowledge for its author the learned Pope Innocent III., as attested by many writers of great authority.

 

* Benedict XIV. on the Feat of our Lord and B.V.M. Part ii. cap. iv. § 1, at the end.

 

. . .

 

Sancta Mater istud agas,
Crucifixi fige plagas
Cordi meo valide.

 

. . .

 

Holy Mother! pierce me through;
In my heart each wound renew
Of my Saviour crucified. (pp. 163, 164, 166)

 

 

FIFTH NOVENA.

IN PREPARATION FOR THE FEAST OF THE ASSUMPTION.

(Beginning Aug. 6.)

 

. . .

 

SIXTH DAY. Aug. 11.

 

. . .

 

GLORY OF MARY AFTER DEATH.

 

In her Assumption into heaven.

 

Let us meditate how gloriously Mary was taken up to Heaven, being escorted thither by many legions of the heavenly host and of blessed souls drawn by her merits out of Purgatory; and rejoicing in that majestic triumph, let us with all humility offer to her our supplications:

 

i. Great Queen, who wast assumed so royally into the Kingdom of eternal peace ; obtain for us that all sordid, earthly thoughts be taken away from us, and our hearts be fixed upon the contemplation of the unchangeable happiness of Heaven.

Three Ave Marias.

 

ii. Great Queen, who wast assumed to Heaven amidst a company of the Angelic Hierarchy; obtain for us strength to overcome the wiles of all our enemies, and that we may lend a docile ear to the counsels of that good angel who continually assists and governs us.

Three Ave Marias.

 

iii. Great Queen, who wast assumed to Heaven most gloriously, in the company of souls drawn by thy merits out of Purgatory ; free us from the slavery of sin, and make us worthy to praise thee for all eternity. Ave Maria thrice. Let us not cease to applaud the royal triumph of Mary ; and uniting our homage with the sixth Choir of angels, let us honour the singular glory of her Assumption into Heaven, while we say:

 

Litanies, Then V. and R. and Oremus as before.

 

SEVENTH DAY.  Aug. 12.

 

. . .

 

GLORY OF MARY AFTER DEATH.

 

In her Assumption into heaven.

 

Let us meditate how glorious Mary is in Heaven, because she is enthroned there as Queen of the universe, "and is ever receiving homage and veneration from countless hosts of angels and of saints; and assisting at her royal throne, let us implore her aid:

 

i. Sovereign Queen of the universe, who for thy incomparable merit art raised to such high glory in the heavens; in thy pity look upon our miseries, and rule us with the gentle sway of thy protection, Ave Maria thrice. Sovereign Queen of the universe, who art ever receiving- worship and homage from all the heavenly host; accept, we pray thee, these our invocations, offered with such reverence as befits thy dignity and greatness.

Three Ave Marias.

 

ii. Sovereign Queen of the universe, by that glory which thou hast by reason of thy high place in Heaven; vouchsafe to take us into the number of thy servants, and obtain for us grace that with quick and ready will we may faithfully keep the precepts of God our Lord.

Three Ave Marias.

 

iii. Let us take part in the joy of the angels praising Mary, and rejoice with the seventh Choir, because we know that she is raised to the dignity of Queen of the universe, while with the seventh choir we sing:

 

Litanies. Then V. and R. and Oremus as before.

 

EIGHTH DAY. Aug. 13.

 

. . .

 

GLORY OF MARY AFTER DEATH.

 

For the crown which decks her brow.

 

Let us meditate how glorious Mary is in Heaven by reason of the royal crown wherewith her divine Son has crowned her, and for the full knowledge which she now has of the deep mysteries of GOD, past, present and to come; and full of veneration for the incomparable honour bestowed upon our Queen, let us have recourse to her and say:

 

i. Queen unrivalled, who in Heaven above dost enjoy the high glory of being crowned by thy divine Son with a royal diadem ; help us to share thy matchless virtues, and ask for us that, purified in heart, we may be made worthy to be crowned with thee in Paradise.

Three Ave Marias.

 

ii. Queen unrivalled, in the full knowledge granted thee of all things on earth ; for thy own glory’s sake obtain pardon for our past evil deeds, that we may never offend again by froward tongue or wanton thought. Ave Maria thrice. Queen unrivalled, whose desire it is to see men pure and clean of heart, that so they may be made worthy of thy GOD; obtain for us forgiveness of our sins, and help us, that all our looks, words and deeds may please his heavenly Majesty.

Three Ave Marias.

 

iii. Let us then purify our hearts, in order that we may be worthy to give praise to Mary; and to the glory she possesses in that bright crown which decks her royal brow, let us add humble tokens of our love, rejoicing in union with the eighth choir we joyfully sing:

 

Litanies. Then V. and R. and Oremus as before.

 

NINTH DAY. Aug. 14.

 

. . .

 

GLORY OF MARY AFTER DEATH.

 

In her patronage of man.

 

Let us meditate how glorious Mary is in Heaven by reason of her patronage of man, and for the power she has to aid him with great watchfulness in all his necessities ; wherefore with lively confidence in the patronage of the very Mother of our GOD, let us implore her aid.

 

i. Mary, our most powerful patroness, whose glory it is in Heaven to be the advocate of man; oh! take us from the hands of the enemy and place us in the arms of our GOD and CREATOR.

Three Ave Marias.

 

ii. Mary, our most powerful patroness, who being in Heaven the advocate of men wouldst that all men should be saved; make it thy care that none of us succumb at the thought of our past relapses into sin.

Three Ave Marias.

 

iii. Mary, our most powerful patroness, who to fulfil thy office dost love to be continually invoked by men; obtain for us such true devotion that we may ever call upon thee in life, and above all at the awful moment of our death. Ave Maria thrice. Now with all our hearts let us celebrate the glories of Mary; and consoled at having- Mary for our advocate in Heaven, let us join in the ninth choir of the angels in praying her while we sing:

 

Litanies. Then V. and R. and Oremus as before. (pp. 186, 192-95)

 

 

 

Paragraphs 967-970 of the Catechism on Mary’s current “saving office”:

 

… she is our Mother in the order of grace

 

967 By her complete adherence to the Father’s will, to his Son’s redemptive work, and to every prompting of the Holy Spirit, the Virgin Mary is the Church’s model of faith and charity. Thus she is a “preeminent and … wholly unique member of the Church”; indeed, she is the “exemplary realization” (typus) of the Church. (2679; 507)

 

968 Her role in relation to the Church and to all humanity goes still further. “In a wholly singular way she cooperated by her obedience, faith, hope, and burning charity in the Savior’s work of restoring supernatural life to souls. For this reason she is a mother to us in the order of grace.” (494)

 

969 “This motherhood of Mary in the order of grace continues uninterruptedly from the consent which she loyally gave at the Annunciation and which she sustained without wavering beneath the cross, until the eternal fulfilment of all the elect. Taken up to heaven she did not lay aside this saving office but by her manifold intercession continues to bring us the gifts of eternal salvation.… Therefore the Blessed Virgin is invoked in the Church under the titles of Advocate, Helper, Benefactress, and Mediatrix.” (149; 501; 1370)

 

970 “Mary’s function as mother of men in no way obscures or diminishes this unique mediation of Christ, but rather shows its power. But the Blessed Virgin’s salutary influence on men … flows forth from the superabundance of the merits of Christ, rests on his mediation, depends entirely on it, and draws all its power from it.” “No creature could ever be counted along with the Incarnate Word and Redeemer; but just as the priesthood of Christ is shared in various ways both by his ministers and the faithful, and as the one goodness of God is radiated in different ways among his creatures, so also the unique mediation of the Redeemer does not exclude but rather gives rise to a manifold cooperation which is but a sharing in this one source.”514 (2008; 1545; 308)[7]

 

 

 

 

Alphonsus Liguori (1696-1787): Additional Prayers to Mary in the Context of Eucharistic Adoration

 

Source:

 

Alphonsus Liguori, Visits to the Blessed Sacrament and the Blessed Virgin Mary (Rockford, Ill.: TAN Books, 2012)

 

Graces Obtained through Visits to The Blessed Virgin Mary

 

In Father Auriemma’s little book, Affetti Scambievoli (p. 2, c. 3), we read of innumerable favors granted by the Mother of God to those who practiced the most profitable devotion of often visiting her in her churches or before some image. We read of the graces which she granted in these visits to Blessed Albert the Great, to the Abbot Rupert, to Father Suarez—especially when she obtained for them the gif of understanding, by which they afterward became so renowned throughout the Church for their great learning. We read of the graces which she granted to the Venerable [now St.] John Berchmans of the Society of Jesus who was in the daily habit of visiting Mary in a chapel of the Roman College; he declared that he renounced all earthly love, to love no other after God than the Most Blessed Virgin, and he had written at the foot of an image of his beloved Lady: “I will never rest until I shall have obtained a tender love for my Mother.” We read also of the graces when she granted to Bernadine of Siena, who in his youth also went every day to visit her in a chapel near the city gate and declared that the Lady had ravished his heart. Hence he called her his beloved and said that he could not do less than visit her often; and by her means he afterward obtained the grace to renounce the world and to become what he afterward was, a great Saint and the apostle of Italy.

 

Do you, then, be also careful always to join to your daily visit to the Most Blessed Sacrament a visit to the most holy Virgin Mary in some church, or at least before a devout image of her in your own house. If you do this with tender affection and confidence, you may hope to receive great things from this most gracious Lady, who as St. Andrews of Crete says, always bestows great gifts on those who offer her even the last act of homage (In Dorm. B.V., s 3).

 

Mary, queen of Sweetest hope,
Who can e’er forget thee?
By thy mercy, by thy love,
Have pity, Queen, on me! (pp. xxiii-xxv)

 

Prayer To Our Lady After Each Visit

 

Most holy Virgin Immaculate, my Mother Mary, it is to you, who are the Mother of My Lord, the Queen of the world, the advocate, the hope and the refuge of sinners, that I have recourse today, I, who most of all am deserving of pity. Most humbly do I offer you my homage, O great Queen, and I thank you for all the graces you have obtained for me until now, and particularly for having saved me from Hell, which, by my sins, I have so often deserved.

 

I love you, O most lovable Lady, and because of my love for you, I promise to serve you always and to do all in my power to win others to love you also. In your hands I place all my hopes; I entrust the salvation of my soul to your care. Accept me as your servant, O Mother of Mercy; receive me under your mantle. And since you have such power with God, deliver me from all temptations, or rather, obtain for me the strength to triumph over them until death. Of you I ask the grace of perfect love for Jesus Christ. Through help I hope to die a happy death. O my Mother, I beg you, by the love you bear to God, to help me at all times, but especially at the last moment of my life. Do not leave me, I beseech you, until you see me sae in Heaven, blessing you and singing your mercies for all eternity.

 

Amen, so I hope, so may it be. (pp. 3-4)

 

Our own most loving Lady, the whole Church declares you to be our hope and salutes you under that title. Since you are the hope of us all, be my hope too. T. Bernard called you the whole foundation of his hope and said: let him who is in despair, hope in Mary. And so will I too address you: My own Mary, you save even those who are in despair; in you I place all my hope. (p. 23)

 

Allow me, too, my most sweet Queen, to call you, with your own St. Bernard, the whole ground of my hope, and to say with St. John Damascene that I have placed all my hope in you. You must obtain for me the forgiveness of my sins, perseverance until death and deliverance from Purgatory. It is through you that all who are saved obtain their salvation. And so, O Mary, it is you who must save me. He whom you wish to be saved, will be saved. Only wish my salvation, and I shall be saved. You save all those who call on you. I am now calling on you and say to you:

Aspiration: O salvation of those who call on you, save me! (p. 46)

 

The saintly Bernadine de Bustis says: “Do not despair, O Sinner, but go with confidence to Our Lady. You will find her hands filled with grace and mercy.” “And remember,” he adds, “that is Queen, who is so full of sympathy, is more anxious to help and assist you than you yourself can be that she should do so.” O my Lady, I always thank God for having taught me about you. I should be unfortunate indeed if I did not know of you, or if I were to forget you. My very salvation would be in danger. O my Mother, I bless you, I love you. And so great is the confidence I have in you that I entrust my soul to your keeping.

Aspiration: O Mary, happy is the one who knows you and puts his trust in you! (p. 58)

 

My most gracious Lady and Mother, by committing sin I have rebelled against your Son. Btu I am sorry, and I appeal to your mercy to obtain forgiveness for me. Do not say that you have not the power. St. Bernard says that you are the mediatrix who obtains forgiveness for us. It is your duty to help those who are in the danger, for St. Ephrem calls you the helper of those in peril. And who, my Lady, is in greater danger than I? I have lost God and have certainly deserved Hell. I do not know if God has yet forgiven me. I may lose Him again. But you can obtain everything for me, and it is through you that I hope for every favor, for pardon, perseverance and paradise. I hope, in Heaven, to be among those of the blessed who will be loudest in praising your mercy because you will have saved me in your prayers.

Aspiration: I will sing the mercy of Mary for eternity. I will sing of it forever and ever. Amen. (pp. 68-69)

 

 

 



[1] Henry Denzinger and Karl Rahner, eds., The Sources of Catholic Dogma, trans. Roy J. Deferrari (St. Louis, MO: B. Herder Book Co., 1954), 300.

[2] Joseph Pohle and Arthur Preuss, The Sacraments:  A Dogmatic Treatise, vol. 3, Dogmatic Theology (St. Louis, MO; London: B. Herder, 1918), 234.

[3] William Kent, “Indulgences,” in The Catholic Encyclopedia: An International Work of Reference on the Constitution, Doctrine, Discipline, and History of the Catholic Church, ed. Charles G. Herbermann et al. (New York: The Encyclopedia Press; The Universal Knowledge Foundation, 1907–1913).

[4] Ludwig Ott, Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma (St. Louis: Bischöfliches Seminar St. Willibald, Copyright Baronius Press, 1957), 441.

[5] Catholic Church, Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition (Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2019), 370.

[6] Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province, vol. 9 (London: Burns Oates & Washbourne, n.d.), 569.

[7] Catholic Church, Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition (Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2019), 252–253.

Blog Archive