Tuesday, January 3, 2023

Lowell L. Bennion on the Importance of the Old Testament

  

The Old Testament is the foundation of much that is best in our Christian civilization.

 

A. Christ knew it thoroughly and quoted it frequently.

B. It is referred to with appreciation throughout the New Testament.

C. Christianity includes the finest in the Old Testament, as is evident from the retention of the Old Testament as part of the Christian Bible.

D. Latter-day Saints, especially through the Book of Mormon and modern revelation, having additional and strong ties with both the Old Testament and the house of Israel.

E. Much of our moral legal code has come to us through the Old Testament law.

F. The Old Testament concept of obedience to law, which was encouraged in Western Civilization, helped to lay the foundation for the rise of both experimental science and modern industry, both of which are based on a type of obedience to principle and to law.

G. Much of our worship and great music is inspired of the Psalms and the Prophets. (Oratorios, such as Handel’s Messiah and Mendelssohn’s Elijah, are based essentially on Old Testament texts.)

H. The very language of the Bible has played a large role in the development of modern languages and literature among the common peoples. (High German, for example, received great impetus through Martin Luther’s fine translation of the Bible into German.) The King James Bible translation of 1611 has affected the English language tremendously and for good. (Lowell L. Bennion, “Lesson One: Teaching Helps,” in Roy A. Welker, Spiritual Values of the Old Testament: M Man-Gleaner Course of Study 1961-62 [Salt Lake City: L.D.S. Department of Education, 1961], 13-14)

 

Roy A. Welker (LDS) on the Nature of Prophecy

  

Prophecy is often conditional—prophecy does not cause events to take place, but the prophet is inspired to foresee the consequences of certain conditions. If people believe, and change, the future will shape up differently. (Roy A. Welker, Spiritual Values of the Old Testament: M Man-Gleaner Course of Study 1961-62 [Salt Lake City: L.D.S. Department of Education, 1961], 160)

 

Divine prophecy often has more meaning in it than meets the eye of the finite mind. This fact is evidenced by the various interpretations is so often arouses. Jesus upon occasion, had to explain some of His utterances which His disciples, for lack of understanding, and comprehension, could not interpret. Time, which man tries to utilize for his own advantage and apply to his immediate concern, is not always of such considerable moment to the prophet. His prophecy may require a brief or a remote period for its fulfillment—it may be partially fulfilled in one and completed in another era of time. When uttered under the inspiration of the Spirit of God it will find its true fulfillment no matter what the wisdom of man may indicate. (Roy A. Welker, Spiritual Values of the Old Testament: M Man-Gleaner Course of Study 1961-62 [Salt Lake City: L.D.S. Department of Education, 1961], 331)

 

Martin L. Braden (LDS) On Revelation 12

  

Revelations [sic] 12:6, 14

 

6 And the woman (the true Church and Bride) fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days )JST said Years instead of Days)

 

14 And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent.

 

The woman feeling into the wilderness is symbolic of the ancient Church being driven into the wilderness by Satan, which began the Great Apostasy, where the authority of the priesthood was taken from the earth following the deaths of Jesus Christ and His apostles. The religious leaders serving the seven churches or congregations established at the time of Paul and the early apostles, also died off and were replaced over-and-over again with flawed men, leading without a ‘prophet head’ receiving revelation for the entire Church. In time the result was men, who were without direct authority and revelation, calling other men to lead the Church, so that the doctrine Jesus taught soon became diluted and corrupted as the years went by Apostasy soon gave way to the false doctrine that there was no longer a need for revelation not for prophets or apostles to lead the Church, which doctrine took away the Church’s foundational rock upon which Christ built His Church. No longer was the Church firmly fixed on ‘Jesus and His rock of revelation’ and the leadership Jesus Christ Himself had established. (Martin L. Braden, An Atheist’s Delusion: A Latter-day Saint’s Perspective on Richard Dawkins’ Anti-Theist/Anti-Christ Book the God Delusion [MLB Publications, 2022], 191)

 

Joseph Smith teaching Baptismal Regeneration as Being Definitional to the Gospel (April 13, 1843)

George Laub, on p. 31 of his reminiscences and journal, recorded Joseph Smith as teaching the following on April 13, 1843:


 

and if any other man preach any other gospel then this and the baptism for the remision of sins and the laying on of hands for the reception of the holy ghost let him be anathamised or acursed accursed the curs of god shall be upon him or them

 





Jacob Gates on the Spiritual Outpouring on the Congregation when D&C 132 was First Read in London (December 26, 1852)


We met at an early house in the Freemasons’ Hall. The morning was taken up partly with business and partly with instruction. The afternoon after the meeting was opened, I arose and addressed the people to prepare them for the reading of the revelation given to Joseph Smith in Nauvoo on July 12, 1843, on the plurality of wives. After I had spoken some time, the Spirit of God poured out upon me copiously. The same spirit seemed to prevail on the whole congregation. Its influence was wonderful. At the close of my remarks, I asked the people if they felt prepared to receive anything, and if they were, to say “Amen.” Such a response was never heard before. The whole house rang with the voices of twelve or fourteen hundred people. I then called upon James Marsdon to read. He arose and read distinctly while the people listened with breathless silence. Thus, for the time was this revelation read in the great city of London. (Jacob Gates, Journal, December 26, 1852, in The Journals of Jacob Gates, ed. KC Kern, 275-76)

 


Monday, January 2, 2023

Jacob Gates Recording Speaking in Tongues and Demon Possession/Exorcism in March 1836

  

THU, 17 MAR 1836—We left Brother Dade’s and went to Brother John Lansaw’s, where we took dinner. We went to Brother Sims’s, and from there we went to Brother Hanks’s, where we held a meeting. We had a powerful scene: the Holy Ghost fell upon the congregation, so that they spake with tongues and prophesied. . . . (Jacob Gates, Journal, March 17, 1386, in The Journals of Jacob Gates, ed. KC Kern, 26)

 

 

We dismissed meeting and started towards the home of one of the brethren. We had not gone far before we heard a great cry from a young woman who howled and wept. We were called back to the house, where we found her. She was in great distress because the spirit of God was striving with her, but notwithstanding this, she suffered the spirits of the devil to take possession of her heart. In consequence of this, her whole frame did shake. We prayed for her and the spirit of the devil was rebuked, and she became calm. We left her, and returned home. (Jacob Gates, Journal, March 18, 1836, in The Journals of Jacob Gates, ed. KC Kern, 27)

 

Sunday, January 1, 2023

Notes from Albert Schlitzer, Redemptive Incarnation

  

. . . Christ as Priest exercises perfectly His mediatorial office. In the name of mankind He worships God to the full measure in which God deserves to be worshipped. As a man and in the name of all mankind, Christ acknowledges that He, a man, is nothing, apart from God. As the new Head of the human race, the Second Adam, He gives mankind back to God. This recognition of God’s supreme dominion, and the total yielding up of one’s self to the Supreme Being consequent upon that recognition, are at the very core of religion. It constitutes, in fact, what is called the virtue of religion. For religion means a binding back to God, a return of the creature to God, where he belongs. Religion, then, is nothing less than right order. With good reason St. Thomas argues that it is a form of the virtue of justice. Christ, fulfilling perfectly the obligation woven into the very nature of man stands out above all men as The Religious, The Just Man.

 

As Priest, Christ faces God in the name of man; as Priest He also faces man in the name of God. He exercises His priestly office by giving man the gifts of God and even the gift of God Himself. Truly Christ is the one Mediator, the center, the point of meeting between God and men, because He is God and man. He is the Pontiff, that is, the Bridge between God and men. Through Him God comes to man. God will come through no other way. Through Him man goes to God. There is no other way for man to reach God or to worship Him.

 

The priestly or sacerdotal character of Christ, therefore, shows clearly how completely dedicated is His life. A life that is initially dedicated to the Father; a life that is totally dedicated to mankind.

 

Sacredness thoroughly pervades the office of the priest. The term “sacerdotal” frequently used as the equivalent of “priestly” indicates plainly the sacredness of the work of the priest. The priesthood authorizes a man to handle sacred or holy things. God is essentially holy. No other being is holy or sacred except by reason of some relationship to the All Holy. Whatever belongs to God is holy. It can belong to God either because it is God’s gift to man, or because, through God’s sanctification and generous acceptance of it, it becomes man’s gift to God for the sake of adoring and pleasing Him. The sacred office of the priest, then, is bi-polarized, bringing down God’s blessings to man, and carrying up to God what man owes to Him.  (Albert Schlitzer, Redemptive Incarnation: Sources and Their Theological Development in the Study of Christ [3d ed.; Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1962], 262-63)

 

Martin Luther desired to give all glory to Christ, but thought this required that he deny any good in man. As a matter of fact, however, his conception of the manner in which Christ’s redemption is applied to individuals belittles Christ’s redemptive action and robs Him of His true glory. Christ did not come to destroy life, but to give it, to increase it. His glory does not need the reduction of man’s action to nothingness, but rather in the transforming and validating of it through giving him internally a share of His own life and merits. One does not truly glorify the action of the Creator by denying all true being and causality in creatures; rather the glory of the Creator consists in communicating a share in His being and in His causality. Similarly, one does not truly glorify the all-sufficiency of the Redeemer’s satisfaction and merits by refuting to recognize genuine expiation and merit in the redeemed. Rather, the glory of Christ requires the recognition that Christ through His work for us enabled us to share in His work. The meaning of those who are justified in Christ in no way adds to the value of the merits of Christ, no more than the being and action of the finite creature add to the being and action of the infinite Creator. Just as the Creator’s action is in the creature so that he may act, so the merits of Christ are in the Christian to enable him to merit and make amends for his sins before God. Since this is the ultimate purpose of Christ’s redeeming action for us, we can safely say that Christ’s merits are incomplete without our merits. This seems to be implied in the saying of St. Paul, “He was reconciled you in His body of flesh through His death, to present you holy and undefiled and irreproachable before Him . . . I rejoice now in the sufferings I bear for your sake; and what is lacking of the sufferings of Christ I will up in my flesh for His body, which is the Church . . . “

 

This true meriting on the part of the Christian and through the merits of Christ is understandable only on the basis of the intimate union between Christ and the redeemed. Christ spoke of this intimate union under the figure of the vine and the branches: the vine communicates its own vitality to the branches. St. Paul inspired b the Spirit of Christ speaks of this same intimate union between Christ and Christians under the figure of a human body: Christ is the Head, we are the body, His members. The life which is in the “Head” expresses itself through the body: “In him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead . . . and In him . . . you have received of that fullness. In him, too, you have been circumcised with a circumcision not wrought by hand, but through the putting off of the body of the flesh, a circumcision which is of Christ . . . And you, when you were dead by reason of your sins, and the uncircumcision of your flesh, be brought to life along him, forgiving all your sins . . . Indeed he has taken it completely away, nailing it to the cross . . .(He who is) united to the head, from whom the whole body, supplied and built up by joints and ligaments, attains a growth that is of God.” (Albert Schlitzer, Redemptive Incarnation: Sources and Their Theological Development in the Study of Christ [3d ed.; Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1962], 307-9)

 

Blog Archive