One of the most popular modern work defending the so-called Biblical Unitarian perspective is that of Anthony F. Buzzard, Jesus was not a Trinitarian: A Call to Return to the Creed of Jesus (Restoration Fellowship, 2007). This book was critiqued by David Paulsen et al. in a review entitled, “Jesus was not a Unitarian.” While I believe Paulsen et al. relied a bit too much on the flawed work of Bowman and Komoszewski, Putting Jesus in His Place and did not seem to “get” everything Buzzard wrote about the issue of “my lord” in Psa 110:1 (Hebrew אדֹנִי adoni as opposed to אֲדֹנָי adonai meaning “[sovereign] Lord,” a substitution for Yahweh), the review does a very good job in (1) refuting many of the arguments forwarded by Buzzard for strict, ontological monotheism and (2) shows much of the biblical foundations for Latter-day Saint theology.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(290)
-
▼
May
(20)
- Is Latter-day Saint Christology "Arian"?
- Tad R. Callister vs. Book of Mormon as "Inspired F...
- Does Romans 3:11 teach Total Depravity?
- Robert Sungenis vs. Justification being forensic
- The LDS Doctrine of Pre-existence and Genesis 2:7
- The Grammar of John 1:1c
- Paul Veyne on the existence of other gods in the B...
- τρωγω in John 6: Proof of Transubstantiation?
- Hebrews 6:4-9: Only Hypothetical?
- Brigham Young's Sermons
- NET on Genesis 20:13
- G.K. Beale on Jesus as "the Lord of Glory"
- Latter-day Saints have Chosen the True Biblical Jesus
- Jesus was not a Unitarian
- NT Elias being a "Forerunner"
- Early Christian Authors vs. the Trinity
- Does Isaiah really support Trinitarian Theologies?
- Paul vs. Eternal Security
- Insights from F.F. Bruce on the Apostle Paul's The...
- The rhetoric of Isaiah and the supremacy of Yahweh
-
▼
May
(20)