"And he has added, 'But if grace, it is no longer on the basis of works.' [Romans 11:6] One should know that the works that Paul repudiates and frequently criticizes are not the works of righteousness that are commanded in the law, but those in which those who keep the law according to the flesh boast; i.e., the circumcision of the flesh, the sacrificial rituals, the observance of Sabbaths or new moon festivals. [Cf. Colossians 2:18] These, then, and works of this nature are the ones on the basis of which he says no one can be saved, [cf. Ephesians 2:8-9] and concerning which he says in the present passage, 'not on the basis of works; otherwise grace would no longer be grace.' [Romans 11:6] For if anyone is justified through these, he is not justified gratis. But these works are by no means sought from the one who is justified through grace; but this one should take care that the grace he has received should not be in him 'in vain,' as Paul also says, 'For his grace in me was not in vain but I worked harder than any of them.' And again he adds, as one mindful of grace, 'Not I, but the grace of God with me.' [1 Corinthians 15:10] So then, one does not make grace become in vain who joins works to it that are worthy and who does not show himself ungrateful for the grace of God. For anyone who sins after having attained grace becomes ungrateful to him who offered the grace."(My thanks to Errol Amey for bringing this quote to my attention)
(Origen, 'Commentary on Romans' 8:7:6, in 'Fathers of the Church' 104:159)
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Origen on Romans 11:6
Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(290)
-
▼
July
(32)
- The Conceptualization of Deity in the Hebrew Bible...
- The NET on John 3:13
- Polygamy, Deuteronomy 17:17, and Jacob 2:24
- Robert Morey on Sola Scriptura and 1 Corinthians 4:6
- Questions for a former LDS Revert to Roman Catholi...
- The Counterfeit Christ of Jason Wallace
- An Examination of Isaiah 29, John 10:16, and the B...
- Matthew Gordley on the use of passive verbs for Ch...
- Do the many "Lords" and "Gods" in 1 Corinthians 8:...
- "This is my Body": Proof of Transubstantiation?
- Acts 3:13 versus the Trinity
- Another reason why 2 Corinthians 5:21 does not sup...
- Does Paul's use of υπερ necessitate Penal Substitu...
- Søren Agersnap on 1 Corinthians 15:29
- The Doctrinal Differences Between Protestants: Min...
- Elden Watson’s Review of Bob Witte, Where Does it ...
- The lack of intellectual integrity of some pop LDS...
- The Identity of the “woman” in Revelation 12 in ea...
- Did Joseph Smith teach God exists in an “eternal n...
- The 1832 First Vision Account versus Modalism
- Critique of Dave Burke on John 17:5
- Blake Ostler's Critique of Cleon Skousen on the At...
- John 17:5 and the Personal Pre-Existence of Jesus
- 1995 CURE Debate on Sola Scriptura
- Does Genesis 31:15 Support Forensic Justification?
- Duncan Heaster on the Contingent Nature of Eschato...
- Ben Witherington on Marriage in the Hereafter
- Early Church Fathers versus Sola Fide
- Hebrews 10:12 in the Vulgate and Douay-Rheims
- Origen on Romans 11:6
- Is Repentance once-off for a believer?
- Revelation 2:21 versus Reformed Theology
-
▼
July
(32)