Scriptural Mormonism: Joseph Lawal (LDS) vs. Jeremiah Nortier (Reformed) Discuss/Debate Different Worldview Perspectives

Recently, my friend Joseph Lawal (of the LDS Philosophy youtube page) and Reformed Protestant Jeremiah Nortier had a dialogue/debate on Latter-day Saint vs. Reformed worldviews:

Joseph Lawal and Jeremiah Nortier: Different Worldview Perspectives

I asked two questions at the end during the audience Q&A: (1) Phinehas in Psa 106:30-31 which refutes Sola Fide and (2) Acts 2:38 and baptismal regeneration. Jeremiah failed on both questions, but said he would love to meet me. I recently PM'd him on facebook and I will happily debate him on baptismal regeneration, forensic justification, and sola scriptura.

On these issues, however, an interested party should pursue the following (among others on my blog):

Sola Scriptura

Not By Scripture Alone: A Latter-day Saint Refutation of Sola Scriptura (cf. Does 1 Corinthians 15:8 Support Sola Scriptura? - Nortier used this text to support Sola Scriptura during this debate)

Baptismal Regeneration:

Refuting Douglas Wilson on Water Baptism and Salvation

Baptism, Salvation, and the New Testament: John 3:1-7

Christ's baptism is NOT imputed to the believer

On Forensic Justification:

Response to a Recent Attempt to Defend Imputed Righteousness

Full Refutation of the Protestant Interpretation of John 19:30

Does LDS Theology Confuse the Relationship Between Justification and Sanctification?

Dave Bartosiewicz vs. Transformative Justification and Refutation of Dave Bartosiewicz on justification and the atonement being forensic