Monday, October 23, 2023

Peter Hemingray and Peter Bilello on Christ Offering, in Some Sense, a Sacrifice for Himself in Christadelphian Theology

When discussing the fourth doctrine to be rejected in the BASF ("That Christ was born with a 'free life'"), Peter Hemingray and Peter Bilello noted that:

 

The traditional view of Christadelphians is that Christ, like a High Priest, under the Law of Moses, sacrificed first for himself, then for the people—not that he had committed actual sin, but that, being human, he possessed a sin-prone nature—and that Christ died as an example to his followers both of how to follow God’s commandments, and of what the weaknesses of human nature merited, namely annihilation. “He also himself likewise took part” of the nature we bear, a nature related to death and producing temptations to sin (Heb 2:14). Had he chosen not to offer himself so that we could have hope of life, death would still have claimed him; his own salvation from death could not be considered apart from ours. Hence Jesus’ life was not “free” from the condemnation placed upon Adam and all his descendants, as has been claimed by those who allege that, unlike us, Jesus received his life direct from God, and it was never possible for him to die as a result of his own sin. (Peter Hemingray and Peter Bilello, Doctrines to Be Rejected: A Study in the Second Section of the Birmingham Amended Statement of Faith [Simi Valley, Calif.: The Christadelphian Tidings Publishing Co., 2023], 71)

 

Further Reading:

 

Listing of Articles on Christadelphian Issues

Blog Archive