Wednesday, April 17, 2024

Brant A. Gardner on Alma 18 and Lamoni’s Confusing Ammon with “the Great Spirit”

  

And it came to pass that king Lamoni caused that his servants should stand forth and testify to all the things which they had seen concerning the matter. And when they had all testified to the things which they had seen, and he had learned of the faithfulness of Ammon in preserving his flocks, and also of his great power in contending against those who sought to slay him, he was astonished exceedingly, and said: Surely, this is more than a man. Behold, is not this the Great Spirit who doth send such great punishments upon this people, because of their murders? (Alma 18:1-2)

 

 

Lamoni’s wonder is also completely normal; however, his response includes several seemingly odd speculations. Lamoni had seen Ammon in person, first as a helpless captive. He knew Ammon was a man. Why, then, would he immediately deduce that Ammon was “more than a man,” even “the Great Spirit”?

 

The line between human and divine in ancient Mesoamerican was less firmly drawn than in the modern Western world. Many Mesoamerican religious stories deal with exploits of individuals who are “more than men.” The hero twins of the Popol Vuh are certainly depicted as men, but they just as certainly have supernatural powers. [1] The Mixtec deity male 9 Wind is sown in the Codex Vindobonensis as a being in the heavens who descends and acts upon the earth. [2] The myriad legends surrounding the Aztec god Quetzalcoatl suggest that he had both a heavenly aspect and one in which he operates on earth as “more than a man.” [3] These “more than men” may be best understood as demi-gods, or deities that live and function on earth but who retain other-worldly powers. [4] It is in this lift that we should see King Lamoni’s speculation about Ammon—as one of the demi-gods familiar to him from Mesoamerican mythology.

 

Perplexingly, Lamoni characterizes “the Great Spirit” as sending “great punishments upon this people, because of their murders.” How did Lamoni see Ammon as punishing anyone? Rather, he was defending Lamoni’s honor and flocks. Even more puzzlingly, why would Lamoni connect Ammon’s heroic defense with murders committed by his (Lamanite) people? As I read this passage, Lamoni is speculating fairly wildly at this point. Demi-gods did not act logically, but rather for their own purposes and mysterious motives. Like Greek deities, Mesoamerican demi-gods’ presence among human beings was ambiguous at best. They were not always beneficial—indeed, were often malevolent. In Mesoamerica, a demi-god’s appearance would be, at the very least, risky even it were not immediately dangerous. Ammon’s prowess confirmed that he was dangerous. There was no guarantee that he would not just be as dangerous to Lamoni’s people as to Lamoni’s enemies.

 

But what would prompt a demi-god to come among them? Lamoni makes a connection between his political expedient of executing the servants and Ammon’s appearance. If the first event caused the second, then Ammon was probably angry. He had saved the current set of servants from being executed by his swift and bloody action at the waters of Sebus. Lamoni would certainly have known that his executed servants had not truly been at fault and obviously had a guilty conscience as a result. In fact, Lamoni tells the servants standing before him that Ammon had “come down at this time to preserve your lives, that I might not slay you as I did your brethren” (v. 4). (Brant A. Gardner, Second Witness: Analytical and Contextual Commentary on the Book of Mormon, 6 vols. [Salt Lake City: Greg Kofford Books, 2007], 4:281-82)

 

Notes for the Above:

 

[1] Popol Vuh: The Definitive Edition of the Mayan Book of the Dawn of Life and the Glories of Gods and Kings, translated by Dennis Tedlock (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1985), 140-48, provides some examples. The entire mythological section is applicable.

 

[2] Jill Leslie Furst Codex Vindobonensis Mexicanus I: A Commentary (Albany: Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, State University of New York at Albany, 1978), 106-8, plate 123.

 

[3] Brant A. Gardner, “Quetzalcoatl’s Fathers: A Critical Examination of Source Materials”; Alfredo López Austín, Hombre Díos (Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónima de México, 1972), 75-101.

 

[4] Lynn V. Foster, Handbook to Life in the Ancient Maya World (2002; rpt. in paperback, New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), 159.

 

Blog Archive