Saturday, May 2, 2026

Nedarim 32b on the Good and Evil Inclination (Yetzer ha-tov and Yetzer ha-ra’ah)

  

וְאָמַר רָמֵי בַּר אַבָּא, מַאי דִּכְתִיב: ״עִיר קְטַנָּה וַאֲנָשִׁים וְגוֹ׳״. ״עִיר קְטַנָּה״ — זֶה הַגּוּף, ״וַאֲנָשִׁים בָּהּ מְעַט״ — אֵלּוּ אֵבָרִים, ״וּבָא אֵלֶיהָ מֶלֶךְ גָּדוֹל וְסָבַב אֹתָהּ״ — זֶה יֵצֶר הָרָע, ״וּבָנָה עָלֶיהָ מְצוֹדִים וַחֲרָמִים״ — אֵלּוּ עֲוֹנוֹת,

 

And Rami bar Abba said: What is the meaning of that which is written: “There was a little city and few men in it, and there came a great king against it, and besieged it, and built great bulwarks against it. Now there was found in it a man poor and wise, and he by his wisdom delivered the city; yet no man remembered that same poor man” (Ecclesiastes 9:14–15)? “A little city,” this is referring to the body; “and few men in it,” this is referring to the limbs; “and there came a great king against it and besieged it,” this is referring to the evil inclination; “and built great bulwarks against it,” these are sins.

 

״וּמָצָא בָהּ אִישׁ מִסְכֵּן וְחָכָם״ — זֶה יֵצֶר טוֹב, ״וּמִלַּט הוּא אֶת הָעִיר בְּחׇכְמָתוֹ״ — זוֹ תְּשׁוּבָה וּמַעֲשִׂים טוֹבִים. ״וְאָדָם לֹא זָכַר אֶת הָאִישׁ הַמִּסְכֵּן הַהוּא״ — דְּבִשְׁעַת יֵצֶר הָרָע לֵית דְּמִדְּכַר לֵיהּ לְיֵצֶר טוֹב.

 

The Gemara expounds on the next section of the verse: “Now there was found in it a man poor and wise,” this is referring to the good inclination; “and he by his wisdom delivered the city,” this is referring to repentance and good deeds that are caused by the good inclination. “Yet no man remembered that same poor man” means that when the evil inclination overcomes the good inclination no one remembers the good inclination. (source)

 

Robert Alter on Proverbs 30:23

  

for a hateful woman in the marriage bed. In the Hebrew, “in the marriage bed” is a passive verb, which means “is married/is sexually possessed.” Fox’s proposal to revocalize the verb tibaʿel as tivʿal and to understand it as “gain mastery” is unconvincing because b-ʿ-l does not appear in this sense as an intransitive verb elsewhere (despite the noun baʿal, which does mean “master” as well as “husband”). The transitive verb generally has the sexual sense indicated above. The hateful woman enjoying conjugal consummation is part of a series of figures whose fate is disturbingly not what it should be, after the slave who rules and the scoundrel who prospers, and before the slavegirl who dispossesses her mistress. (Robert Alter, The Hebrew Bible, 3 vols. [New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2019], 3:448)

 

Friday, May 1, 2026

Ibn Ezra on Amos 9:12

  

למען - זה הפסוק הפוך הוא וככה פירושו למען יירשו ישראל את שארית אדום, וכל הגוים אחרי מות סנחריב ואם על המשיח ברור הדבר הוא. (source)

 

 

So that — this verse is inverted, and this is its meaning: so that Israel may inherit the remnant of Edom, and all the nations after the death of Sennacherib; and if it refers to the Messiah, the matter is clear.”

 

David Kimhi (Radak) on Amos 9:12

  

Radak on Amos 9:12:1

למען ירשו. הפסוק כמו הפוך למען ירשו אשר נקרא שמי עליהם את שארית אדום ר"ל אותם שנקרא שמי עליהם את אדום וטעם למען אמר אבנה אותה כימי עולם למען ירשו את אויביהם שכניהם והם אדום ופלשתים ומואב ועמון וזהו שאמר וכל הגוים וזהו שאמר כימי עולם כי דוד מלך ישראל שם באדום נציבים וכן השאר כולם הכניעם לפניו וכן יהיה לעתיד שירשו ישראל את הגוים ההם כמו שאמר בנבואת עובדיה וירשו הנגב את הר עשו וכן אמר בנבואת ישעיה אדום ומואב משלוח ידם ומה שאמר את שארית אדום ועובדיה אמר ולא יהיה שריד לבית עשו כן יהיה כי עם עשו לא יהיה להם שריד כי כולם יכלו לימות המשיח אבל את ארצם יירשו ישראל ולא כולה אלא שארית מה שלא יהיה ממנה חרבן עולם כי קצתה יהיה חרבן עולם לאות לדורות על שהרעו לישראל והם או אחיהם וקצתה ירשו אותה ישראל וישבו בה:

 

 

Radak on Amos 9:12:1

 

“‘So that they may possess’ — the verse is, as it were, inverted. Its meaning is: so that Israel may possess those upon whom My name is called, namely the remnant of Edom — that is, those upon whom My name is called among Edom. And the reason for ‘so that’ is: ‘I will rebuild it as in days of old, so that they may inherit their enemies, their neighbors, namely Edom, Philistia, Moab, and Ammon.’ This is what is meant by ‘and all the nations.’ And this is what is meant by ‘as in days of old,’ for King David set governors over Edom, and likewise he humbled all the rest before him. So too it will be in the future: Israel will inherit those nations, as it says in the prophecy of Obadiah, ‘And the south shall possess Mount Esau,’ and likewise in the prophecy of Isaiah, ‘Edom and Moab shall be the stretch of their hand.’

 

And as for what it says, ‘the remnant of Edom,’ whereas Obadiah said, ‘there shall be no survivor to the house of Esau,’ this will indeed be so, for the people of Esau will have no survivor, since all of them will perish in the days of the Messiah; but Israel will inherit their land, though not all of it, only the remnant of it, where there will not be a permanent ruin, for part of it will remain a perpetual desolation as a sign for future generations that they did evil to Israel — they and their brothers — and part of it Israel will inherit and dwell in.”

 

 

Radak on Amos 9:12:2

עושה זאת. הגזרה אני שאמרתיה אעשנה כי הכח בידי לעשות: (source)

 

 

Radak on Amos 9:12:2

 

“‘Who does this thing’ — I am the one who said it; I will do it, for the power to do so is in My hand.”

 

David Kimhi (Radak) on Amos 9:11


 

 

Radak on Amos 9:11:1

ביום ההוא. ביום הגאולה אקים את סוכת דוד הנופלת לפי שאמר מלכות אפרים תבטל אמר כי מלכות דוד תקום והיא הסוכה על דרך משל כי היא סוככת על העם: (source)

 

“On that day” — on the day of redemption I will raise up the fallen booth of David, because since he had said that the kingdom of Ephraim would be abolished, he said that the kingdom of David would arise. It is called a “booth” by way of metaphor, because it shelters the people.

 

 

Radak on Amos 9:11:1

וגדרתי את פרציהן. פרצי ישראל ואמר והריסותיו דרך כלל ואמר ובניתיה על הסוכה:

 

 

“And I will fence up their breaches” — the breaches of Israel. “And its ruins” — this is stated in a general way. “And I will build it” — this refers back to the ‘booth’ (sukkah).

 

Defending TROUBLING aspects of Joseph Smith's Polygamy with Brian Hales

 

Defending TROUBLING aspects of Joseph Smith's Polygamy with Brian Hales







Fray Bernardino De Sahagún (d. 1590) on the Sufferings and Pains of Purgatory

Many modern Roman Catholic apologists and theologians are embarrassed by traditional Catholic teachings concerning the pain and suffering of Purgatory; some try to present it as the love of God hugging one’s temporal punishment out of them or some other “sugary” view. Others call into question whether there is "time" in Purgatory. However, if anyone reads traditional Catholic works such as Robert Bellarmine or the descriptions of Purgatory from Catholic mystics and canonized saints, one will realize these are novel interpretations to the dogma.


While reading the Nahuatl Sermonary of Fray Bernardino De Sahagún today, I came across many descriptions of the pains and sufferings of Purgatory. Here are some examples:

 

But when some friend of our Lord Jesucristo [and] they have not done acts of meriting here on earth for the deadly sins they have confessed, it is necessary for them to suffer down there in purgatorioh. They will do acts of meriting of seven years for every single deadly sin, for such is the command established by the Justiciah of Dios. Because of all their sins perhaps it will be four hundred years! By Dios's command it is to the Santa Iglesia that indulgenciah belongs. Indulgenciah derives from the Pasion [and] suffering of our Lord. It has become the foundation of the Santa Iglesia [and] because of this one will not go down there to purgatorioh, etc.  (“Sermon in Preparation for the Passion of the Lord,” in The America’s First Sermons: The Nahuatl Sermonary of Fray Bernardino De Sahagún [trans. Ben Leeming; Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press, 2026], 283)

 

 

Perhaps you do not believe in what the sufferings of purgatorioh are like. They are very frightening; absolutely no manner of earthly suffering compares with it, it is absolutely the most painful thing! The fire down there is unlike the fire here on earth in terms of the suffering it causes people; it surpasses it utterly. Just a little time down there is considered a very long time because suffering down there in purgatorioh completely surpasses all else in how painful it is. (“Fourth Sunday after Easter,” in The America’s First Sermons: The Nahuatl Sermonary of Fray Bernardino De Sahagún [trans. Ben Leeming; Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press, 2026], 327)

 

 

There are a great many who die in mortal sin in small sins. When their animah comes out [of their body] it is brought down there to purgatorioh where it is tormented [and] suffers on account of the small sins. These ones need to be helped, so that their suffering may quickly be ended. Therefore, when the dead has been brought out to be buried, you need to count your cuentas on behalf of their animah so that our Lord will quickly have mercy on them [and] they will not tarry long down there in purgatorioh. There [at the burial] you will also take your exemplary model so that while still here on earth you will do meriting on account of our sins, for the suffering in purgatorioh is very frightening [and] the way it torments people is unlike anything here on earth. Therefore, when you hear that someone has died, you need to go there to take your exemplary model for them so that you will live well and you will live in a state of preparedness [so that] death does not come upon you when you are in [a state of] mortal sin. If you do this, our Lord Dios will have mercy on you [and] because of this you will be able to rescue yourself. May it thus be done. (“Fifteenth Sunday after Pentecost,” in The America’s First Sermons: The Nahuatl Sermonary of Fray Bernardino De Sahagún [trans. Ben Leeming; Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press, 2026], 459)

 

 

Blog Archive