Saturday, April 9, 2016

William Lane Craig on the Weak Biblical Basis for Molinism

In his book, The Only Wise God: The Compatibility of Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom (Wipf & Stock, 2000; originally Baker Book House, 1987), to support from the Bible the concept of Middle Knowledge (Molinism), William Lane Craig can only appeal to two biblical texts (1 Sam 23:6-13 and Matt 11:20-24 [pp. 131-33]). Additionally, Craig realises that the biblical basis for this view of foreknowledge is weak when he writes, "It would be difficult to prove in any direct way that he does, for the biblical passages are not unequivocal" (p. 137). On the corresponding footnote, Craig writes:

The incident in 1 Samuel 23 could be explained on the basis of God's knowledge of the present character of Saul and the man of Keilah—God could reasonably surmise what they would do if David were to remain. The passage in Matthew 11 is probably religious hyperbole meant merely to underscore the depth of the depravity of the cities in which Jesus preached.


The biblical basis for Molinism is, to put things nicely, pathetic. To read a well-reasoned examination of Molinism, see the discussion of such in William Hasker, God, Time, and Knowledge.