Saturday, March 21, 2020

Aaron Shafovaloff: Assuming Sola Scriptura and Reformed Theology



And they built the high places of Baal, which are in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire unto Molech; which I commanded them not, neither came it into my mind, that they should do this abomination, to cause Judah to sin. (Jer. 32:35 [those who watch the debate will understand why this alone refutes Aaron Shafovaloff])

Aaron Shafovaloff, in his recent debate with Kwaku El, in his opening general statement, said that a truth seeker is one who

who is seeking to appeal to his authoritative word . . (5:56 mark)

Notice here that, from the very get-go, Aaron assumes Sola Scriptura (for him, “[Jesus’] authoritative word” is exhausted by the 66 book of the Bible [the tota of scriptura]). Sady for Aaron, this is not the case. For a thorough biblical refutation thereof, see:


Aaron’s opening statement on Sola Fide is based on TULIP and imputation (as seen in his “it is as if Jesus has a temple recommend and He gives it to me” and other like-comments), as well as eisegesis of Jas 2:18 and John 5. For a thorough refutation, see:


Aaron does not like the idea of believers having to pay a penalty in an intermediate state, such as King David (cf. ). Funnily enough, this is part-and-parcel of New Testament soteriology:


This is not the first time someone from MRM has embarrassed themselves on soteriology. Bill McKeever was destroyed in a radio debate with another Latter-day Saint, James Holt:


This is not the first time Aaron has engaged in nothing but deception and eisegesis as well as embarrass himself on soteriology. For a thorough refutation of his previous debate with Kwaku (which he lost—BADLY) can be seen at: