Wednesday, April 1, 2020

The Obligation to Do Apologetics -- Daniel C Peterson

Today, I listened to the following presentation on the need to do apologetics (cf. 1 Pet 3:15; D&C 71):

The Obligation to Do Apologetics -- Daniel C Peterson

This ties well into Kwaku El's recent video:




I liked what Kwaku said--the naive view of (all too many) LDS that we should not engage in critics has been a failure and, functionally, LDS are presenting the Holy Spirit as being impotent.

In a recent anti-Mormon publication, the author (who has a strong dislike for yours truly) was forced to admit that Peterson is a knowledgable scholar and well-informed, citing the above lecture as an example of such:

One of the most interesting lectures I have ever head by a Mormon was Daniel Peterson’s 2010 lecture, “The Obligation to Do Apologetics.” Peterson is a scholar at Brigham Young University (BYU) and a well-known Mormon apologist. Although I do not agree with Peterson’s LDS beliefs, he did a marvelous job explaining why apologetics is valuable and why it is important to use reason to defend one’s beliefs. (Robert M. Bowman Jr., Jesus’ Resurrection and Joseph’s Visions: Examining the Foundations of Christianity and Mormonism [Tampa, Fla.: DeWard Publishing Company, 2020], 33)

The note for the above reads thusly:

Peterson complains about the critics of Mormonism disparaging “Mormon apologists” as though being an apologist is a bad thing. I refer to Peterson as an apologist with respect for his acknowledgement of the importance of reason and evidence, and I recognize Peter’s considerable knowledge and skills as a scholar as well as an apologist . . . (Ibid., 33 n. 9)