Thursday, August 27, 2020

Walter W. Smith (RLDS), "Book of Mormon and Zion's Religio-Literary Society" (1911) vs. the Heartland Model

 

In a work published by the Religio-Sunday School Normal Department of the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the author proposes a form of the Hemispheric model of Book of Mormon geography, though with much of the events in the book being focused in Central and South America (I hold to a Mesoamerican model, similar to the one proposed by Sorenson, Gardner, et al.). Be that as it may be, it is clearly not a “Heartland” model for Book of Mormon geography. For instance, notice the following about the “promised land” in the Book of Mormon and how only part of the USA is contained therein:

 

LESSON 14.

 

THE LAND NORTHWARD.

 

1. The land northward, otherwise the land of Mulek, (a) extended northward from the Isthmus of Panama about thirty-five hundred miles, and varied in width from fifty to more than two thousand miles, (b) including what is now Central America, Mexico, and part of the United States of America. (c) It was occupied in turn by the Jaredite and Nephite nations.

 

2. The land was known by different names at different times. We notice the following: The “promised land” (a.e., Ether 3:10, 13; s.e., Ether 3:3) . . . .  (Walter W. Smith, Book of Mormon and Zion’s Religio-Literary Society [2d ed.; Lamoni, Iowa: Herald Publishing House, 1911], 47, emphasis in bold added)

 

I am sure some triggered Heartlanders will cite this as a reason why the then-RLDS Church has basically gone to hell in a handbasket, embracing liberalism, homosexuality, etc—in other words, their apostasy in recent years has been the result of rejecting the Heartland model of the Book of Mormon(!) If you think that is far fetched and no one would make such a claim as that shows no critical thinking, look up “Hannah Stoddard” and/or “Jonathan Neville.”