Sunday, September 12, 2021

Trinitarian Apologist Takes Exception to Definition of αρχη in Scholarly Lexicon (BDAG)

In his recent book, Early Christian Creeds and Hymns, Trinitarian apologist Tony Costa took exception with a definition of “αρχη” (KJV: “beginning”) from Rev 3:14 in BDAG:

 

. . . Surprisingly, in this third edition, BDAG, 138 s.v. 3 (italics in original), states “beginning = ‘first created’ is linguistically probable.” This meaning is highly unlikely since the words “beginning,” “Ruler,” and “originator” are much more probable in light of passages which speak of the pre-existence of the Son and his role in the creation of “all things.” We see this in the Colossian hymn in 1:16-17. This would be an example of Occam’s razor, which states that the simplest and clearest explanation is to be preferred to tenuous and complicated explanations. (Tony Costa, Early Christian Creeds and Hymns—What the Earliest Christians Believed in Word and Song: An Exegetical-Theological Setting [Peterborough, Ontario: H&E Academic, 2021], 183 n. 33)

 

I bring this up as I know for a fact if a Latter-day Saint was to take exception with BDAG or some other scholarly lexicon of biblical Greek, Hebrew, or Aramaic, critics would say this is an example of the anti-intellectual and “cultic” nature of “Mormonism.” However, in reality, there is no problem disagreeing with lexicons and other scholarly sources if one can make a sound case (so as to avoid the Dunning-Kruger effect) that a scholar is wrong.