Tuesday, October 4, 2022

Very Telling Comment from "Restorations" (2022)

  

Your approach to the topic is rigorous, positivist, objective, and straightforward. Your essay is well researched, and your use of endnotes is impressive. My essay is discursive, autoethnographic, feminist, indigenous, and highly subjective. Our respective methodologies once more glaringly indicate our different religious orientations. (Gina Colvin, “Apostasy and Restoration,” in Restorations: Scholars in Dialogue from Community of Christ and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, ed. Andrew Bolton and Casey Paul Griffiths [Provo, Utah: BYU Religious Studies Center; Salt Lake City Deseret Book, 2022], 165; Colvin “currently worships locally with the Anglican Church and internationally with the Community of Christ” [ibid., 153])

 

To quote from the Colvin Translation of 1 Sam 17:45:

 

Then said Gina to the LDS scholar, Thou comes to me with facts, and with scholarship, and with research, but I come in thee in the name of muh subjective feelings.