Monday, October 23, 2023

Peter Hemingray and Peter Bilello on the Role (or lack thereof) of the Holy Spirit in Christadelphian Theology

  

The Holy Spirit in Action Today

 

In the 1970s, there was some dispute about how the Holy Spirit can be said to act in our time. Essentially, this resulted in two different views. These can be summarized as:

 

1.     The “Traditional” view was that the gift of the Holy Spirit consisted of divine supernatural help, which was given to the first century Ecclesia to assist the early brethren in the work of establishing the Truth in the earth. The Holy Spirit was withdrawn when this was accomplished and the Ecclesia established. Such gifts are not received by any today. As far as we today are concerned, we have available in the word of God the result of the Holy Spirit acting upon apostles, prophets and other inspired writers. If, of our own free will, we allow this word to influence our minds there is created in us a new mind, or spirit, which is referred to as “the Spirit of Christ” or “Spirit of God” which is recognized by works of righteousness, otherwise known as the fruits of the Spirit.

2.     An alternative, somewhat modified view of the Holy Spirit today is that the gift of the Holy Spirit is not to be identified with the miraculous powers, but is an inner power of righteousness received by all believers at baptism. It is not sufficient simply to assimilate in the mind the Word of God, and allow the Word to do its work in our lives, which alone produces righteousness by obedience to its commands. Rather, in addition to the Word, God sends His Holy Spirit into the life of the believer to strengthen him against temptation and help him to overcome his sin. This Holy Spirit or Comforter, which gives strength and courage cannot be explained, but its working can be felt within as it works the transformation of the mind. The receiving of this Holy Spirit is thus part of the process of salvation; in fact without it, salvation would appear to be impossible.

 

It must be said that the second view is not widely held. Rather the current mainstream view is as follows:

 

1.     The Bible was wholly given by inspiration of God.

2.     The only true God is everywhere present by His Spirit.

3.     The Spirit is a unity with His person in heaen.

4.     Creation was effected out of God’s own underived energy.

5.     The Son of God was begotten of the Virgin Mary by the Holy Spirit, and afterwards anointed with the same Spirit without measure at his baptism.

6.     Being so begotten of God, and inhabited and used by God through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, Jesus was Emmanuel, God with us, manifested in the flesh.

7.     The only way in which God makes known His saving revelation is in His Word, and by this alone we come to knowledge of the truth.

8.     It is this Word, mixed with faith in our hearts, which produces the growth of the mind of the Spirit within us.

9.     Chrs0tlike behavior is formed in us, as Pal expressed it, by the influence and effect of the Word of God at work in the believer’s life, through his understanding and conviction.

10.  Those who by believing and obeying the words of “the Lord the Spirit” thus enter into the fellowship of the Lord Jesus Christ are “in the Spirit” and share in the “fellowship of the Spirit”.

11.  The gifts and signs of the Spirit were evidences of the truth of the Gospel at the outset of its first declaration in the name of Jesus Christ.

12.  Comfort is to be obtained from the continuing work of the angels as “ministering spirits sent forth to minister to them who shall be heirs of salvation”.

13.  In line with the beliefs of our earlier brethren, we affirm our belief in the continuing care of God and of our Lord Jesus, without seeking to limit or even define all the ways in which the Father fulfils His promise to be ever with His people and to be their helper:

God also by the same Spirit sustains in the spiritual life those whom He has begotten unto a lively hope. We can call this by the non-scriptural phrase of “providence” if we like, and the phrase is a useful distinction between the work of the visible hand of God, capable of objective assessment, and those experiences and events which we feel, usually with hindsight, that God has overruled. But we must then ask, “Who provides? Who is at work?” and “By what means?” The answer must still be “My God shall supply all your needs according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus” (Philippians 4:19) (Alfred Nichols, The Spirit of God (CMPA: Birmingham). (Peter Hemingray and Peter Bilello, Doctrines to Be Rejected: A Study in the Second Section of the Birmingham Amended Statement of Faith [Simi Valley, Calif.: The Christadelphian Tidings Publishing Co., 2023], 83-86)

 

The Holy Spirit in our community

 

None in the Christadelphian community would claim to have the specific gifts of the Holy Spirit. None would claim that the Holy Spirit speaks to the heart and mind of the believer today, giving a genuine revelation of the will and purpose of God. And some in our community disbelieve not only all claims to possess the Spirit’s gifts, but also to be subject to the Spirit’s guidance or help. In fact, some have concluded that the only safe course is to claim the sole sufficiency of the Bible, without acknowledging any power from above which could, as they would put it, come between the believer and his unrestricted reliance on the written Word of God. These would then claim that the Holy Spirit simply does not now operate otherwise than through his Word. The believer has his Bible, and needs nothing else to enable him to secure the blessing at his Lord’s return.

 

This latter view (we might call [it] “the spirit word view”) does not seem to fully correspond to many passages in the New Testament, nor the teaching of the pioneers. In the 1970s’, there as much dispute between this view and those who held a slightly more nuanced view: this was really initiated by AD Norris, in his “The Holy Spirit and the believer today.” To quote:

 

[There would be those who, while recognizing that the Bible is the only court of appear at which doctrine, instruction, and moral precepts are to be established, hold that the Bible itself promises help from God’s Holy Spirit to the believer in living his life, meeting his temptations, and working out his salvation. These would regard the evidently miraculous gifts as past, at least for the time being, and would add that they are in any case irrelevant to salvation. But they would say that to deny God’s power and will to work in the life of every believer in every age by His Spirit could lead to the assertion that man can save himself if only e knows enough. It would lie within the believer’s power, having understood what God has revealed, to live his life in the light of that knowledge alone, and bring it to a successful issue. Such a view, they would claim, is entirely out of accord with the Bible’s won revelation o the mediation of the risen Christ and the facts of Christian worship.

 

On the other hand, the pamphlet, “The Spirit” by Aleck Crawford goes into great detail to defend the view that:

 

God’s power, however, is still active in the ministering Spirits who are sent forth to minster to those who shall be heirs of salvation. In addition, to this we, of course, have the complete revelation of God revealed by His Spirit. This is the only source of revelation today. If we read and obey this, then it will produce understanding, repentance, faith and the hope of salvation.

 

This dispute was strongest in Australia, and in 2003 the Association of Christadelphian Ecclesias there developed motion regarding the operation of the Holy Spirit. It said in part:

 

Almighty God is powerful and His Spirit or power sustains creation (Acts 17:28). We may be confident that God exercise His power in answering our prayers, or in influencing our lives, the affairs of nations or natural phenomena, but often He does so in ways that are beyond our ability to understand fully (Isa 55:8-11). We have some guidance in the Bible, but must avoid prescribing limits or defining ways in relation to the activities of God when there is no Scriptural warrant for so doing. Our limitations also mean that we cannot claim with certainty whether God has intervened miraculously in any specific event in the lives of individuals, the affairs of nations or natural phenomena, other than when Scripture explicitly says that this is so (e.g. the parting of the Red Sea; the return of the Jews to Israel).

 

The motion was carried overwhelmingly.

 

To say one “has the Spirit of God” with absolute conviction is to assert a claim beyond the bounds of information given to us. To deny its possibility also seems similarly impossible to assert. So, we must conclude with a quote from Len Richardson:

 

It is a strange anomaly to me that we have such argumentation going on in our community about it. There are brethren who believe that the Spirit of God is given to those who believe, and others who stoutly deny it and say that it ceased at the end of the first century. But one is able to observe very little difference, if any at all, between the one and the other in the lives they live and the kind of people they are. They do the same kind of things, they have the same love of the Scriptures, and the same desire to interpret the mind of Christ into their lives. I do not see outstanding differences between this man, on the one hand, who says he has got the spirit, and this man on the other hand, who says he has not. (See The Tidings, November 2017, p. 527) (Ibid., 213-15)

 

Further Reading:

 

Listing of Articles on Christadelphian Issues