An article was recently published by the Mormon Interpreter journal (I am a contributing editor) responding to Dan Vogel's (and David P. Wright's) rather lame response to the NHM inscription. If this is the best attempt by critics to offer a rebuttal to the evidence for Book of Mormon historicity from the Arabian Peninsula, they are in a lot of trouble.
Neal Rappleye and Stephen O. Smoot, “Book of
Mormon Minimalists and the NHM Inscription: A Response to Dan Vogel”
For those who want a summary of the Arabian Peninsula geography of the Book of Mormon, Jeff Lindsay has a good summary of it at his "Book of Mormon Evidences" page
