Two earlier posts (here and here) discussed the often-repeated anti-Mormon claim that LDS
theology holds that God the Father had sexual intercourse with Mary to conceive
Jesus. This is part-and-parcel of much of many (often Evangelical Protestant)
critics’ arsenal against “Mormonism,” such as the Tanners, James R. White, Ed
Decker, the late Walter Martin, and many others.
It
is true that Latter-day Saint Christology states that the Father is equally the
“source” of the humanity of Jesus as Mary was, for Jesus was truly human.
However, as Barry Bickmore and others have shown,
there is no exegetical warrant to such an argument based on yellow journalism
(subjective as it is, I have never personally encountered any Latter-day Saint
who holds to this view). Furthermore, if mortal men can impregnante someone
through non-sexual means (e.g., IVF), I am sure God the Father has the ability
to conceive Jesus miraculously, without the aid of sexual intercourse.
A
number of years ago, Wade Englund responded to an online paper by James White
of Alpha and Omega Ministries, and author of Letters to a Mormon Elder and Is the Mormon My Brother? on this issue. The paper is entitled, “Who
Physically Begat the Son?” As it is no longer available online, I have put it
here on dropbox. It does show the deficient Christology many opponents of Mormon
theology have, as the true humanity of Jesus is significantly downplayed and
even distorted. I will let the unbiased and honest reader decide for themselves
on this particular issue.
For
those wishing to see a careful analysis of the relationship between the
humanity and divinity of Jesus from a Latter-day Saint perspective, I would
recommend the final two chapters of Blake T. Ostler, Exploring Mormon Thought, volume 1: The Attributes of God (Salt Lake City: Greg Kofford Books, 2001).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.