LDS apologist, Mike Ash, has recently released his paper critiquing Jeremy Runnell's nonsense in his "CES Letter." The work, entitled, "Bamboozled by the 'CES Letter'" can be found as a .pdf here.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(290)
-
▼
September
(24)
- Joseph Smith as judge and Matthew 19:28
- Adam/Michael being differentiated from God
- Word Biblical Commentary on Psalm 82
- The Church Fathers on Baptismal Regeneration
- The importance of preparation before baptism
- Daniel Peterson and William Hamblin vs. James White
- Kevin Barney on the JST of 1 Corinthians
- Mike Ash Refutes Jeremy Runnells
- The Spirit as a Down-Payment
- Did 1 Clement teach Sola Fide?
- Baptismal Regeneration and the Epistle of Barnabas
- 1 Corinthians 7:19 and keeping the commandments
- John Tvedtnes, Elijah and the Priests of Baal
- Does 1 John 5:1 prove the ordo salutis of Calvinism?
- Baptism being salvific: The typological evidence
- Baptism, Salvation, and the New Testament, Part 5:...
- The problem posed to Sola Fide by 1 Corinthians 4:4
- Does Matthew 23:35 and Luke 24:44 support a Closed...
- Does clothing imagery support imputation?
- Does Galatians 2:20 and Colossians 2:14 support Fo...
- Does the Hebrew Bible teach Mortalism?
- θεοπνευστος and Sola Scriptura
- Keith Ward on the Trinity in the Bible
- Did Jesus offer a sacrifice for Himself?
-
▼
September
(24)