Here is a paper by a Catholic apologist, Bryan Cross, entitled, "The Church Fathers on Baptismal Regeneration." It is very thorough and is further evidence that the purely symbolic view of baptism held by many of our Evangelical critics is without any historical support and it is, in fact, a man-made tradition.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(290)
-
▼
September
(24)
- Joseph Smith as judge and Matthew 19:28
- Adam/Michael being differentiated from God
- Word Biblical Commentary on Psalm 82
- The Church Fathers on Baptismal Regeneration
- The importance of preparation before baptism
- Daniel Peterson and William Hamblin vs. James White
- Kevin Barney on the JST of 1 Corinthians
- Mike Ash Refutes Jeremy Runnells
- The Spirit as a Down-Payment
- Did 1 Clement teach Sola Fide?
- Baptismal Regeneration and the Epistle of Barnabas
- 1 Corinthians 7:19 and keeping the commandments
- John Tvedtnes, Elijah and the Priests of Baal
- Does 1 John 5:1 prove the ordo salutis of Calvinism?
- Baptism being salvific: The typological evidence
- Baptism, Salvation, and the New Testament, Part 5:...
- The problem posed to Sola Fide by 1 Corinthians 4:4
- Does Matthew 23:35 and Luke 24:44 support a Closed...
- Does clothing imagery support imputation?
- Does Galatians 2:20 and Colossians 2:14 support Fo...
- Does the Hebrew Bible teach Mortalism?
- θεοπνευστος and Sola Scriptura
- Keith Ward on the Trinity in the Bible
- Did Jesus offer a sacrifice for Himself?
-
▼
September
(24)