The following is a debate between Mark Goodacre (author of The Case Against Q [a must-read]) and Richard Carrier (author of On the Historicity of Jesus) on the question of the historicity of Jesus. Goodacre won, hands-down. As Dale Tuggy wrote on the comments section, "Goodacre creams Carrier. Not even close. This is a good illustration of a normal scholar contrasted with a crank conspiracy theorist (Carrier) who nevertheless managed to earn a PhD."
Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(290)
-
▼
October
(32)
- James White fails on Isaiah 44:24
- τελεω and τελειοω in the Johannine Corpus
- Cheryl Schatz: double standards and baldly asserti...
- Negative Questions in the Book of Mormon
- Assessing two weak arguments for Sola Scriptura
- Thoughts on M Russell Ballard and Roman Catholicism
- Carlos Bovell and the internal witness of the Spir...
- The Priesthood of All Believers
- Six Reasons Proving Cheryl Schatz Doesn't Understa...
- Martin Luther on Hebrews, James, Jude, and Revelation
- The Eucharist in the Didache
- Marion D Hanks on Gospel Scholarship
- Blake Ostler on the Christology of Mosiah 15
- M Russell Ballard on the Importance of Scholarship
- Alfred Plummer on Luke 22:44
- Appealing to the Internal Witness of the Holy Spir...
- Mosiah 2:3 and the Firstlings of the Flock
- Ephesians 2:20 and LDS Ecclesiology
- Jerry Grover, Geology of the Book of Mormon
- Another note on Matthew 28:19 and the Trinity
- 1995 Cure Debate on Sola Fide
- Did Jesus Exist? A Debate
- Joseph Smith: Boastful Prophet?
- KJV Errors in the Book of Mormon?
- Review of the Holt/McKeever Debate on LDS Soteriology
- Critique of John Calvin on 1 Timothy 3:16 and Fore...
- Is Muhammad prophesied in Song of Solomon 5:16?
- 2 Chronicles 12:7: Further Proof Prophecy is Conti...
- Egyptian Influence in Palestine around 1300 BC
- Wilfrid Harrington on Revelation 22:18
- John Calvin on John 10:30
- LDS Christology and John 10:30 and 14:10-11
-
▼
October
(32)