Friday, February 9, 2018

Listing of articles responding to "Breaking the Mormon Code"




. . . the best arguments to prove Mormonism in error are contained in this book. (Paulson, Breaking the Mormon Code, p. 6)


“Mr. Paulson has delivered a body blow that will render Mormon defenders breathless.”—James Patrick Holding, author of The Mormon Defenders: How Latter-day Saint Apologists Misinterpret the Bible (2001) and proprietor of Tektonics in his endorsement of Breaking the Mormon Code.


The following are articles interacting with some of the arguments contained in Matthew A. Paulson, Breaking the Mormon Code: A Critique of Mormon Scholarship Regarding Classical Christian Theology and the Book of Mormon (Livermore, Calif.: WingSpan, 2006, 2009). It will be updated as I post more articles responding to the volume (note: some of the early articles are responses to the 2006 printing of his book; in the 2009 printing, at times, the page numbers are off by 1):

KJV Errors in the Book of Mormon? (a response to an old online article by Paulson)

Constantine was Unregenerate according to Some Evangelical Apologists

LDS Appeals to J.R. Dummelow and the Trinity

Matthew Paulson Fails to Prove Sola Scriptura

False Prophecy in 1 Nephi 13:20?

Responding to "Is the Book of Mormon Perfect or Corrupted?"

Assurance, Authenticity, Errors, and the Book of Mormon

Isaiah 52:13-53:12, Mosiah 14, and KJV Chapter and Verse Separations in the Book of Mormon

Chiasmus in the Book of Mormon

The sloppiness of some anti-Mormon Authors

The Second Lord of Psalm 110:1

The charge that LDS and non-LDS Scholars Abuse Eusebius

Responding to Misinformed Comments on LDS Pneumatology

No, 1 Clement does not teach Sola Fide

Responding to critics of Latter-day Saint theology about the meaning of κηρύσσω in 1 Peter 3:19

Does the fact that Some Early Christians Affirmed Baptism of Blood (and Desire) Mean they Did not Believe Water Baptism was Essential?




















at