. . . John says that the word was God. This is a difficult saying
for us to understand, and it is difficult because Greek, in which John wrote,
had a different way of saying things from the way in which English speaks. When
Greek uses a noun it almost always uses the definite article with it. The Greek
for God is theos and the definite
article is ho. When Greek speaks about
God it does not simply say theos; it
says ho theos. Now when Greek does
not use the definite article with a noun that noun becomes much more like an
adjective. John did not say that the word was ho theos; that would have been to say that the word was identical with God. He said that the
word was theos—without the definite
article—which means that the word was, we might say, of the very same character
and quality and essence and being as God. When John said the word was God he was not saying that Jesus was identical with
God; he was saying that Jesus was so perfectly the same as God in mind, in
heart, in being that in him we perfectly see what God is like. (William
Barclay, The Gospel of John, volume 1:
Chapters 1-7 [rev ed.; The Daily Study Bible; Edinburgh: The Saint Andrew Press,
1975], 39)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2019
(877)
-
▼
May
(47)
- Sharon H. Ringe on The Woman At Bethany and the An...
- William Barclay on John 1:1c
- William Barclay on the Institution of the Eucharis...
- Wendy Ulrich on Christ as Deacon
- Excerpts from Mark D. Ellison, “Family, Marriage, ...
- Eric Huntsman on the Absence of Gethsemane in the ...
- Andrew Skinner on JST Matthew 4:1
- Avram Shannon on the Problematic Use of Rabbinic S...
- Jonathan Neville criticizes Book of Mormon Central...
- Early Latter-day Saints, Temple Theology, and Reve...
- E.W. Hengstenberg's Use of Elijah/Elias in Malachi...
- E.W. Hengstenberg on the Song of Solomon
- David L. Allen on Romans 8:32-34, Christ as a "Pro...
- Another Example of a Defender of Forensic Justific...
- S.J. Samartha on Paul's Subordinationist Christology
- Robert Smith on Feelings versus facts
- Alvin Dyer on the Great and Limitless Potential of...
- Alvin Dyer, "Foreknowledge with Covenants and Seal...
- Alvin Dyer on Satan's Rebellion and Fall
- David Kemball-Cook on the Trinity and the Prayers ...
- Marinus De Jonge on “High Christology” being Early
- The Authenticity and Antiquity of John 21
- Stephen Smalley on the Gospel of John and Evidence...
- D. Charles Pyle on Revelation 3:14
- Trent Horn vs. the "Mythical Messiah" and Ancient ...
- Paul D. Miller on the Abuse of God being "Sovereig...
- “Jesus Said Nothing about Homosexuality” answered ...
- Tremper Longman III on Genesis 1 and Creation from...
- Duane Crowther on Biblical Scholarship being an Im...
- Duane Crowther on Isaiah 2:2 being about a future ...
- John A. Widtsoe on the Salvific Efficacy of Water ...
- Exams Begin Tomorrow//How to Support this Blog
- John H. Walton and J. Harvey Walton on Exodus 20:3...
- Frederick J. Pack on Science and Religion
- Joseph F. Smith's Rejection of an "Either-or" Appr...
- God the Father in LDS Theology: "Just Like" Ancien...
- Couples Married Civilly Now Authorized for Immedia...
- Jesus' use of Exodus 3:6 vs. Formal Sufficiency of...
- Elder Kevin W. Pearson, A Sacred and Imperative Duty
- Bruce E. Dale and Brian Dale, Joseph Smith: The Wo...
- Eisegeting James: Why the Book of James Doesn't Su...
- Brian J. Tabb on the Efficacy of the Prayers of th...
- Albert Vanhoye and Peter S. Williams, "Is Everyone...
- Albert Vanhoye and Peter S. Williams on Paul's The...
- Dale Allison on the Contingent Nature of Eschatolo...
- David Yarn on the Gospel of John and the "High Chr...
- David Yarn on the Meaning of "Elohim"
-
▼
May
(47)