Tuesday, May 10, 2022

Does Matthew 22:7 Necessitate a Post-70 Authorship for the Gospel of Matthew?

 

Matthew 22:7 contains imagery found elsewhere in the ancient Near East and indeed in the Jewish Scriptures (cf. Josh. 6:21-24; Judg. 1:8; 18:27; 20:48; and 1 Macc. 5:28, 35). It particularly resonates with Judah 1:7-15, which reports that Nebuchadnezzar waged destructive war against nations that refused to heed his messengers’ call to join him, as well as 2 Chronicles 36:15-19, which depicts the destruction of the first temple as a consequence of Israel’s failure to accept God’s prophets. Such material suffices to demonstrates that a scenario much like that found in Matthew 22;1-7 was intelligible prior to 70.

 

The above considerations do not prove fatal to the hypothesis that Matthew 22:7 refers to the destruction of the temple after the fact, but neither are they particularly friendly to that hypothesis. They do create a scenario in which Matthew 22:7 is at least as intelligible before 70 as after. The passage is best considered to be nonprobative for establish the date of Matthew’s Gospel. (Jonathan Bernier, Rethinking the Dates of the New Testament: The Evidence for Early Composition [Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2022], 41-42)

  

Blog Archive