Tuesday, January 7, 2025

Walther Zimmerli on Ezekiel 13:17-23

  

13:17–23* The two-part oracle against the prophets is followed by a two-part saying against the women who prophesy, introduced with a renewed address to the prophet, a fresh commission, which is expanded here by the command to perform an expressive gesture, and a renewed messenger formula.28 Whereas the two-part oracle against the prophets has been strongly influenced by the older prophetic preaching in its content and even to the text of certain formulations, here the striking thing is the novelty of the content and the formulations. Not that the Old Testament does not otherwise know of women who prophesy. In Ex 15:20* Miriam, who sings with the daughters of Israel the saving action of Yahweh toward Israel, receives (as a singer?) the title of נביאה. Deborah, who “judged” Israel and became through her song (Ju 5:12*) the source of the summons of the tribes against Canaanite oppression, is described in Ju 4:4* as אשׁה נביאה . Whilst with Isaiah’s wife we do not know for what action she is described in Is 8:3* by the title נביאה (scarcely simply because she was the wife of a prophet, and we could better think of service as a temple singer), Huldah, the wife of a temple official (2 Kings 22:14*; 2 Chr 34:22*), appears as a נביאה in connection with the delivery of a divine decision of very great importance for the Judean state. Further Noadiah (הנביאה), exactly like the “remnant of the prophets” (Neh 6:14*), appears to have been concerned with instructions to the political governor.

 

Nothing of all this can be found in the description given by Ezekiel. Rather there is noteworthy here not only the (intentional?) avoidance of the title נביאה and its replacing by the looser בנות עמך המתנבאות, in the hitpo‛el of which Cooke would find a slight note of contempt (“who behave like prophets”), but also the concentration on private concerns in the actions of the women attacked here. Of the great question about the “house of Israel” (v 4*) struggling for its existence, which can be seen in the images of the breaches in the wall and its endangering, nothing is to be seen here. It is concerned solely with the deliverance (or endangering) of individuals (נפשׁות vv 18–20*), about the fate of the righteous and the wicked (-רשׁע–צדיק v 22*)—things which the exiled prophet knew in glancing at his immediate surroundings in a particular way as his responsibility. Not by chance do we find in this oracle formulations which recall by way of contrast the assertions about the prophet’s role as watchman (3:17–21*; 33:1–9*) and the explanations of Ezek 18.

 

The twofold oracle of vv 17ff* undeniably enters into a sphere of minor mantic acts and magic—a sphere which can only be put quite improperly under the catchword “prophetic.” Dtn 18:9ff* sets this mantic activity in opposition to the “prophets” (נביא) given to Israel, as a Canaanite counterpart, even in its terminology. When we examine the perspective which enables Ezekiel to set these lesser activities under the catchword “prophetic,” then it is clearly the case that here also powers were employed which mediated “life” and “death.” Just as the word of the prophet legitimately gives death (11:13*) and life (37:4ff*), so, in the activity of these women of Israel (המתנבאות מלבהן v 17*), death and life were dispensed in an unauthorized manner, and so Yahweh’s dominion was infringed upon. (Walther Zimmerli, Ezekiel: A Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Ezekiel, 2 vols. [Hermeneia—a critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible; Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1979], 1:296-97)

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

Blog Archive