Saturday, January 15, 2022

Chris Keith on Less-Obvious Examples of Inconsistencies between the Gospels of Mark and John

Chris Keith, in his discussion of purported inconsistencies between the Gospels of Mark and John, noted the following alongside the “standard fare” (e.g., different days for the crucifixion):

 

There are also less-obvious examples that do not always get as much attention but are perhaps even more interesting. For example, whereas the Markan narrator states that Jesus prayed that ‘the hour (η ωρα) might pass from him’ (Mk 14.35), the Johannine Jesus scoffs at even the idea of responding to ‘the hour’ in this manner: ‘Now my soul is troubled. And what should I say? ‘Father, save me from this hour (της ωραν ταυτης)’? But for this I have come for this hour (την ωραν ταυτην)’ (Jn 12.27). Likewise, whereas Mark claims that Simon of Cyrene carried Jesus’ cross of him (Mk. 15.21), John specifies that Jesus carried his cross himself (Jn 19.17).

 

To these we can add several more possible disagreements with other Synoptic Gospels. In contrast to the Matthean and Lukan infancy narratives, wherein Jesus is born of a virgin in Bethlehem (Mt. 1.18-2.1; Lk. 1.26-2.40), the Johannine Jesus receives no narrated birth, virgin or otherwise, and is never in Bethlehem (cf. Jn 7.42). IN the account of the miraculous haul of fish, Luke 5.6 claims that there were so many fish that ‘their nets were being torn (διερρησσετο . . . τα δικτυα αυτων) whereas John 21.11 states that, despite there being exactly 153 fish, ‘the net was not ripped’ (ουκ εσχισθη το δικτυον). (Chris Keith “’If John Knew Mark’: Critical Inheritance and Johannine Disagreements with Mark,” in Eve-Marie Becker, Helen K. Bond, and Catrin H. Williams, eds., John’s Transformation of Mark [London: T&T Clark, 2021], 33)