Wednesday, October 25, 2023

Excerpts from Stephen L. Richards, “Being Orthodox in Religion" (1943)

When reading the following excerpts from “Being Orthodox in Religion,” I was reminded of some of the more vocal critics within the Church one often encounters, including one atheist who, until recently, larped as a Latter-day Saint as his pay cheque depended on it:

 

Now what is necessary to be orthodox, or “correct and sound in the doctrine” of Christianity? To what must we subscribe? In answer to this question, I might, with propriety, quote the long list of Christian principles which are considered fundamental in the Christian doctrine. But I am not going to do this. I am going to try to simply and condense this answer. The answer I propose is this: Accept Christ for what He said he was. If we can really do this, we will be orthodox.

 

I have never been able to understand how intelligent, educated men could reconcile and the acceptance of that portion of the record of the Savior which sets forth His incomparable teachings and philosophy, and at the same time deny the correctness of the same record which proclaims His divine Sonship and Lordship and miraculous powers. What justification is there for credence in a part of the record and not all of it, or for believing some of the things that Master said and not all that He said? I admit that it may be easier, in that it requires less faith to accept some parts, rather than other parts, but from the standpoint of the authenticity and validity of the record itself, which is admittedly the source from which we obtain our knowledge and information of the Christ, how can one part be true without all being true? To that question I have never been able to discover a satisfactory answer. (Stephen L. Richards, “Being Orthodox in Religion,” in The Church in War and Peace [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, 1943], 52)

 

Now I do not contend that the authorities and policies of the Church are beyond criticism. If the criticism were constructive and if it could reach those who could remedy defects when they are shown, it might be very profitable. I know, without being told, that the men who administer the affairs of the Church are men with human frailties, but I know, too, that they are humble men and that they diligently and prayerfully seek to give to the service of their fellows the best that is within them. There may be a few exceptions, but they are very rare indeed. With such a disposition manifest in Church leaders and officers, surely it is not going too far to ask for forbearance of judgment and kindly, tolerant consideration, and particularly a full investigation of all the facts before adverse criticism is either entertained or uttered. I believe that if we could once and for all abandon the practice of long-range, ill-considered, intemperate criticism, thousands of people would save themselves and their faith. It is my desire not so much to save the Church from criticism as to save the critics from themselves. (Stephen L. Richards, “Being Orthodox in Religion,” in The Church in War and Peace [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, 1943], 55-56)