Tuesday, December 5, 2023

Giovanni Papini on Lactantius' Belief that Satan is the Brother of Jesus

  

The Devil, Brother of the Word?

 

The Moorish writer Lucius Caecilius Firmianus, best known under his nickname of Lactantius, who lived in the second half of the third and early part of the fourth-centuries, has no great authority as theologian, but in his Patrologia, TixĂ©ront says of him: “his was a calm, considered peace-loving nature, he was a sincere Christian who unobtrusively did his duty.”

 

In his big apologetic work we find a truly astounding statement, (Divinae Institutiones, II, 9), the origin of which we are not very sure of. According to Lactantius, Lucifer would have been nothing less than the brother of the Logos, of the Word, i.e., of the Second Person of the Trinity. Here is his amazing statement:

 

“Begore creating the world, God produced a spirit like Himself, replete with the virtues of the Father. Later he made another, in whom the mark of divine origin was erased, because this one was besmirched by the poison of jealousy and turned therefore from good to evil. . . . He was jealous of his older Brother who, remaining united with the Father, insured his affection unto Himself. This being who from good became bad is called Devil by the Greeks.”

 

The first born spirit, filled with every divine virtue and beloved by God above all other spirits, can easily be recognized as the Word, that is, the Son. But Lactantius’ story leads one to think that the other Spirit, also endowed with every grace, was the second son of the Father: the future Satan would be, no less, the younger brother of the future Christ. And Satna would not have become jealous of men, as St. Cyprian, St. Irenaeus and St. Gregory of Nyssa argued, but jealous of his own brother. Cain’s jealousy of Abel would have been prefigured in heaven at the beginning of time, in Lucifer’s jealousy of the Logos.

 

Lactantius’ extraordinary opinion has not, to my knowledge, been accepted and restated by any Christian theologian. Perhaps, in his thinking, it sprang from the exaggeration of a doctrine, then and later quite widely diffused, according to which Lucifer was the most luminous and perfect of the angels, therefore the nearest to God and, perhaps, the first to have been created. But the highest of the angels is still very far, both in nature and essence, from the one and triune God.

 

It is curious that a sincere and learned Christian could teach, in the fourth century, that Satan was not only the first of the Archangels but actually the brother of God. (Giovanni Papini, The Devil: Notes for a Future Diabology [trans. Adrienne Foulke; London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1955], 61-62)