Saturday, December 9, 2023

Michael Hundley on the burning firepot and torch in Genesis 15

  

The Burning Firepot and Torch

 

Genesis 15 is the clearest example of Yahweh manifesting as an object. After Abram asks for reassurance that he will possess the land, Yahweh requests a heifer, goat, ram, turtledove, and pigeon, which Abram proceeds to cut in two (15:7-11). After Abram falls into a deep sleep, accompanied by a deep and terrifying darkness, Yahweh makes an oath related to land possession and a smoking firepot and burning torch (tannûr ‘āšān wəlappî ‘ēš) and pass between the carcasses (12-20).

 

The seemingly bizarre episode resembles other Neo-Assyrian imprecation ceremonies. For example, the Aramaic text of a treaty reads, “(Just as this) calf is cut in two, thus may Matiel be cut, and may his nobles be cut” (Sefire 1A:39-40). In the treaty, “violence done to the animal foreshadows violence done to treaty violators.” Genesis 15 seems to carry a similar meaning (cf. Jer. 34:18-20).

 

What then are the firepot and torch meant to represent? Although unclear, they seem to represent cult objects. In this case they are likely stand-ins for Yahweh himself, rendered appropriate by the dream setting. (The wording of 15:17 leaves open the possibility that the pot and torch may appear in the waking worlds, not just the dream, especially since the carcasses exist in the waking world. In either case, it seems to be a liminal experience) The objects are symbols for presence, likely not manifestations. (Admittedly, the difference here is minimal) Having Yahweh himself walk through the carcasses or carry the objects through them may be a bit too morbid, or it may suggest a vulnerability the storyteller wants to avoid. By contrast, using symbolic language surrogates simultaneously binds Yahweh to fulfill his promises on penalty of death while distancing him from the scene by inserting objects as proxies. (Michael Hundley, Yahweh Among the Gods: The Divine in Genesis, Exodus, and the Ancient Near East [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022], 334-35)

 

Blog Archive