Friday, May 31, 2024

The Interpretation of 1 Corinthians 2:14 by Irenaeus of Lyons

  

3. And they teach that He pointed out the three kinds of men as follows: the material, when He said to him that asked Him, "Shall I follow Thee?" "The Son of man hath not where to lay His head;"-- the animal, when He said to him that declared, "I will follow Thee, but suffer me first to bid them farewell that are in my house," "No man, putting his hand to the plough, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of heaven" (for this man they declare to be of the intermediate class, even as they do that other who, though he professed to have wrought a large amount of righteousness, yet refused to follow Him, and was so overcome by [the love of] riches, as never to reach perfection)--this one it pleases them to place in the animal class;--the spiritual, again, when He said, "Let the dead bury their dead, but go thou and preach the kingdom of God," and when He said to Zaccheus the publican, "Make haste, and come down, for to-day I must abide in thine house"--for these they declared to have belonged to the spiritual class. Also the parable of the leaven which the woman is described as having hid in three measures of meal, they declare to make manifest the three classes. For, according to their teaching, the woman represented Sophia; the three measures of meal, the three kinds of men-- spiritual, animal, and material; while the leaven denoted the Saviour Himself. Paul, too, very plainly set forth the material, animal, and spiritual, saying in one place, "As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy;" and in another place, "But the animal man receiveth not the things of the Spirit;" and again: "He that is spiritual judgeth all things." And this, "The animal man receiveth not the things of the Spirit," they affirm to have been spoken concerning the Demiurge, who, as being animal, knew neither his mother who was spiritual, nor her seed, nor the AEons in the Pleroma. And that the Saviour received first-fruits of those whom He was to save, Paul declared when he said, "And if the first-fruits be holy, the lump is also holy,"15 teaching that the expression "first-fruits" denoted that which is spiritual, but that "the lump" meant us, that is, the animal Church, the lump of which they say He assumed, and blended it with Himself, inasmuch as He is "the leaven." (Irenaeus, Against Heresies, 1.8.3 [ANF 1:327])

 

1. But we do now receive a certain portion of His Spirit, tending towards perfection, and preparing us for incorruption, being little by little accustomed to receive and bear God; which also the apostle terms "an earnest," that is, a part of the honour which has been promised us by God, where he says in the Epistle to the Ephesians, "In which ye also, having heard the word of truth, the Gospel of your salvation, believing in which we have been sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, which is the earnest of our inheritance." This earnest, therefore, thus dwelling in us, renders us spiritual even now, and the mortal is swallowed up by immortality. "For ye," he declares, "are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you." This, however does not take place by a casting away of the flesh, but by the impartation of the Spirit. For those to whom he was writing were not without flesh, but they were those who had received the Spirit of God, "by which we cry, Abba, Father." If therefore, at the present time, having the earnest, we do cry, "Abba, Father," what shall it be when, on rising again, we behold Him face to face; when all the members shall burst out into a continuous hymn of triumph, glorifying Him who raised them from the dead, and gave the gift of eternal life? For if the earnest, gathering man into itself, does even now cause him to cry, "Abba, Father," what shall the complete grace of the Spirit effect, which shall be given to men by God? It will render us like unto Him, and accomplish the will of the Father; for it shall make man after the image and likeness of God.

 

2. Those persons, then, who possess the earnest of the Spirit, and who are not enslaved by the lusts of the flesh, but are subject to the Spirit, and who in all things walk according to the light of reason, does the apostle properly term "spiritual," because the Spirit of God dwells in them. Now, spiritual men shall not be incorporeal spirits; but our substance, that is, the union of flesh and spirit, receiving the Spirit of God, makes up the spiritual man. But those who do indeed reject the Spirit's counsel, and are the slaves of fleshly lusts, and lead lives contrary to reason, and who, without restraint, plunge headlong into their own desires, having no longing after the Divine Spirit, do live after the manner of swine and of dogs; these men, [I say], does the apostle very properly term "carnal," because they have no thought of anything else except carnal things.

 

3. For the same reason, too, do the prophets compare them to irrational animals, on account of the irrationality of their conduct, saying, "They have become as horses raging for the females; each one of them neighing after his neighbour's wife." And again, "Man, when he was in honour, was made like unto cattle." This denotes that, for his own fault, he is likened to cattle, by rivalling their irrational life. And we also, as the custom is, do designate men of this stamp as cattle and irrational beasts.

 

4. Now the law has figuratively predicted all these, delineating man by the [various] animals: whatsoever of these, says [the Scripture], have a double hoof and ruminate, it proclaims as clean; but whatsoever of them do not possess one or other of these [properties], it sets aside by themselves as unclean. Who then are the clean? Those who make their way by faith steadily towards the Father and the Son; for this is denoted by the steadiness of those which divide the hoof; and they meditate day and night upon the words of God, that they may be adorned with good works: for this is the meaning of the ruminants. The unclean, however, are those which do neither divide the hoof nor ruminate; that is, those persons who have neither faith in God, nor do meditate on His words: and such is the abomination of the Gentiles. But as to those animals which do indeed chew the cud, but have not the double hoof, and are themselves unclean, we have in them a figurative description of the Jews, who certainly have the words of God in their mouth, but who do not fix their rooted stedfastness in the Father and in the Son; wherefore they are an unstable generation. For those animals which have the hoof all in one piece easily slip; but those which have it divided are more sure-footed, their cleft hoofs succeeding each other as they advance, and the one hoof supporting the other. In like manner, too, those are unclean which have the double hoof but do not ruminate: this is plainly an indication of all heretics, and of those who do not meditate on the words of God, neither are adorned with works of righteousness; to whom also the Lord says, "Why call ye Me Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say to you?" For men of this stamp do indeed say that they believe in the Father and the Son, but they never meditate as they should upon the things of God, neither are they adorned with works of righteousness; but, as I have already observed, they have adopted the lives of swine and of dogs, giving themselves over to filthiness, to gluttony, and recklessness of all sorts. Justly, therefore, did the apostle call all such "carnal" and "animal," --[all those, namely], who through their own unbelief and luxury do not receive the Divine Spirit, and in their various phases cast out from themselves the life-giving Word, and walk stupidly after their own lusts: the prophets, too, spake of them as beasts of burden and wild beasts; custom likewise has viewed them in the light of cattle and irrational creatures; and the law has pronounced them unclean. (Irenaeus, Against Heresies 5.8.1-4 [ANF 1:533-54])

 

True knowledge, then, consists in the understanding of Christ, which Paul terms the wisdom of God hidden in a mystery, which "the natural man receiveth not," the doctrine of the cross; of which if any man "taste," he will not accede to the disputations and quibbles of proud and puffed-up men, who go into matters of which they have no perception. For the truth is unsophisticated (ἀσχημάτιστος); and "the word is nigh thee, in thy mouth and in thy heart," as the same apostle declares, being easy of comprehension to those who are obedient. For it renders us like to Christ, if we experience "the power of his resurrection and the fellowship of His sufferings.” For this is the affinity of the apostolical teaching and the most holy "faith delivered unto us," which the unlearned receive, and those of slender knowledge have taught, not "giving heed to endless genealogies," but studying rather [to observe] a straightforward course of life; lest, having been deprived of the Divine Spirit, they fail to attain to the kingdom of heaven. For truly the first thing is to deny one's self and to follow Christ; and those who do this are borne onward to perfection, having fulfilled all their Teacher's will, becoming sons of God by spiritual regeneration, and heirs of the kingdom of heaven; those who seek which first shall not be forsaken. (Irenaeus, Fragments, XXXV [ANF 1:574])

 

 

Thursday, May 30, 2024

MIchael R. Licona on θεοπνευστος

  

The term may have been in use prior to the composition of 2 Timothy. Theopneustos appears twice in the Sibylline Oracles, “a complex and unsystematic compilation of reconstructed or fabricated prophecies ascribed to Sibyls but largely representing the ingenuity of Jewish and Christian compilers.” There are two collections of the oracles, one dating to the end of the fifth century AD and the other to the end of the seventh century. However, some of the oracles are earlier than the collections in which they appear, though how much earlier is difficult to determine. Some could have been composed as early as 150 CE, thereby predating 2 Timothy. In one of the oracles, the foolish city of Cyme is said to have “theopneustic streams” (Sibyl. 5:308). In the other, we read of the “great God better of all things theopneustic” (Sibyl. 5:406). Theopneustos also appears in the Testament of Abraham, a pseudepigraphical writing, perhaps composed sometime between AD 75-125. In the Testament of Abraham20:11, the archangel Michael and a multitude of angels place “theopneustic ointments and perfumes” on Abraham’s corpse until the third day after his death.

 

Sometime between the first century BC and the second century AD, someone composed a poem in the name of the poet Phoclides, who had lived in the sixth century BC. The poem is known as Sentences by Pseudo-Phoclides. Theopneustos appears in verse 129 and reads, “But the speech of theopneustic wisdom is best.” (Poirier, trans. The Invention of the Inspired Text, 60) However, most scholars think verse 129 was added to the text later, perhaps even later than Origen. (Poirier, The Invention of the Inspired Text, 58)

 

Theopneustos also appears in the Anthologies, a nine-book treatise on astrology written by Vettius Valens and composed sometime between AD 152-162. (Anthony Spawforth, “Vettius Valens,” in Oxford Cultural Dictionary, 1547) Vettius writes that the aether (believed then to be an all-encompassing substance, which includes the air) exists in us and is a “theopneustic product.” (Vettius Valens, Astrol. 9.1.37 [frag. 1764.006]) In the late second century, Clement of Alexandria uses the term on three occasions in Stromateis (Miscellanies) and once in Protrepticus (Exhortation to the Greeks), each to describe Scripture. (Stromata 1.21.124; 7.16.101, 103; Protr. 9.86.2-87.2) The Lives of Carpus, Papylus, and Agathonice, 12.33-36 (circa AD 2-3 century) provides two occurrences of theopneustos. The first refers to the Scriptures as theopneustos. In the second, Carpus, who is a Christian, says to the Roman governor who will execute him, “What do you want, Proconsul? To resist the truth and suppose that you will prevail in spite of it? But if you want to give close attention to the theopneustic lessons of the church, you will become an heir of eternal truth.” (Vitae Carpi, Papyli et Agathonicae, Martyrium sanctorum Carpi, Papyli et Agathonicae [BJG 294]) In other words, the teachings of the Church are theopneustos.

 

. . .

 

What have we learned in the process? The Scriptures are regarded as being theopneustos, as are the teachings of the which, which are based on the Scriptures. Other objects, such as certain streams, ointments, and aether can be theopneustos. The ability to interpret dreams as theopneustos. Perhaps the closest way of describing the meaning of theopneustos is to say te thing it describes derives from God or that God is its ultimate and special origin. (Michael R. Licona, Jesus, Contradicted: Why the Gospels Tell the Same Story Differently [Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan Academic, 2024], 181-82), 183

 

Bartolomé de las Casas Engaging in a Form of Loan Shifting and "Javelins"

 October 12, 1492

 

Bartolomé de las Casas recounting Columbus telling the Spanish Crown his belief in converting the Indians through love instead of sheer force:

 

14. They have no iron; their javelins are a kind of staff without an iron point, but some of them have a fish's tooth on the end, and others, other things.

 

A Synoptic Log of Columbus's First Voyage, ed. and trans. Francesca Lardicci, Valeria Bertolucci Pizzorusso, Cynthia L. Chamberlain, and Blair Sullivan (Turnhout: Brepols, 1999), 48

 

 

 

c. October 12, 1492:

 

*f.[FH,14.] The natives had no weapons, except that there were some javelins, which are staffs with the points fired and sharpened, or some of them with a fish's tooth or bone on the end, which they used for fishing rather than killing any person, . . .

 

A Synoptic Log of Columbus's First Voyage, ed. and trans. Francesca Lardicci, Valeria Bertolucci Pizzorusso, Cynthia L. Chamberlain, and Blair Sullivan (Turnhout: Brepols, 1999), 197

Joel Korytko, "Why Ephesians 1 Doesn't Support Calvinism"

 

Why Ephesians 1 Doesn't Support Calvinism








Walter Grundmann on the Johannine use of μεγας

  

4.         The Johannine Use.

 

Jesus tells Nathanael, who saw that he was known by Him: μείζω τούτων ὄψῃ (Jn. 1:50). This promise is elucidated by the general promise: ὄψεσθε τὸν οὐρανὸν ἀνεῳγότα … The reference is to seeing the δόξα of Jesus, in which they will share when they are drawn into it. This takes place because through and in Jesus they see God and are set in fellowship with Him. Jesus expects for Himself: πατὴρ φιλεῖ τὸν υἱὸν καὶ πάντα δείκνυσιν αὐτῷ αὐτὸς ποιεῖ, καὶ μείζονα τούτων δείξει αὐτῷ ἔργα, ἵνα ὑμεῖς θαυμάζητε, 5:20. He does not do His miracles of Himself. He fulfils what the Father, with whom He is one in love, manifests to Him. He will show Him greater works than the miracle wrought at the pool of Bethesda on the man who had been lame for 38 years. What this greater thing is may be seen in the following verse. It is a matter of ζωοποιεῖν. This is the greater thing compared with the miracles which He performs. To the disciple who abides in faith in Christ the promise is made: ηείζονα τούτων ποιήσει, and the basis of this is His going to the Father (14:12). This going to the Father gives Him the possibility of greater efficacy exercised through the disciples.

 

The promise of the greater thing, and the power to do it, make Jesus greater than the fathers. The Samaritan woman senses this from His saying: μὴ σὺ μείζων εἶ τοῦ πατρὸς ἡμῶν Ἰακώβ; (4:12). The Jews ask the same question: μὴ σὺ μείζων εἶ τοῦ πατρὸς ἡμῶν Ἀβραάμ; (8:53). He Himself confesses: ἐγὼ δὲ ἔχω τὴν μαρτυρίαν μείζω τοῦ Ἰωάννου (5:36). The question is whether this is a witness greater than John had or than John gave. In view of v. 33 the latter is more probable. Jesus lays before those who would judge Him two witnesses: the works which the Father gives Him, and Scripture, in which the Father has testified to Him. The witness of John is mentioned only for the sake of His hearers. He does not emphasise it, for He will not accept the witness of men. It is said of the witness of God as compared with the witness of men: μαρτυρία τοῦ θεοῦ μείζων ἐστίν (1 Jn. 5:9).

 

A special question is raised by the textually uncertain saying in 10:29: either πατήρ μου ὃς δέδωκέν μοι πάντων μείζων ἐστίν (א LD syrsin pesh Basil Chrysost Cyril Alex), or: πατήρ μου δέδωκέν μοι πάντων μεῖζόν ἐστιν (AB Tert Aug latt). In the first case Jesus grounds His authority to grant eternal and inalienable life in the greatness of the Father, which is above all things, so that nothing can pluck those who belong to Jesus out of the hand of the Father. In the second case the power of Jesus as a shepherd is described as the highest and supreme thing. Whereas in the first case the greatness of Jesus is grounded in the Father, in the second it is said of this greatness which the Father has given Him that it cannot be challenged by anything. Though Jesus speaks of His unity with the Father, and this is the foundation of Johannine Christology, He does not equate Himself with the Father. This is plain in the saying: πατὴρ μείζων μού ἐστιν (14:28). The First Epistle declares: μείζων ἐστὶν θεὸς τῆς καρδίας ἡμῶν, namely, as He who pardons, who overcomes the accusing heart (3:20). For this reason it can say: ὑμεῖς ἐκ τοῦ θεοῦ ἐστε, τεκνία, καὶ νενικήκατε αὐτούς (namely, the ψευδοπροφῆται), ὅτι μείζων ἐστὶν ἐν ὑμῖν ἐν τῷ κόσμῳ (4:4). God, who is in the community, is greater than Satan, who is in the world.

 

The Johannine Christ forbids the disciples to exalt themselves above Him. He also commands them to love and serve as He does: οὐκ ἔστιν δοῦλος μείζων τοῦ κυρίου αὐτοῦ, οὐδὲ ἀπόστολος μείζων τοῦ μέμψαντος αὐτόν, (Jn. 13:16). In so doing they will experience the hatred of the world like Himself: μνημονεύετε τοῦ λόγου οὗ ἐγὼ εἶπον ὑμῖν· οὐκ ἔστιν δοῦλος μείζων τοῦ κυρίου αὐτοῦ· εἰ ἐμὲ ἐδίωξαν, καὶ ὑμᾶς διώξουσιν. But also: εἰ τὸν λόγον μου ἐτήρησαν, καὶ τὸν ὑμέτερον τηρήσουσιν (Jn. 15:20).

 

In 1 Jn. 3:19 f. we have the saying: “Herein—namely, in love in deed and in truth—we shall know that we are of the truth, and shall assure our heart before him. For if our heart condemns us, God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all things.” The greatness of God, which is above both accusation and Satan, to whom all accusations go back (cf. 1 Jn. 4:4), consists in the forgiveness which remits guilt and in the power which gives fulfilment of the commandments. (Walter Grundmann, “Μέγας, Μεγαλεῖον, Μεγαλειότης, Μεγαλοπρεπής, Μεγαλύνω, Μεγαλωσύνη, Μέγεθος,” Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, ed. Gerhard Kittel, Geoffrey W. Bromiley, and Gerhard Friedrich, 10 vols. [Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1964–], 4:536–538)

 

Renald E. Showers on the Pre-Millennial View of Early Christians

  

The Millennial View of Early Church Leaders

 

Papias

 

Papias lived from approximately 60 to 130 A.D. It is believed that he was taught directly by the Apostle John. He was a friend of Polycarp, another prominent Church leader who was a disciple of John. Papias served as Bishop of Hierapolis in Phrygia, Asia Minor. His writings have not been preserved to the present day; however, Irenaeus and Eusebius, two other Church leaders, referred to his writings.

 

Irenaeus, after relating Christ’s teaching concerning the dramatic changes which the earth will experience in the future Millennium, wrote, “And these things are borne witness to in writing by Papias, the hearer of John, and a companion of Polycarp, in his fourth book.

 

Eusebius, Bishop of Caesarea and the “Father of Church history,” wrote concerning Papias in his work Ecclesiastical History (III, 39), “Among other things he says that a thousand years will elapse after the resurrection of the dead and there will be a corporal establishment of Christ’s Kingdom on this earth.”

 

The Epistle of Barnabas

 

Scholars have concluded that this piece of early Christian literature was written between 120 and 150 A.D. by a Christian in Alexandria, Egypt, not by the Barnabas of the New Testament.

 

This epistle presented a view which appears to have been rather popular among ancient Jews and Christians. It declared that just as God labored for six days in creation, so the present earth will labor in its turmoil for 6,000 years. Then it asserted that just as God rested on the seventh day after His six days of labor, so the present earth will enjoy 1,000 years of rest after its 6,000 years of labor. This thousand years of rest will begin “When His Son, coming [again], shall destroy the time of the wicked man, and judge the ungodly, and change the sun, and the moon, and the stars.” In other words, the thousand years of rest will begin in conjunction with the Second Coming of Christ.

 

The epistle further stated that after the earth’s seventh day (thousand years of rest), there will be an “eighth day, that is, a beginning of another world.” It would appear that this “eighth day” is a reference to the future eternal state with the new eternal earth after the thousand-year Millennium.

 

Justin Martyr

 

Justin Martyr lived from approximately 100 to 165 A.D. He was well-educated. He held no regular church office but served as a traveling evangelist and defender of Christianity. In his writings he argued for the superiority of Christianity to paganism and Judaism. On his second journey to Rome he was arrested, lashed, and beheaded because of his testimony for Christ.

 

In his writing entitled Dialogue With Trypho Justin stated, “But I and others, who are right-minded Christians on all points, are assured that there will be a resurrection of the dead, and a thousand years in Jerusalem, which will then be built, adorned, and enlarged, [as] the prophets Ezekiel and Isaiah and others declare.” His use of the expression right-minded Christians on all points was his way of asserting that Premillennialism was the orthodox view in his day.

 

Again Justin said,

 

And further, there was a certain man with us, whose name was John, one of the apostles of Christ, who prophesied, by a revelation that was made to him, that those who believed in our Christ would dwell a thousand years in Jerusalem; and that thereafter the general, and, in short, the eternal resurrection and judgment of all men would likewise take place.

 

In this statement Justin referred to John’s declarations in Revelation 20. In that passage John asserted that Christ and His saints will reign for 1,000 years. Justin’s statement indicates that he understood John to be referring to 1,000 literal years.

 

Irenaeus

 

Irenaeus received his early Christian training from Polycarp, Bishop of Symrna in western Asia Minor. Polycarp had been a disciple of the Apostle John. Irenaeus may have served under Polycarp for several years before being sent to Gaul (France) as a missionary. Around 178 A.D. Irenaeus became Bishop of Lyons in Gaul. There he continued to serve effectively during the last quarter of the second century.

 

Irenaeus wrote the following concerning the blessings of the future Kingdom of God foretold in the Scriptures:

 

The predicted blessing, therefore, belongs unquestionably to the times of the kingdom, when the righteous shall bear rule upon their rising from the dead; when also the creation, having been renovated and set free, shall fructify with an abundance of all kinds of food, from the dew of heaven, and from the fertility of the earth: as the elders who saw John, the disciple of the Lord, related that they had heard from him how the Lord used to teach in regard to these times.

 

Irenaeus declared that in conjunction with the future Kingdom and its renovation of nature, the Lord promised great fruitage of vines, abundance of grain, large productivity of fruit-bearing trees, seeds and grass, “and that all animals feeding [only] on the productions of the earth, should [in those days] become peaceful and harmonious among each other, and be in perfect subjection to man.”

 

According to Irenaeus, in Isaiah 11:6–9 Isaiah prophesied concerning this future time when all animals will be tame and vegetarian in diet as they were before the fall of man. Commenting on this prophecy, he said, “And it is right that when the creation is restored, all the animals should obey and be in subjection to man, and revert to the food originally given by God (for they had been originally subjected in obedience to Adam), that is, the productions of the earth.”

 

Irenaeus warned against any attempts to allegorize the Kingdom prophecies: “If, however, any shall endeavor to allegorize [prophecies] of this kind, they shall not be found consistent with themselves in all points and shall be confuted by the teaching of the very expression [in question].”

 

With regard to prophecies concerning the resurrection of saints, Irenaeus wrote:

 

For all these and other words were unquestionably spoken in reference to the resurrection of the just, which takes place after the coming of Antichrist, and the destruction of all nations under his rule; in [the times of] which [resurrection] the righteous shall reign in the earth, waxing stronger by the sight of the Lord; and through Him they shall become accustomed to partake in the glory of God the Father, and shall enjoy in the kingdom intercourse and communion with the holy angels.

 

Along the same lines he said the following concerning John’s comments in Revelation 20:

 

“John, therefore, did distinctly foresee the first ‘resurrection of the just,’ and the inheritance in the kingdom of the earth; and what the prophets have prophesied concerning it harmonize [with his vision].”

 

These statements indicate that Irenaeus was convinced that saints will be resurrected from the dead to reign with Christ in His Kingdom on this earth. Concerning conditions on the earth during the Kingdom he said, “But in the times of the kingdom, the earth has been called again by Christ [to its pristine condition], and Jerusalem rebuilt after the pattern of the Jerusalem above.”

 

Irenaeus stated that after the times of the Kingdom, the great white throne will appear, the present heavens and earth will flee away, the unjust will be resurrected and judged, the new heaven and earth will come into existence, and the new Jerusalem will descend from heaven to earth.

 

Tertullian

 

Tertullian lived from approximately 160 to 220 A.D. He was thoroughly trained for politics, the practice of law, and public debate. After he was converted around 195 A.D. he devoted his life to the defense of Christianity against paganism, Judaism, and heresy. He opposed infant baptism, promoted the Traducian theory of the origin of the human soul, and developed the term trinity to describe the Godhead. In the later years of his life he became associated with Montanism, a movement which some regarded to be a heretical sect.

 

In a work which he wrote before his association with Montanism, Tertullian stated, “But we do confess that a kingdom is promised to us upon the earth, although before heaven, only in another state of existence; inasmuch as it will be after the resurrection for a thousand years.”

 

Then he wrote, “After its thousand years are over, … there will ensue the destruction of the world and the conflagration of all things at the judgments.”

 

Lactantius

 

Lactantius lived from approximately 240 to 320 A.D. He was trained in rhetoric (the effective use of language in literature and oratory). By 290 A.D. he had been appointed by Emperor Diocletian to teach rhetoric at a school in Nicomedia. He became a Christian around 300 A.D. and suffered greatly under the persecution by Emperor Galerius. After Emperor Constantine granted freedom to the Church and declared himself a Christian, he appointed Lactantius to be the personal teacher of his son. Through his writings in defense of Christianity he became known as “the Christian Cicero.” Jerome designated him the most learned man of his time. Eusebius and Augustine honored him.

 

Lactantius wrote,

 

And as God labored six days in building such great works, so His religion and the truth must labor during these six thousand years, while malice prevails and dominates. And again, since He rested on the seventh day from His completed labors and blessed that day, so it is necessary that, at the end of the six thousandth year, all evil be abolished from the earth, and that justice reign for a thousand years, and that there be tranquility and rest from the labors which the world is now enduring for so long.

 

Lactantius understood that the end of this present age will be characterized by a time of unprecedented tribulation:

 

As the end of this age is drawing near, therefore, it is necessary that the state of human affairs be changed and fall to a worse one, evil growing stronger, so that these present times of ours, in which iniquity and malice have advanced to a very high peak, can be judged, however, happy and almost golden in comparison with that irremediable evil.

 

He followed this statement with an amazing description of the future Tribulation period.

 

Although he lived while Rome was the great world power, Lactantius was convinced from the prophetic Scriptures that Rome would be destroyed and that then the rule of the world would shift from the west to the east: “This will be the cause of the destruction and confusion, that the Roman name, by which the world is now ruled—the mind shudders to say it, but I will say it, because it is going to be—will be taken from the earth, and power will be returned to Asia, and again the Orient will dominate and the West will serve.”

 

Lactantius believed that at His Second Coming Christ will war against and judge Antichrist and his godless forces. Then “the dead will rise again, … so that they may reign with God for a thousand years after being again restored to life.”

 

He said of Jesus, “When He shall have destroyed injustice and made the great judgment and restored to life those who were just from the beginning, He will stay among men for a thousand years and will rule them with just dominion.”

 

Lactantius described conditions of the future Kingdom:

 

Then, those who will be living in bodies will not die, but will generate an infinite multitude during those same thousand years, … Those who will be raised from the dead will be in charge of the living as judges.

 

At this same time, also, the prince of demons who is the contriver of all evils will be bound in chains, and he will be in custody for the thousand years of the heavenly power whereby justice will reign on earth, lest any evil be exerted against the people of God … the holy city will be set up in the center of the earth in which the Founder Himself may abide with the just who are its rulers.

 

Lactantius claimed that the earth will be transformed; the sun will be more effective; fertility will be great; crops will be abundant, and animals will be tame. In light of these changes he said:

 

Men will enjoy, therefore, the most tranquil and most abundant life, and they will reign together with God. Kings of the nations will come from the ends of the earth with gifts and presents to adore and honor the great King, whose name will be famous and venerable to all peoples which will be under heaven and to the kings who will rule on the earth.

 

Lactantius asserted that at the end of the thousand years Satan will be set loose to lead a final revolt. God will crush the revolt and judge Satan forever. The unjust will be resurrected to everlasting sufferings. Heaven and earth will change drastically.

 

This examination of early Church leaders indicates that they were, indeed, Premillennial by conviction. (Renald E. Showers, There Really Is a Difference!: A Comparison of Covenant and Dispensational Theology [Bellmawr, N.J.: The Friends of Israel Gospel Ministry, Inc., 1990], 119–126)

 

Further Reading:

 

Brian Collins, "Were the Fathers Amillennial? An Evaluation of Charles Hill's Regnum Caelorum," Bibliotheca Sacra 177 (April-June 2020): 207-20

 

Blog Archive