Friday, September 18, 2026

James P. Ware on Isaiah 56:6-7

  

The priestly character of the gentiles’ offerings is prominent in Hebrew Isaiah 56:6–7. The term used for their ministry in 56:6 is שׁרת , the regular word in the Hebrew Bible for the service of the priests and Levites. The same word is used in Isaiah 61:6, where it is rendered in the LXX by λειτουργός: ὑμεῖς δὲ ἱερεῖς κυρίου κληθήσεσθε, λειτουργοὶ θεοῦ, “but you will be called priests of the Lord, ministers of God” (61:6). With only one exception, the Hebrew verb שׁרת is consistently translated in the LXX by the Greek verb λειτουργέω and its cognates, which as we have seen throughout the Bible, when used in the context of worship, always connote priestly or sacerdotal functions.

 

The priestly character of the service of the gentiles in Isaiah 56:6–7 is also evident in all ancient Greek translations – except the LXX. Unlike the other ancient Greek versions, the priestly function of the gentiles is obscured in the Septuagint translation of Isaiah 56:6, which renders שׁרת as δουλεύω rather than λειτουργέω. The reason for this, as scholars are widely agreed, was the Septuagint Isaiah translator’s discomfort with the passage’s depiction of gentiles as exercising Levitical functions. Only once among its many occurrences in the Old Testament is the Hebrew verb שׁרת translated in the LXX with δουλεύω rather than λειτουργέω or its cognates – here in LXX Isaiah 56:6! Aquila, Symmachus, and Theodotion, by contrast, all translate שׁרת in Isaiah 56:6 with λειτουργέω. This is significant, for it suggests that Isaiah 56:6–7 may underlie not only Philippians 4:18, but also the larger theme of the Philippians’ sacrifice developed throughout the letter. For if, as we know he does elsewhere (e. g. 1 Cor 15:54), Paul is here utilizing a Greek text of Isaiah stemming from the “proto-Theodotion” recension, it is likely that Isaiah 56:6–7 is the source, not only of Paul’s language of “an acceptable sacrifice” (θυσία δεκτή) in Philippians 4:18, but also of Paul’s characterization of the Philippians’ labor for the gospel as a “priestly ministry” (λειτουργία and its cognates) throughout the letter (2:17; 2:25: 2:30). (James P. Ware, “The Servants of the Servant in Isaiah and Philippians,” in Isaiah’s Servants in Early Judaism and Christianity: The Isaian Servant and the Exegetical Formation of Community Identity, ed. Jacob Stromberg and Michael A. Lyons [Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2. Reihe 554; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2021], 263-64)

 

 

Holly J. Carey on Allusions to Isaiah 52-53 in Wisdom of Solomon 1-6

  

Allusions to Isa 52-53 in Wis 2 and 5

 

The emphasis on the unjust actions of the wicked against the righteous man in Wis 2 and 5 provide a natural connection to the similar experiences of the Servant in Isa 52–53. It is in these sections where we find the highest concentration of allusions to the fourth Servant Song, even though verbal agreement is rare. The following is a list of potential allusions to Isa 52–53 in Wis 2 and 5, followed by some brief observations on recurring patterns and emphases.

 

1. Wis 2:12 (Isa 53:11): both figures are called the “righteous one” (δίκαιος).

2. Wis 2:13 (Isa 52:13): both figures who suffer at the hands of enemies are described as

πᾶις (of God).

3. Wis 2:14 (Isa 53:2): the πᾶις is described as one whose appearance is repulsive – his

oppressors do not even want to look at him.

4. Wis 2:16 (Isa 52:13; 53:11): the πᾶις is accused by the wicked of claiming God as his

father, emphasizing the relationship between the righteous man and God over against

that of his adversaries.

5. Wis 2:19–20 (Isa 53:7–9): the righteous man’s defining characteristics of gentleness

and patience are challenged by his enemies, as he is given a shameful death.

6. Wis 2:21 (Isa 53:4): the reasoning (λογίζομαι) of his enemies against him is determined

faulty.

7. Wis 2:21 (Isa 53:6): those who oppose God’s Servant/righteous man have “gone

astray” (ἐπλανήθησαν).

8. Wis 5:1 (Isa 52:13): the Servant’s/righteous man’s lowly position will not last forever.

He will be lifted up (Isaiah) and stand in the presence of his enemies (Wisdom).

9. Wis 5:1 (Isa 53:4): the one exalted was the same one who was abused by his enemies.

10. Wis 5:2 (Isa 52:14, 15): the enemies of the righteous man will be amazed when he is

saved.

11. Wis 5:3–4 (Isa 53:3–4, 10): the wicked recall how they derided the righteous one and

withheld honor from him, even as they realize they were wrong.

12. Wis 5:5 (Isa 53:12): the Servant/righteous man will be allotted a reward for his commitment

to God.

13. Wis 5:6–7 (Isa 53:6): in the confessions of the enemies, they acknowledge that they

have “gone astray” (ἐπλανήθημεν) from “the way of truth/the Lord” (ὁδοῦ ἀληθείας

… ὁδὸν κυρίου, Wis) or while going their own “way” (τῇ ὁδῷ, Isa).

14. Wis 5:8–13 (Isa 53:9): wickedness is tied to wealth in both passages. While the Servant

identifies with the poor and afflicted, his enemies (wrongly) identify him with the

wicked and the rich (Isaiah). The righteous man’s enemies, however, reflect upon the

emptiness of their investment in arrogance and wealth.

 

It is interesting to note that many of the allusions to Isa 52–53 in Wis 2 and 5 are descriptive in nature, focusing on either the physical or spiritual characteristics of the Servant/righteous man. Both figures have appearances that are repulsive to their enemies. Both are mocked for what should be considered admirable qualities (gentleness and patience), but in the skewed worldview of their persecutors, these are regarded as signs of weakness and shame. This is because the wicked have “gone astray” – they are not following the ways of God and therefore cannot and will not judge rightly. In both texts, the protagonist’s relationship with God is called into question by his enemies. This is ironic, as it becomes clear at the end of these sections that the Servant/righteous man was indeed a πᾶις of God since both are vindicated in the presence of their enemies, as is indicated by the confessions from the mouths of the wicked themselves. (Holly J. Carey, “The Servants in Wisdom of Solomon,” in Isaiah’s Servants in Early Judaism and Christianity: The Isaian Servant and the Exegetical Formation of Community Identity, ed. Jacob Stromberg and Michael A. Lyons [Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2. Reihe 554; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2021], 125-26)

 

 

 

Allusions to Isa 52-53 in Wis 1-6

 

There are a number of allusions to Isa 52–53 in the larger context of the first section of Wisdom (1–6), but particularly in the section between the two monologues of the wicked concerning the righteous man they persecuted (Wis 3–4). As mentioned earlier, these chapters are from the narrator’s perspective, offering thoughts on the futility of the wicked’s reasoning and actions. These too have a profound impact on Wis 2 and 5, as they reflect upon what the wicked have (falsely) reasoned in Wis 2, and because they help to set the stage for their admittance of guilt in Wis 5:

 

1. Wis 3:2–3 (Isa 53:4): the Servant is hurt at the hands of enemies who follow their own

reasoning (λογίζομαι).

2. Wis 3:2–3 (Isa 53:4, 8): the affliction of the Servant/righteous man is reiterated.

3. Wis 3:6 (Isa 53:7–10): the lives of the Servant and the righteous man are understood

as an offering.

4. Wis 3:9; 4:15 (Isa 52:13): those who are the Lord’s can find comfort in his acts on

their behalf.

5. Wis 3:13–4:6 (Isa 53:2, 10): the problem of the sterility and premature death of the

Servant/righteous man is overcome in vindication.

6. Wis 4:19 (Isa 52:15): in an ironic role-reversal, when the Servant/righteous man is

vindicated, his enemies will be speechless.

 

Of particular note concerning these allusions to Isa 52–53 in Wis 3–4 is that each of these allusions fall under two major categories: suffering and vindication. We will examine the impact of this more thoroughly in the discussion of shared themes between the Servant passages in Isaiah and Wisdom in a moment. For now, it will suffice to simply recognize that these two themes are of crucial importance from the narrator’s perspective, as he reflects on the folly of the

enemies of the righteous man. (Holly J. Carey, “The Servants in Wisdom of Solomon,” in Isaiah’s Servants in Early Judaism and Christianity: The Isaian Servant and the Exegetical Formation of Community Identity, ed. Jacob Stromberg and Michael A. Lyons [Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2. Reihe 554; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2021], 127-28)

 

DEBATE: Is The Trinity Biblical & Coherent? Sijuwade vs. Ostler

 

DEBATE: Is The Trinity Biblical & Coherent? Sijuwade vs. Ostler






The Importance of the Writings of Thomas Aquinas in the 1917 Code of Canon Law

 The following from the 1917 Pio-Benedictine Code of Canon law requires seminary professors and religious to formally study the writings of Aquinas:

 

Canon 589

 

§ 1. Religious correctly instructed in lower disciplines shall diligently pursue philosophical studies for at least two years and sacred theology for at least four years, adhering to the teachings of D[om] Thomas according to the norm of Canon 1366, § 2, according to the instructions of the Apostolic See.

Edward N. Peters, The 1917 or Pio-Benedictine Code of Canon Law: In English Translation with Extensive Scholarly Apparatus (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2001), 227.

 

§ 1. Religiosi in inferioribus disciplinis rite instructi, in philosophiae studia saltem per biennium et sacrae theologiae saltem per quadriennium, doctrinae D. Thomae inhaerentes ad normam can. 1366, § 2, diligenter incumbant, secundum instructiones Apostolicae Sedis.

Benedicti Papae XV and PII X Pontificis Maximi, Codex Iuris Canonici (Neo-Eboraci: P. J. Kenedy & Sons, 1918), 170.

 

 

Canon 1366

 

§ 2. Professors shall treat studies in rational theology and philosophy and the instruction of students in these disciplines according to the system, teaching, and principles of the Angelic Doctor and hold to them religiously.

Edward N. Peters, The 1917 or Pio-Benedictine Code of Canon Law: In English Translation with Extensive Scholarly Apparatus (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2001), 460.

 

§ 2. Philosophiae rationalis ac theologiae studia et alumnorum in his disciplinis institutionem professores omnino pertractent ad Angelici Doctoris rationem, doctrinam et principia, eaque sancte teneant.

Benedicti Papae XV and PII X Pontificis Maximi, Codex Iuris Canonici (Neo-Eboraci: P. J. Kenedy & Sons, 1918), 398.

Thursday, September 17, 2026

Cyril of Alexandria on Isaiah 7:15-16

  

Hence before the child knows good or evil, he will desert evil to choose the good. In other words, before human beings reach puberty and have not yet arrived at maturity, the time when respect is shown for good sense, they are completely unable to discern what is bad and what is good; but when that age summons them to it, then they exercise free will in their behavior. They divine nature in its loftiness, not being in a condition like us but in its characteristic elevation that is proper to it, never allows an approach of evil; it resists the forms of depravity, is unaffected by them, is subject to no upheaval, being instead by nature and essence intolerant of evil. It would be no different, in my view, from your saying in reference to light that it does not tolerate darkness; it cannot bring itself to experience what is not light. So he conveys the permanent attachment of the divine nature to good by saying, He will desert evil to choose the good. Now, this is also true of Christ himself, since he is born of the holy Virgin according to the flesh, being God by nature and coming as the Word from God, he was from the womb and before it—or, rather even before every age, being holy in being God, and not forfeiting his proper prerogatives as a result of his humanity; and on the other hand not failing in his human characteristics as a result of the Incarnation. The purpose was to confirm that he was really like us, and to hallow our very creation. (Cyril of Alexandria, Commentary on Isaiah, 3 vols. [trans. Robert Charles Hill; Brookline, Mass.: Holy Cross Orthodox Press, 2008], 1:169-70)

 

Wednesday, September 16, 2026

George Forman Sr. and Joseph Smith’s 56-year prophecy not being interpreted as a prediction of the date of the Parousia

  

Arpil, 1891. President Abram Hatch and William Buys gave us a good letter to Attorney Yarion and President Abram Hatch was in Salt Lake City and spoke to Governor Thomas and sos got him out.

 

As per Joseph Smith's prophesy that 56 years would wind up the scene so it did as judge Zane received a revelation to not send any more U.C. to the pen. To just fine them.

 

1890. In this year it is said the Messiah came and organized the Indians near Walker Lake, Nevada, We hear that there is an Indian called and known as the Indian Prophet. (William Forman Sr. genealogy and diary, ed. William Forman [1971], p.41, Church History Library, MS 22398, spelling in original retained)

 

 

Further Reading:

 

Resources on Joseph Smith’s Prophecies (e.g., Did Joseph Smith Predict that the Second Coming would happen in 1890/91?)

 

William Forman Sr. recording Abram Chase Hatch Teaching that “few will receive celestial glory” (October 27, 1883)

  

October 27th, 1883, Sunday -- John Muir saw some of the people of Salt Lake City. Expects the legislature to pass a law to please the officers. Some are expecting the man to come who is to be mighty and strong to divide the inheritance. Says a great many are falling away and men and women are drinking in the saloons. President A. Hatch said we have the most perfect code of laws given to us as a people. Thinks that very few men observe all the laws. Thinks that few will receive celestial glory. He said that the Presidency of Makers will have to observe all the law or they will not be worthy examples. The High Counsel and Bishops are to be men of example. There are a few of the simple laws we have not observed. He does not say that's because we have not kept all that law that we will be cast out. The time is near when those who attend saloons will not have a name with us. (William Forman Sr. genealogy and diary, ed. William Forman [1971], p.27, Church History Library, MS 22398)

 

Blog Archive