Wednesday, September 30, 2026

Matthew J. Grey and Richard Neitzel Holzapfel on the Use of εγω ειμι in John 18:6

  

Jesus’s simple response, “I am he,” is more theologically loaded than the King James Version suggests. First, note that “he” is italicized. In the King James Bible, words that were added by the translators but that are not found in the original Greek manuscripts are placed in italics. These added words were meant to make the translation more readable when it was difficult to find a corollary word in English. To ensure that the reader knows that these words were not in the original manuscripts, they are printed in italics.

 

While in some instances this type of clarification is helpful, in others it can obscure the intended nuances of the Greek text. In the case of Jesus’s utterance in the garden, removing the italicized word renders Jesus’s response as “I AM” (Greek: ego-eimi). Therefore, Jesus’s response is not merely an indication that he is the one the arresting party is looking for; rather it is a declaration of the divine name of God from the Old Testament. For instance, the story of Moses’s encounter with God at the burning bush reads: “Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me not you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them? And God said unto Moses, I Am That I Am: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you” (Exodus 3:13-14).

 

In uttering the name I AM, therefore, Jesus seems to be referring to himself as the God who appeared to Moses and who desires the full trust of his people. Jesus applied this same name to himself earlier in John’s Gospel (see, for example, John 8:58), and in this moment in the garden, he applies it to himself again. To heighten the impact o this declaration during Jesus’s arrest, John notes that the large, armed party of Roman soldiers and Jewish temple police all step backward and fall to the ground in response (see John 18:6; cf. Psalms 27:2; 35:4). In doing so, John describes Jesus’s adversaries as falling to the ground in the garden, rather than Jesus falling to the ground as recorded in the Gethsemane narratives of Mark and Matthew.

 

These details in John’s Gospel suggest that Jesus, as God, has power over the forces of darkness that have come out to arrest him in the middle of the night with torches. His statement of “I AM” reinforces the idea that Jesus could not have been arrested unless he permitted it. That belief is further substantiated by Jesus when he later stands before Pilate and says: “Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above” (John 19:11). In these remarkable ways, John’s account of Jesus’s final night replaces the synoptic emphasis on Jesus’s suffering in Gethsemane with an emphasis on Jesus’s revelation of his divine identity in the garden. (Matthew J. Grey and Richard Neitzel Holzapfel, A Place Called Gethsemane: Seeing the New Testament Story and Site in Its First-Century Context [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 2025], 58-59)

 

Tuesday, September 29, 2026

The TRUTH About Eucharistic Miracles? A Catholic Chemist Investigates (w/ Dr. Stacy Trasancos)

 

The TRUTH About Eucharistic Miracles? A Catholic Chemist Investigates (w/ Dr. Stacy Trasancos)





Trasancos is a Catholic, but, unlike some, not obsessed with prepubescent children, unlike some people . . . 

The Salvation and "Baptism" of Old Testament-Era Saints in "Greek Fragments: Abū Qurrah Was Questioned by an Unbeliever"

  

Unbeliever: Christ declared, “Whoever has not been begotten of water and Spirit will not enter the kingdom of heaven.” What of the righteous who lived before his coming and were not baptized? How can they enter it?

 

Christian: Christ was baptized for them, even as he died for all. It is as he said, “I sanctify myself for them.” At the same time, they too were baptized in a bodily manner.

 

Unbeliever: How can this be?

 

Christian: Don’t you know that those who die are not completely destroyed? Rather, they are dissolved into their composite elements.

 

Unbeliever: That’s true.

 

Christian: It is written that when he was pierced in the side by the lance, water and blood flowed from his side.

 

Unbeliever: Indeed.

 

Christian: Accordingly, when that water was dissolved into the elements, he sanctified all things and baptized those who had been dispersed and dissolved into the elements.

 

Unbeliever: On this account, unbelievers and absolutely all who died before his coming were baptized.

 

Christian: Not at all. Rather, only the bodies of believers, whose souls had faith in Christ when he (that is, his holy soul) descended into hell. Here’s an analogy. Imagine an aqueduct or river of fresh water, one with many trees planted along its banks. Some of these trees are dead and totally desiccated; others are still alive. What do you think? When the water touches them, will all the trees benefit by drawing up water and life, or only those with the ability to receive or attract it? Those that are completely dry will benefit not in the least from the water. In the same way, unbelievers will benefit not in the least from the dissolution of that water into the elements. (“Greek Fragments: Abū Qurrah Was Questioned by an Unbeliever,” in Theodore Abū Qurrah [trans. John C. Lamoreaux; Brigham Young University Middle Eastern Texts Initiative; Library of the Christian East 1; Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 2005], 254)

 

Witnesses Of The Resurrection Compared to Book of Mormon Witnesses

 

Witnesses Of The Resurrection Compared to Book of Mormon Witnesses







Monday, September 28, 2026

Harriet Jane Osborn’s Patriarchal Blessing from 1882 and "war [being] poured out upon all generations" in the Then-Future

 David Osborn (1807-1893), in his journal for September 6, 1882, recording his daughter’s patriarchal blessing:

 

While I was at Montpelier, Jane gave me a Patriarchal Blessing she received last spring, which I will here record for safe keeping, by Thos. R. McCaxin.

 

Sister Harriet J., in the name of Jesus of Nasareth, I place my hands upon thy head to bless you with a father's blessing. The heavens shall be opened to you and thou shalt converse with Angels and with the Church of the First Born, and the Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon thee and it will lead thee into all truth. Thou shall receive much valuable information concerning the Genealogies of the dead, for thy lineage is of Joseph and thou shall go into the Temple of the Lord and receive thy washings and annointings, and shall represent thy Father's and Mother's House in the interests of humanity until thou art satisfied; for they have heard of thy privilege in as much as it is a Dispensation of building Temples, that thou wouldst remember them. And thou should go into the Sisters meeting and bear thy testimony of the goodness of God. And thou shalt pray in secret and be rewarded openly. And thou shalt have the gift of discernment, and have power over foul spirits, to rebuke them. And the Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon thee. And thy mind shall be enlightened by its blessed influence. And thou shalt be able to discern thy cunning of Satan. Thy name shall be had in honorable remembrance among the Daughters of Israel, and shall be handed down from generation to generation, in as much as thou wilt seek unto the Lord and observe his commandments. Thou shalt see many signs of the coming of thy Redeemer. Thou shalt see many hearts fail them for fear of the things that are coming upon the earth. Thou shalt see the Heavens clothed with blackness and war poured out upon all generations. Thou shalt see signs in the Sun and in the Moon. Thou shalt see Israel returned from the North where they have been hid up for a long time bringing with them the Records of Jesus, and an account of God's dealings with them. And thou shalt see the Lamanites become a white and delightsome people, and turn unto the Lord with full purpose of heart. And thou shalt teach thy children the ways of the Lord, and plant in their minds the Standard of Truth, and the time worn ages of Eternity will not obliterate it. I seal these Blessings upon Thee through thy faithfulness and I seal thee up to come forth in the morning of the first Resurrection, and against the powers of the destroyer. Amen. (David Osborn, Journal, September 6, 1882, in Personal Journal of David Osborn, c. 1964, [69], emphasis in bold added, Church History Library, MS 23445, copy in my possession)

 

Harriet Jane received her patriarchal blessing 18 years after the end of the U.S. Civil War. However, the patriarchal blessing uses the language of war being poured out at a then-future time (cf. D&C 87:2). This indicates that Latter-day Saints did not interpret D&C 87 to speak of one then-future war (i.e., the U.S. Civil War) that would spread all over the world (a criticism some critics raise against D&C 87).

 

Further Reading:

 

Resources on Joseph Smith’s Prophecies


The Epiclesis as the Moment of the Eucharistic Transformation in "Refutations of the Saracens by Theodore Abū Qurrah"

  

Theodore: Understand our sacrament to take place in the same manner. The priest puts the bread and wine on the holy altar; and when he prays the sacred Eucharistic prayer, the Holy Spirit descends on the gifts placed there. Through the fire of his divinity, he transforms the bread and wine into Christ’s body and blood, no less than the liver transforms food into the body of a person. Or don’t you concede, my friend, that the Holy Spirit can do what the liver can do? (“Refutations of the Saracens by Theodore Abū Qurrah, the Bishop of Harran, As Reported by John the Deacon,” in Theodore Abū Qurrah [trans. John C. Lamoreaux; Brigham Young University Middle Eastern Texts Initiative; Library of the Christian East 1; Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 2005], 220)

 

Sunday, September 27, 2026

David Osborn (1807-1893): Did He Believe Joseph Smith Predicted the Second Coming in 1890/91?

In his journal for April 20, 1874, David Osborn recorded his reminiscence of Joseph Smith’s teachings concerning seeing Jesus if he were to live to 85 years of age (cf. D&C 130:15):

 

In one of his discourses at Nauvoo he said at one time he inquired of the Lord how long or how many years it would be till He would come? He said the answer he received was this: "My servant, Joseph, if you live to be eighty five years old, you shall see my face." In reading his history I find that at the dedication of the Temple at Kirtland, which was in the year 1835, he prophesied the 56 years more would bring the winding up scene of this generation. Which will bring this important event to take place in the year '90 or '91. (David Osborn, Journal, April 20, 1874, in Personal Journal of David Osborn, c. 1964, [36], Church History Library, MS 23445, copy in my possession)

 

Did Osborn believe that the Second Coming (Parousia) would occur in 1890/91? It appears that his understanding of Joseph Smith’s teachings and the “winding up scene of this generation” was not the Second Coming. For example, on April 3, 1891(!) we read the following:

 

Again I have thought if I had my life to live over again I could improve in another direction. Our errand or chief purpose in coming to this world, was to get a tabernacle of flesh and also to raise up a posterity. Well, I raised up a few children from Cynthia, my first wife, and have never regretted it, but when I lost her why did I not get a wife that was likely to bring me a few more? A question which I can not answer to my own satisfaction. So it seems that I have failed in improving on the talents with which I have been entrusted, and as it is only our privilege to pass through this life but one time, it is too late to make amends. But it may be that provisions may be made to receive wives and increase in the Millennium by proxy. I will wait and see for I did hear Joseph say that our future Kingdom or exaltation depended to a certain extent on the number of our posterity. (David Osborn, Journal, April 3, 1891, in Personal Journal of David Osborn, c. 1964, [92])

 

Here, Osborn speaks of “the Millennium” being a then-future event as of April 1891, and says that he will “wait and see” concerning proxy provision for wives and posterity.

 

Earlier, in an entry for November 20, 1880, Osborn wrote the following:

 

I have received no reply to a very lengthy letter I addressed to S. B. Harrah, my cousin, in Indiana. In this letter I again bore my humble testimony concerning the Latterday work, appealing to the scriptures in proof of the second coming of the Savior and the great events to precede it. (David Osborn, Journal, November 20, 1880, in Personal Journal of David Osborn, c. 1964, [57])

 

What is odd is that he would appeal to Scripture to teach about the truth of the Second Coming, but not make reference to the fact that Jesus would return in ~10 years time (unless Osborn did not believe Joseph Smith was teaching the Parousia would take place in 1890/91).

 

Elsewhere, during a High Priest’s theological class study held December 17, 1883, there is a discussion of the Second Coming, but no reference to it taking place in ~7-8 years time:

 

Last fall we had 6 or 7 Elders more ordained into the High Priests Quorum by our President Br. Roskelly. We were counseled by him to change the order of our meetings into a Theological Class, taking up at each meeting a certain subject or principle of the Gospel to investigate. We have spoken on the following subjects: Faith Repentence and Baptism, The Gift and Office of the Holy Spirit, The Gathering of the House of Israel, The Second Coming of the Savior with all His Saints, The Restitution of all Things Spoken by the Ancient Prophets. I am now engaged in getting the Genealogy of the High Priests in our ward for our President to put on the record of the Cache Valley Stake of Zion. I have written and sent off several letters inquiring for the names and Genealogy of my kindred but get no answer. I have not visited my children at Three Mile or Bear Lake Valley for the past season, it seems a long time since we were together. (David Osborn, Journal, December 17, 1883, in Personal Journal of David Osborn, c. 1964, [71])

 

It appears that Osborn did not interpret Joseph Smith as teaching that the Second Coming/Parousia would take place in 1890/91.

 

Further Reading:

 

Resources on Joseph Smith’s Prophecies (e.g., Did Joseph Smith Predict that the Second Coming would happen in 1890/91?)

Blog Archive