Sunday, March 1, 2026

Lee Martin McDonald on 1 Corinthians 6:3

  

6:3. Do you not know that we shall judge angels? Paul appears to draw on the Greek translation (LXX) of Dan. 7:22 which reads: “… until the Ancient of days came, and he gave judgment to the saints of the Most High; and the time came on, and the saints possessed the kingdom.” The belief in a judgment of God on some of the angels is presupposed in 2 Peter 2:4 and Jude 6, as well as in pre-Christian Jewish literature. Speaking of God’s directive to Michael the archangel (see Jude 9), the author of 1 Enoch (ca. 180 b.c.) writes:

 

Make known to Semyaza [an angel] and the others who are with him, who fornicated with the women, that they will die together with them in all their defilement. And when they and all their children have battled with each other, and when they have seen the destruction of their beloved ones, bind them for seventy generations underneath the rocks of the ground until the day of their judgment and of their consummation, until the eternal judgment is concluded. In those days they will lead them into the bottom of the fire—and in torment—in the prison (where) they will be locked up forever. And at the time when they will burn and die, those who collaborated with them will be bound together with them from henceforth unto the end of (all) generations (1 Enoch 10:11–14, OT Pseud 1:18).

 

This view is presupposed in Paul who believed that bringing minor civil issues before a secular court was a scandal in the church and pleads with his hearers to take care of such matters among themselves. Since they will participate in the judgment of angels, surely they can take care of minor or civil issues themselves. Epictetus (ca. a.d. 54–68) encourages his listeners to worthy behavior that will result in participation with the gods in their rule.

 

So act [properly] toward children, so toward a wife, so toward office, so toward wealth; and then some day you will be worthy of the banquets of the gods. But if you do not take these things [what is inappropriate to take] even when they are set before you, but despise them, then you will not only share the banquets of the gods, but share also their rule (The Encheiridion of Epictetus 15, LCL).

 

Similarly, in Sallustius’ De deis et mundo (Concerning the Gods and the Universe, ca. a.d. 361–3), he claims that the pious, or religious devotees, will share with the gods the governance of the whole universe (Deor. et mund. 21, LCL). (Lee Martin McDonald, “1 Corinthians,” in The Bible Knowledge Background Commentary: Acts-Philemon, ed. Craig A. Evans and Craig A. Bubeck [Colorado Springs, Colo.: David C. Cook, 2004], 286-87)

 

Birthday This Month//For Those Who Want To Support the Blog/Podcast

It will be my birthday in a few days. Last year, some of you kindly purchased some items from my Amazon wishlist. No one is expected to do so, but if you wish to support the blog and/or YT channel, you can do so via:

Amazon Wishlist:


Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com


Alt.:


Paypal


Venmo



Thanks!

Saturday, February 28, 2026

Daniel J. Sahas on the Edict of Leo III (726)

  

The Seventh Ecumenical Council called “‘Saracen-minded”’ Beser, a Christian apostate to Islam who, allegedly, with Constantine bishop of Nacoleia, influenced Leo III to take measures against the icons and their defenders.’ Theophanes called Leo, also, “‘Saracen-minded” for his ideas and his edict against the icons (726).' (Daniel J. Sahas, John of Damascus on Islam: The "Heresy of the Ishmaelites" [Leiden: Brill, 1972], 9-10)

 

Mordechai Cogan on 1 Kings 8:60

  

YHWH, he is God; there is no other. So too Deut 4:35, 39; 7:9. Because the affirmation “there is no other (beside him)” is so frequent in the polemics of Second Isaiah (Isa 45:5, 6, 14, 18, 21, 22; 46:9), Weinfeld sees this as evidence for late (i.e., exilic) origin (1972, 212). But the use of this phrase in the spontaneous outcry of the people at Mt. Carmel (cf. 1 Kgs 18:39) suggests that it may have been a traditional creedal exclamation. (Mordechai Cogan, I Kings: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary [AYB 10; New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008], 288)

 

Is Mormonism Incoherent? Responding to Joe Heschmeyer and Matt Fradd

 

Is Mormonism Incoherent? Responding to Joe Heschmeyer and Matt Fradd






R. ALan Streett on the Phrase "for the forgiveness of sins" (εἰς ἄφεσιν ἁμαρτιῶν) in Matthew 26:28

  

In the Matthaean version of Luke 22:20, the words are added, “for the forgiveness of sins” (Matt 26:28). Carter notes this is not a reference to forgiving personal or individual sins. The term ἄφεσιν (“forgiveness” or “release”) is the same word as used in Leviticus 25 (LXX) where it is translated fourteen times as “a Jubilee” and “year of Jubilee,” and refers to a “massive social and economic restructuring (return of land; freeing of slaves . . . remission of debt, etc.).” Seen from this perspective, Jesus’ impending death establishes a new covenant in which those under sin (i.e., under a world ruled by the oppressors) will be set free in a restructured world where God, not the elites, will rule. (R. Alan Streett, Subversive Meals: An Analysis of the Lord’s Supper Under Roman Domination During the First Century [Eugene, Oreg.: Pickwick Publications, 2013], 190)

 

R. Alan Streett on the Sacrifical Connotatoins of δίδωμι in Luke 22:19

  

The Body

 

Jesus follows standard Passover procedure by blessing, breaking, and distributing the unleavened bread, which is called the “bread of affliction” in Deut 16:3. Jesus next departs from tradition by connecting the bread with his person: “This is my body.” That he speaks metaphorically is evident, since his actual body is reclining on the couch. In this sense the verb “is” indicates representation, not identification. Does Jesus see himself as taking the affliction which is meted out by the forces of tyranny? In executing God’s eschatological spokesperson, Roman and Jewish authorities stand opposed to God’s kingdom agenda.

 

Then Jesus adds the explicatory words, “which is given for you.” Luke uses the term “given” (δίδωμι) elsewhere to connote a sacrificial offering (Luke 2:24) and other writers use it similarly (see Mark 10:45; John 6:51; 2 Cor 8:5; Gal 1:4). The phrase “for you” (ὑπὲρ ὑμῶν) likely means for your sake or on your behalf, and likely has vicarious implications. Since this was not the ordinary meaning assigned to unleavened bread at Passover, the new explanation must have caught the apostles off guard. Although confused they may have associated it with the messianic woes. Whatever the case, Jesus’ affliction would somehow work out to their benefit. (R. Alan Streett, Subversive Meals: An Analysis of the Lord’s Supper Under Roman Domination During the First Century [Eugene, Oreg.: Pickwick Publications, 2013], 184, emphasis in bold added)

 

Blog Archive