I *might* be able to get into an experimental treatment program beginning in the summer (around June). I used to work in medical/hospital accounts for a few years, so been using my contacts to try to find the best private treatment one can get (unless I have to, I will not go down the public route—lengthy waiting lists, hit-and-miss treatment—downsides of a socialized medicine system).
Scriptural Mormonism
Sunday, March 29, 2026
Update for those curious
Joseph A. Fitzmyer on 1 Corinthians 6:17
17. But whoever is joined to the
Lord becomes one spirit (with him). Lit. “is one spirit” (hen pneuma), in contrast to “one body”
or “one flesh” of v. 16. One would have expected Paul to say “becomes one body”
with the Lord, but instead he shifts because of his often-used contrast of
“flesh” and “spirit.” The union of Christians with the Lord is real, but on a
different level; it has nothing to do with “flesh,” for it is of a spiritual
nature, being an intimate union with the risen Lord. As such, it precludes all
free and casual use of the body (or flesh) in sexual intercourse. “Being joined
to the Lord” means that a Christian cannot be “joined to a prostitute,” even in
a casual act. The quotation of Gen 2:24, which per se refers to the union of
man and women in the marital act, now suggests that the spiritual union of the
Christian with “the Lord” has a marital connotation (recall 6:13e: the body is
“meant for the Lord”). Whoever thus joins himself to the Lord transcends human
bodily existence and acquires a new identity, as one becomes “one spirit” with
Christ (see Baldanza, “L’Uso”). (Joseph A. Fitzmyer, First Corinthians: A New Translation with
Introduction and Commentary [AYB 32; New Haven; London: Yale University
Press, 2008], 268)
Saturday, March 28, 2026
Jennifer Garcia Bashaw and Aaron Higashi on Micah 3:12 and Jeremiah 26:16-18
Micah Is Saved by Jeremiah
Deuteronomy 18:14-22 describes
what a prophet is supposed to be able to do: The criteria for distinguishing
between a false prophet and an authentic one is the prophet’s ability to
accurately predict the future. In other words, if what a prophet says will
happen comes true, then they’re legit.
There are some practical problems
with this criteria. The main one is that if a prophet foretells doom, then
having to wait until after the doom arrives (or doesn’t) to know whether or not
they’re legitimate is a bit of a bummer. In practical terms, a prophet’s
legitimacy becomes something that future generations, not the prophet’s
contemporaries, get to decide. The book of Micah offers an important biblical
example of this.
Writing in the latter part of the
eighth century BCE, when the Neo-Assyrian Empire is coming to destroy
Jerusalem, Micah prophecies that the city will be destroyed, saying, “Zion will
be plowed like a field, Jerusalem will become a heap of rubble, the temple hill
a mound overgrown with thickets” (3:12). He is foretelling that Jerusalem will
be destroyed, just like the capital of northern Israel, Samaria, was destroyed
a short time before.
It turns out, though, that
Jerusalem is not destroyed in Micah’s lifetime or any time in the next century.
Anyone living in Micah’s time would have believed him to be a false prophet according
to the criteria set down in Deuteronomy 18.
But the story has an interesting
twist. More than a hundred years later, at the beginning of the sixth century
BCE, the prophet Jeremiah found himself about to be executed for prophesying
the destruction Jerusalem at the hands of the Babylonians—a message that was
considered by King Zedekiah’s officials to be treasonous. However, Jeremiah 26:16-18
says that the prophet’s execution is halted when some gathered elders recall
that Micah prophesied the same thing.
In this way, a later generation
retroactively legitimized Micah’s prophetic career by finding a new way to interpret
his words. Micah had been speaking about the crisis of the Neo-Assyrian empire,
but Jeremiah’s audience found it more helpful to apply his words to the
Babylonian crisis of a different period. And lo and behold, the Babylonians do
in fact destroy Jerusalem in Jeremiah’s lifetime. (Jennifer Garcia Bashaw and
Aaron Higashi, Serving Up Scripture: How to Interpret the Bible for Yourself
and Others [Minneapolis: Broadleaf Books, 2026], 144-45)
R. C. H. Lenski on 1 Corinthians 6:17
What a difference when one joins himself to the Lord! He becomes one
spirit with the Lord. For while our union with Christ involves also our bodies
as a part of our person it is really a union of the spirit and only as such
includes our bodies. Christ and the Christian become “one spirit,” he in us,
and we in him in a wondrous mystical union. This is the very highest plane that
by what is highest in our being, namely the spirit, lifts us into a union that
is completely spiritual, blessed, and heavenly. This is the unio mystica which is so abundantly
attested in the Scriptures. With no absorption of our spirit into Christ, with
no mingling or fusion of the two, with no loss of the identity of either, our
spirit is joined to Christ’s so that one thought, one desire, one will animate
and control both, namely his thought, desire, and will. This mystical union is
adumbrated in the marital union of husband and wife, Eph. 5:28–33, yet only
adumbrated, for no human relation is capable of doing more. (R. C.
H. Lenski, The Interpretation of St. Paul’s First and Second Epistle to the
Corinthians [Minneapolis, Minn.: Augsburg Publishing House, 1963], 265-66)
Friday, March 27, 2026
Philip W. Comfort on 1 Corinthians 6:17
1 Corinthians 6:17
The expression ο
δε κολλωμενος τω κυριω ἕν πνευμα εστιν (“but the one joining himself to the Lord
is one spirit”) is generally understood to indicate spiritual union between the
believer and Christ. As two bodies join to become one in sexual union, two
spirits join to become one in spiritual union. It is a union of the divine
Spirit with the human spirit; as such “spirit” should not be capitalized—for it
is not just the divine Spirit. The scribes of 𝔓11 and 𝔓46 showed this interpretation by not writing
πνευμα as a nomen sacrum
(a divine title = the Spirit); rather, they wrote out the word in plene. (Philip W. Comfort, New
Testament Text and Translation Commentary: Commentary on the Variant Readings
of the Ancient New Testament Manuscripts and How They Relate to the Major
English Translations [Carol Stream, Ill.: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc.,
2008], 495-96)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2026
(494)
-
▼
March
(78)
- Update for those curious
- Joseph A. Fitzmyer on 1 Corinthians 6:17
- Jennifer Garcia Bashaw and Aaron Higashi on Micah ...
- R. C. H. Lenski on 1 Corinthians 6:17
- "Live-reacting" to the most deceptive Roman Cathol...
- Philip W. Comfort on 1 Corinthians 6:17
- The “Mormon” God In The Bible | Taking On Sam Sham...
- Reviewing the Audience Questions Portion of the Ja...
- Strack and Billerbeck on Human Saliva as a Remedy ...
- Dustin McNab's Pathetic Attempt to Support Sola Sc...
- Strack and Billerbeck on Oil as a valued means of ...
- Crossposting from Youtube: Taking a Break from Soc...
- 5th-century Anonymous Church History on the Nature...
- Philip W. Comfort on Mark 6:3
- Request for Help from those with a large platform ...
- Resources on 1 Thessalonians 3:13 and the Use of t...
- Jens Schröter on the Eucharistic Theology in the D...
- Jens Schröter (RC) on the Eucharistic Theology of ...
- Jens Schröter (RC) on the Eucharistic Theology in ...
- Robert Alter on 2 Chronicles 22:10
- Robert Alter on 2 Chronicles 22:6
- Notes on Mark 6:3 from A Commentary on the New Tes...
- Krister Stendahl on the Use of Sources in Matthew ...
- Transcription of Joel King Noble, Letter to Jonath...
- Raymond E. Brown on the Historicity of the Paschal...
- Samuel W. Beal's Recollection (1938) of Church Lea...
- Raymond E. Brown on the Identity of Barabbas
- Helen Neuenswander (1981) on knowledge of a 7-day ...
- Raymond E. Brown on the Custom of Releasing a Pris...
- Mark Wilson on αρμα (KJV: “Chariot”) in Acts 8:29
- Strack and Billerbeck on Matthew 27:25
- Scriptural Mormonism Podcast Episode 97: Craig Fos...
- Strack and Billerbeck on Jewish/Rabbinical Attitud...
- Examples “Curious Workmanship” in Pre-1830 Literature
- Barabbas (Bar Abba) as a Common Personal Name
- Overview of "40 Questions about Mormonism" by Kyle...
- R. Alan Culpepper on Matthew 27:15-16 and the Bara...
- Ulrich Luz and R. Alan Culpepper on the Use of bot...
- A. T. Robertson on the Present Participle
- Notes on the Present Participle of ἐκχέω (to pour ...
- Joseph Symes (non-LDS) on the Book of Mormon in "T...
- Strack and Billerbeck on "Blood of the Covenant" O...
- Scriptural Mormonism Podcast Episode 96: Jeff Brad...
- Mike Thomas Fails Again on Sola Scriptura
- W. D. Davies and Dale C. Allison Jr., on Matthew 7...
- R. C. H. Lenski on Matthew 25:12 (cf. Matthew 7:23)
- The Earliest Known Use of the Word "Evangelist" Ou...
- Review of Chandler Hendry (LDS) vs. Reitmeier (Cal...
- Strack and Billerbeck on 1 Corinthians 3:12
- Scriptural Mormonism Podcast Episode 95: Islam: A ...
- Robert Alter on 2 Kings 3:27
- Marvin A. Sweeney on 2 Kings 3:26-27
- Examples of Early Christian Interpretations of 2 K...
- Notes on 2 Kings 5:3 and the meaning of צָרַ֫עַת t...
- Paul Corby Finney and Franz Rickert, "Type and Ant...
- Gerd Schunack on "type" and "antitype" in the Exeg...
- J. Andrew Cowan on Genesis 15:6
- J. Andrew Cowan on Psalm 106:30-31 (cf. Numbers 25...
- Crispin Fletcher-Louis on the Depiction of Solomon...
- William Joseph Dalton on "type" and "antitype"
- Mary Lois Walker Morris (1835-1919) on D&C 87
- Yun Lak Chang on the Meaning of "Word of God" in L...
- Yun Lak Chang on the use of λογος and ρημα in Luke...
- Monument 2 from Chalcatzingo
- Jewish Eschatology Acknowledging Changes Due to th...
- Medical Expenses (Liver-related and other issues)
- Robert Alter on the Golden Calves in 1 Kings 12:28
- Alexander Wolfe (2006) on the Authenticity of the ...
- The Bodily Assumption of Mary ("Assumptio S. Maria...
- E. Earle Ellis and the Personal Preexistence of Je...
- Prudence M. Rice (2022) on the "macuahuitl"/macana...
- Jewish/Rabbinical Traditions Concerning the Murder...
- Stephen Boyce on Whether One or Two Angels Were at...
- Lucius Columella (AD 4-70) and Paul's Allegory of ...
- Strack and Billerbeck on the Seat of Moses (cf. Ma...
- Debate Challenge on the Immaculate Conception and ...
- Lee Martin McDonald on 1 Corinthians 6:3
- Birthday This Month//For Those Who Want To Support...
-
▼
March
(78)