Saturday, October 24, 2026

Excerpts from Rodney Turner, "The Blood of the Lamb" (November 13, 1986)

  

The spiritual benefits of the atonement were in force before this earth existed—the Lamb was figuratively slain in eternity. Therefore, original sin or guilt was never inflicted on mankind. The baptism of infants is, as Mormon taught, “solemn mockery before God” (Moron. 8:9). Every child is born whole and innocent regardless of the circumstances of its conception. The Redeemer told Mormon: “The curse of Adam is taken from them in me”. (Moron. 8:8). Thanks to the atonement, original sin or guilt is a theological fossil.

 

. . .

 

Unlike the rest of mankind, Jesus was not conceived in sin, meaning in imperfection (Moses 6:55). When the young virgin asked Gabriel how she was to conceive, he answered: “Of the Holy Ghost, and the power of the Highest. Therefore, that holy child that shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God” (JST Luke 1:35; see 1 Ne. 11:18-2; Alma 7:10; emphasis added). When Mary conceived Jesus her humanity was, for that moment, bathed in the Father’s divinity.

 

Jesus (not Mary) had an “immaculate conception.” It occurred when “the mother of the Son of God . . . was carried away in the Spirit” (1 Ne. 11:18-19; see JST Luke 1:35). The Lamb of God had a heavenly, not an earthly, conception. For this reason, Jesus spoke of himself as the one “whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world” (John 10:36; emphasis added). The Only Begotten in the flesh was the holy child of a holy Father and a sanctified Mother (Moro. 8:3). (Rodney Turner, “The Blood of the Lamb,” Religious Educational Annual Lecture, November 13, 1986, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, pp.12, 22-23, Church History Library, Call no.: M231.23 T951b 1986)

 

 

 

IF NO ATONEMENT

 

But what if that "good news" never came? Had such been the case, mercy would be powerless. Justice would reign supreme...and alone. And there would be no free agency; we would have no say as to our eternal destiny. All mankind would be predestined to perdition. The fall resulted in the entire human race, including newborn infants, becoming lost to God (1 Ne. 10:6; 2 Ne. 2:21; Jacob 7:12; Mosiah 3:16; 16:4). Every man, woman, and child--however virtuous--would be doomed to endless physical and spiritual death, bondage to Satan, and moral devolution, becoming devils themselves (2 Ne. 9:7-9).

 

Consequently, the Father's work and glory, the immortality and eternal life of his children, would be an impossible dream. We fully understood this possibility in our first estate and accepted the risk involved in coming to earth. Why? Because we knew the danger was only theoretical. It would never really happen because our Father would not allow it to happen.

 

To preclude so diabolical a catastrophe, God himself, agreed to meet the just demands of divine law, demands stemming from the Father's gift of free agency to us. This gift cost us nothing, but it came at a fearful price to the Father and his Only Begotten Son.

 

The Father's gracious work required the Only Begotten's gracious atonement. The atonement was the only way the Father could satisfy the just demands of violated law resulting from Adam's transgression and mankind's myriad sins. Sin is the negative use of moral agency. The plan of salvation took into account the inevitable misuse of agency by mankind in its fallen, corrupt state. As Paul wrote: "All have sinned, and come short of the glory of God" (Rom. 3:23). The disease would prove pandemic; the cure had to be universal.

 

Therefore, said Joseph Smith, "At the first organization in heaven we were all present, and saw the Savior chosen and appointed and the plan of salvation made, and we sanctioned it" (TPJS, p. 181). It is a poignant fact that we exercised our agency to sustain the one who died to make it possible. The atonement was an act of law as well as an act of love. (Rodney Turner, “The Blood of the Lamb,” Religious Educational Annual Lecture, November 13, 1986, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, pp. 13-15, Church History Library, Call no.: M231.23 T951b 1986)

 

 

 

WHY THE FATHER COULD NOT ATONE

 

By the same token, the Father could not atone for the sins of his own children. The act of reconciliation required the shedding of blood; it required the death of "the testator" (Heb. 2:17; 9:16-17). Only flesh and blood could atone for flesh and blood. The Father was a resurrected, glorified man of flesh and bone; he had no blood to shed (D&C 130:22). Nor could he die. He was a spiritual being; his spirit and body were "inseparably connected" (D&C 93:33; 88:27; Alma 11:45).

 

Consequently, the Father endowed his Only Begotten with his own nature, attributes and powers. I believe that the Father sent his Beloved Son because he was unable to come himself. He sacrificed his Only Begotten because he could not sacrifice himself.

 

As we have seen, God had to atone. Thus the Only Begotten became the Father's surrogate, possessing, as Paul wrote, "all the fulness of the Godhead bodily" (Col. 2:9; compare D&C 93:14-17).

 

From this perspective, Christ's atonement appears to be a vicarious ordinance performed in behalf of both the Father and his children. The Son glorified the Father by bringing his work--the immortality and eternal life of man--to fruition (Moses 1:39; John 12:28; 13:31-32). The Father and his Beloved Son closely collaborated in working out the salvation of the human family. All this in accordance with the plan of redemption as formulated by the Gods eons before the foundations of this earth were laid. (Rodney Turner, “The Blood of the Lamb,” Religious Educational Annual Lecture, November 13, 1986, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, pp. 26-27, Church History Library, Call no.: M231.23 T951b 1986)

 

 

GETHSEMANE

 

During the Last Supper Jesus told the Twelve: "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends" (John 15:13). Yet Jesus did more than lay down his physical life, he sacrificed his very being, spirit and flesh, for friend and enemy alike.

 

Although the Redeemer's torment of soul reached its climax in Gethsemane, his spiritual pains continued up to the moment he died upon the cross. Luke writes that before Jesus' ordeal began "there appeared an angel unto him from heaven, strengthening him" (Luke 22:43). Was that angel the Father? Although the Holy Ghost had been the Savior's constant companion throughout his ministry (John 1:33; 3:34), the Spirit was obliged to withdraw. Jesus will yet testify: "I have trodden the winepress alone, and none were with me" (D&C 133:50; see 76:107; 88:106).

 

. . .

 

THE CROSS

 

Jesus' unspeakable sufferings on the cross are a tangible reminder of his even more excruciating pains in Gethsemane. When all was done, he said: "It is finished" (John 19:30). "Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit" (Luke 23:46). He was free at last.

 

The death of Jesus Christ fulfilled the law of Moses with its associated feasts (Alma 34:13-14; 3 Ne. 15:5). According to John's gospel, Jesus and his apostles were the last to eat a lawful passover meal. At the very hour the Jews were killing their paschal lambs (about 3 P.M.), Jesus died on the cross. The shadow (the paschal lamb) and its substance (the Lamb of God) died at the same time.

 

Although Jesus was already dead, "one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water" (John 19:34). Was this significant? I believe so. We sing: "Rock of Ages, cleft for me, Let me hide myself in thee; Let the water and the blood, from thy wounded side which flowed, Be of sin the double cure, Save from wrath and make me pure." I believe his blood symbolized the atonement, and the water, baptism. Together they establish the new and everlasting covenant founded upon Christ, the "Rock of Ages."

 

The ordeal finished, the Son of God assumed the fulness of his former glory (John 13:31-32). He had descended into hell, but he did not remain there. Nor will any soul who repents whether in life or in death. (Rodney Turner, “The Blood of the Lamb,” Religious Educational Annual Lecture, November 13, 1986, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, pp. 30-31, 35-36, Church History Library, Call no.: M231.23 T951b 1986)

 

 

(This should not be confused with the mistaken belief that mankind is in bondage to Satan and must be “ransomed” from him. Christ did not ransom us from the devil, but from the demands of justice (Matt. 20:28; 1 Tim. 2:6). Only those who never repent become those sons of Perdition (the “filthy still”) who will be sealed to the devil in the second death following the last judgment (Alma 34:35; D&C 29:41; 63:17; 76:37; 88:35). (Rodney Turner, “The Blood of the Lamb,” Religious Educational Annual Lecture, November 13, 1986, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, p.33, Church History Library, Call no.: M231.23 T951b 1986)

 

 

QUALIFICATIONS FOR MERCY

 

In meeting the demands of justice, the Savior gave life to mercy and she "claimeth all which is her own" (Alma 42:15, 22-23). But for mercy to temper justice, the requirements of divine law must be met by both the the Savior and the saved. The law that required a qualified Redeemer, also requires qualified beneficiaries of his redemptive act. All mankind will be resurrected by pure grace. To that extent, all are saved by pure grace.

 

However, only those who enter into a valid baptismal covenant "with full purpose of heart, acting no hypocrisy and no deception before God, but with real intent" (2 Ne. 31:13) qualify for a fullness of the spiritual blessings of the atonement. The prophet Lehi taught: "Behold, he offereth himself a sacrifice for sin, to answer the ends of the law, unto all those who have a broken heart and a contrite spirit; and unto none else can the ends of the law be answered" (2 Ne. 2:7; see Alma 42:24).

 

The fully repentant will be found "spotless, pure, fair, and white, having been cleansed by the blood of the Lamb, at that great and last day" (Morm. 9:6; see Alma 13:11; 34:36; Rev. 7:14; 12:11). In the resurrection they will be "clothed with purity, yea, even with the robe of righteousness" (2 Ne. 9:14). (Rodney Turner, “The Blood of the Lamb,” Religious Educational Annual Lecture, November 13, 1986, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, pp. 40-41, Church History Library, Call no.: M231.23 T951b 1986)

 

Hyrum P. Jones (1947) and H. Bartley Heiner (1946): Baptism is Both a Symbol and Instrument of the Remission of Our Sins

People often take an “either-or” approach to baptism (it is either a symbol or regeneration); however, in 1947, Hyrum P. Jones pulled the ¿Por qué no los dos? card:

 

. . . baptism is a perfect symbol of the death, burial, and the resurrection of Christ. Paul explains this symbolism in his letter to the Romans (Ch. 6:1-6). Christ died, his body was buried in the tomb, then he took it up again. He was resurrected and came forth from the grave to a new kind of life, His body had been changed, cleansed and purified.

 

What a striking symbol is baptism! After repenting one goes down into the watery grave, completely covered or buried in the water. He is then raised up out of the water, in the likeness of Christ coming forth from the tomb, to walk in newness of life, cleansed and purified from sin.

 

Truly baptism is an appropriate and suitable ordinance. It is the door by which we enter the Church and Kingdom of God, and is required of all. It promotes righteousness and is rich in meaning and symbolism. It is for the remission of sins and is in force through all periods of one’s life, past, present, and future. To realize its greatest blessings one should remember his baptism often and think upon it much. Jesus has given us help in going just this by giving us another ordinance, The Sacrament of the Lord’s Supper. It is by baptism that we take upon us the name of Christ and the obligations of citizenship in his Kingdom. In partaking of the Sacrament we are reminded of Christ’s great gift to us, and of our covenants to always remember him, to keep his commandments which he has given us, that we may always have his spirit to be with us. (Hyrum P. Jones, “Vitalizing Young People’s Participation in the Ordinance of Baptism,” Address given in BYU Faculty Study Group, January 23, 1947, pp. 3-4, Church History Library, Call no.: M266.04 A327 item 23, copy in my possession)

 

 Earlier, a colleague of his went even further. While teaching baptism is a symbol, it also affected, not just our past, but, through repentance, our then-future post-baptismal sins(!):

 

A boy, approached by his teacher because he was disobeying moral laws, feels that he is defeated in life. He has lost hope that God will forgive him for his immoral conduct. He assumes the attitude, "I have the name, I might as well have the game"; and so he continues his practice feeling that all is lost.

 

I would like to say to this young man that we all make mistakes; that we are all sinners. It even says in the scriptures that "there is not a just man upon earth, that doeth good, and sinneth not." God knew that man would sin when good and Evil came into this world; and so in His mercy He provided a way in which all men might be saved from their sins and lifted out of this hopeless pit in which they have found themselves. Jesus came to show mankind that all could be saved by repentance, by a complete change of life; that is, a change so complete that it might be likened to a rebirth. To Nicodemus He said, "A man must be born again."

 

Jesus' life was spent in trying to bring about this rebirth in men and to convince them of the mercy and forgiveness of God. He offered to the woman at the well a fuller life if she would but drink the living waters of the eternal fountain. He said to the woman taken in adultery, "Neither do I condemn thee. Go thy way and sin no more." Could your sin be so great that God would not forgive you when He offered forgiveness to such as these? And when Jesus was on the cross pleading for those who were responsible for His death, saying, "Father forgive them for they know not what they do." Would He not have included you in His mercy and forgiveness? It is not God that is unforgiving. It is always man who is unforgiving. The Scriptures are filled with illustrations of the forgiveness of God.

 

He even established baptism as a symbol that our sins will be forgiven. If baptism were only for the remission of those sins we committed before we were baptized then there would not be much hope, as most of us were baptized when we were eight years of age. However, baptism is for the remission of those sins we commit and repent of after we are baptized, and it is a rebirth to a new way of life to such an extent it functions for righteousness in our lives that the remorse for our sins and repentance which follows keeps us on the road to the mercy and forgiveness of God.

 

The Old Testament Prophet Ezekiel taught the forgiveness of God. He said, "If the wicked man will turn from all the sins which he has committed, and will keep all my statutes, and do what is lawful and right, he shall surely live, and not die. None of the transgressions which he has committed shall be remembered against him; for the righteousness which he has done he shall live............

 

"Repent, then, and turn from all your transgressions; lest your iniquity bring you to ruin. Cast away from you all the transgressions, which you have committed against me; and get yourselves a new heart and a new spirit. (rebirth) Why should you die?........For I have no pleasure in the death of anyone who di.....Turn, then, and live!" (Ezekiel 18:21-22, 30,31,32.)(American Translation) (H. Bartley Heiner, “Mercy and Forgiveness,” Address given in BYU Faculty Study Group, October 11, 1946, p. 1, Church History Library, Call no.: M266.04 A327 item 14, copy in my possession)

 


Further Reading:


Baptism Does Cleanse Us from Our Sins

Friday, October 23, 2026

The Trinity, The Great Apostasy, and "New" Mormonism | Blake Ostler

 

The Trinity, The Great Apostasy, and "New" Mormonism | Blake Ostler






Scriptural Mormonism Podcast Episode 112: Craig Foster on John Taylor's 1886 Revelation

 

Episode 112: Craig Foster on John Taylor's 1886 Revelation







J. Ross Wagner on 1 Corinthians 4:6

  

Building on the insights of Hooker and others, the present study argues that Paul's enigmatic phrase μη υπερ α γεγραπται is best understood in the context of 1 Corinthians 1—4 as a reference to a particular Scriptural admonition — one he has already cited (1.31) and to which he has subsequently alluded (3.21) — namely, 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.' Of the passages quoted by Paul in 1 Corinthians 1-3, it is this citation that best fits the context of 4.6. As a positive command, it is liable to transgression, and so the exhortation not to 'go beyond' the command makes sense. Moreover, the reference to 'boasting' in 1.31 closely connects it with the second ινα clause of 4.6, 'that no one may become puffed up . . .' Finally, as L. L. Welborn observes, only this quotation 'would seem apposite to Paul's warning against factions' in 4.6. (J. Ross Wagner, “’Not Beyond the Things which are Written’: A Call to Boast Only in the Lord (1 Cor 4.6),” New Testament Studies 44, no. 2 [April 1998]: 280)

 

Thursday, October 22, 2026

Richard B. Hays on 1 Corinthians 4:6

  

The phrase “what is written” in Paul always refers to Scripture, and the present sentence is no exception. Paul has prominently spotlighted six Scripture quotations in the first three chapters of the letter (1:19, 31; 2:9, 16; 3:19, 20). In the case of the first two and the last two, the application of the texts is explicitly spelled out: No boasting in human beings. First Corinthians 3:21a links the two quotations in chapter 3 back to the quotations in chapter 1. As we have seen, the wider Old Testament context of each of these quotations reinforces the theme of divine reversal: God confounds the wise, the strong, and the prosperous and raises up the simple, the weak, and the poor. Furthermore, the two quotations in chapter 2, though they are not explicit admonitions against boasting, reinforce the same theme by juxtaposing God’s gracious ways to all human understanding. The cumulative force of these citations is unmistakable: the witness of Scripture places a strict limit on human pride and calls for trust in God alone. What would it mean to go “beyond” (hyper) this witness of Scripture? It would mean, quite simply, to boast in human wisdom by supposing that we are, as it were, smarter than God. (Cf. Rom. 12:3: “For by the grace given to me I say to everyone among you not to think of yourself more highly [hyperphronein] than you ought to think.”) The last clause of 1 Corinthians 4:6 confirms this interpretation. (Richard B. Hays, First Corinthians [Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching; Louisville, Ky.: John Knox Press, 1997], 69)

 

Oliver B. Huntington, Letter (April 12, 1861) and D&C 87 and the Secession of South Carolina

 The following is a transcription of:

 

Letters to Oliver B. Huntington, 1846-1879, Church History Library, Call no.: MS 15664

 

It is a letter dated April 12, 1861, with a continuation dated April 14.

 

Watertown April 12, 1861

 

My Dear Brother:

 

Your kind favor of Feb. 24 & 26 was duly received, the 1st day of April, & as you anticipated, you probably received mine of the 2 of March about the same time, There has nothing of particular interest transpired since my last. I am glad to hear so favorable a report of all the friends, & particularly of W. D. & yourself. You express some fear of a failure of the postal arrangements of the country. And I suppose the "Saints" expect that the Nations, who do not accept the New Covenant,--the Testimony of the Prophet & Seer, Joseph Smith, --& now that of the Church of the Latterday Saints are considered "Gentilez", the "World" and the "Wicked",--& the "Children of the Devil", fit subjects of the "wrath of God", --& that the judgments of God are about to be poured out upon the world & the earth cleansed of wickedness, --And the Church also believe, that they are the True Church, chosen of God--A peculiar people. His chosen people, & now, the real Israel of God, That Mormonism is the work of God,--is True, & that it will increase & spread till it covers the whole earth,--that God has seen their wrongs and said, "it is enough",--that He will be their Avenger & their Father, Is it not so? Tell me if I am mistaken. I think I have heard it taught by the Mormons for 31 years! & nearly the same doctrine taught by the Presbyterians & the Methodists for about 42 years. Very well, Oliver, that is Bible doctrine, I own it, --& the old Jews have the same doctrine, namely, all through the old Testament, that is where the Christians get it.. As we get truth only by investigation, study, research & comparison--it may not injure us to "compare notes" upon these matters. I like to hear your opinions, ideas & belief--as well as those of many others upon all matters, So I will continue to try to give you some of my crude notions upon these and other matters. I hope you will correct my mistakes, for I want to get the truth without regard to any preconceived notions. It is my opinion that such selfish ideas in relation to religion & Theology is but the natural outfroth of a universal feeling implanted in the human constitution & its normal and legitimate use is necessary for the preservation of the race & the development of each individual. --a selfish feeling --a desire to benefit self--to preserve self & then to benefit our friends & as our knowledge & mental capacity increases & expands a desire to benefit our nation & our race--the whole human family. & when the mind is more fully developed--more enlarged & less selfish, as it naturally will be, we shall have larger views--more comprehensive,--more universal.

 

We can then see that every science appears to be based upon universal principles. Every law or principle in physical science appears, to all scholars, to be universal, & no one doubts that all laws & principles in relation to Animals are universal, & no person in this country thinks that God is partial to any race of animals, or has any favorites among them. And is not man as much an animal as a horse or a Monkey or an Aurangoutang! Man is brought into the world in the same manner as animals, He is subject to dissolution--death, in the same manner as the lower animals. These things prove a universal relation between all men and their Creator. God is not an enemy to some men & a friend to others. He is a friend to All.--that is my belief. You will say there is a vast difference between a moral & an immoral man.--very true, & there is a vast difference between a lion & a lamb,--to us,--But will God condemn one to a life of misery & the other to a life happiness because he has given them different constitutions & passions? Because some persons cannot believe in the divinity of the Christian religion, or the Mormon religion or any other religion, will it be just for God to condemn him to endless torment? I consider human moral actions limited to human comprehension or the sphere of human conditions & human reason, Can you conceive of an immoral action performed by any being below man? In this world, does God deal better with the moral man than with the immoral man, except in the mind or soul of each individual? Has God dealt better with or shown any favor or mercy to the Jews? more than their neighboring nations? Has He shown the Mormons or the Christians any particular favor more than any other persons with equal mental & physical constitutions? I have yet to learn that the believers in Christ, or in Joseph Smith, or John Calvin receive any more favors at the hand of their Creator than those who reject them all.

 

I am happy in the belief that when God talks with anyone man He will talk with All, & that He now communicates with all, alike. While all exist in God, I cannot understand how any one can get out side of Him to hear him talk,--or even "see his hinder parts", Am I blame worthy for firmly believing that all revealed religions are but a humbug? Why is it that I feel that I know it is so? Do I not know whether I am honest or not in my desires to know the Truth? Such, are some of my broken ideas. You say that "according to our belief we have been looking a long time for S. Carolina to secede," & also that "Joseph Smith's pointed prediction upon that point . You doubtless know that the same things were talked of before Joseph Smith said or knew anything about it, by hundreds of people, & I know that it was all talked about by the people here at the time he made his prophecy. without involving his predictions.

 

Now why do the Mormons attach so much importance to his prediction?

 

Sunday Apl. 14, Since beginning to write to you I have received a letter from Dimick,--says they are all well but C.A's wife, no news, Last evening Lyman came home from the village and brot the news that "war had begun", You will get the news by the papers before you will this. You may be a little surprised to hear me say that I am glad of it! It is the best news I have heard for a long time° My feelings are up to the fighting point! I hate tyrants, & dispise Tyranny & oppression, as well as, Traitors & robbers. I say "give us freedom or give us death"! This war, this dissolution has long been feared & long been expected, not only the people of this country, but by other nations. The grasp of the Oppressor is never loosed but by the force of power of the oppressed! Let it come! This rebellion of the South, --their Treason, their robberies by Millium, their mobs. Their inhuman treatment to people of the free States & their proscription of the common liberties of free men in a Republic is but the natural outgrowth of the institution of Slavery. You wished my opinion upon this subject & I hope you have not become so contaminated with illiberal principles as to think I have not a right to express my feelings, let them be what they may. I like to hear it from others, that is, I like to hear all express their opinions & feelings, & give their reasons, & when a subject has been well discussed, on all sides truth generally prevails. Those who know their cause is just usually have a stimulus to action & perseverance that others have not. When a difference between parties exist, & the difference is of vast importance & they cannot be reconciled by reason & argument, then they must appeal to Might, & God will certainly help those who best help themselves. I have great confidence in the final triumph of right & justice.

 

I think the Union is dissolved & will not be reunited in our day. The more powerful & popular a government becomes the more liable it is to become corrupt. The great corruption of the last Administration has precipitated the dissolution,--let it go. We shall be in no danger of getting a worse one. You say's is not our nation in an apparent fearful & awful condition?" Certainly it is --but is it in any worse condition, apparently than the Mormons have been? You have come out of your & we shall out of ours. We all have as firm a trust in ourGod as you have in yours. But I am foolish enough to think that mine ie one God over all, and that He is just as friendly to you as me, & as much so to the pagan as to either, I rank myself with the Christians here in this respect,--but I am no more a believer in Christianity than you are in Presbyterianism.

 

Well, Oliver, I have not half answered your, but must close. There has been but little excitement in the Northern States, very little, but thes will be more soon if the war increases so as to call for volunteers.

 

I think you will find that the present administration is not so hostile to Mormons as the last. The main object in sending the army to Utah was to have an excuse for sending an Army to Kansas & give fat jobs to political friends, increasing the patronage & powers of the Administration, That crusade was started by a few political aspirants who wanted to get their names before the public as great sticklers for popular religious opinions. The "times" are good here yet. There is & has been some pressure in the large cities, there has been a great cry, Hay & grain are very plenty. The prospects are, now, favorable for an early spring.

 

O. B. Huntington

 

Affectionately yours

 

Love to all,

 

C. D. H.

 

As to John, he is in good health & his family usually well. He does not save money very fast, but dresses as well any gentleman need to,--makes a good appearance, lives fast, He cares little for corresponding with his Mormon friends. Thinks the leaders are a very wicked set of rascals,--he knows they were when he was with them. --he has no religious belief. Please write as often as you can,--I will try to answer all. Tell W. D. that I wish he would write to me,--I should like to be one his regular correspondents. Good bye., Chauncy

 

(Chauncy D. Huntington)

 

Further Reading:

 

Resources on Joseph Smith's Prophecies

Blog Archive