Wednesday, April 24, 2024

Jared Ortiz and Daniel A. Keating on Creation Ex Nihilo

  

Scripture alone does not clearly resolve the question of the origin of matter. Genesis 1:2, which speaks of “the earth [being] without form and void” and the deep waters, was interpreted by ancient Jews and many early Christians to mean that God created the world from preexisting matter. This is also the consensus of modern biblical scholars. This reading of Genesis seems to be presupposed by the author of the Wisdom of Solomon, who refers to God’s “all-powerful hand, which created the world out of formless matter” (Wis. 11:17). While these passages do not definitely rule out creatio ex nihilo, neither do they confirm it.

 

. . .

 

By the second and third centuries, these texts[2 Maccabees 7:28-29; Rom 4:17; Heb 11:3] were taken as evidence of creatio ex nihilo. Yet these passages were not decisive. The language used here is similar to the philosophical language of the Stoics and the Platonists. These philosophers held that matter always was there and that God gave form to matter, which, because it was formless, did not properly have the status of existing (“to ex-ist” means, literally, “to stand out”). But in light of the challenges of philosophy and Gnosticism, Christianity in the second century asked more clearly about the extent of God’s almighty power and the origin of matter. By working through these challenges, Christians drew out what was implicit in Scripture and their beliefs about God. (Jared Ortiz and Daniel A. Keating, The Nicene Creed: A Scriptural, Historical and Theological Commentary [Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2024], 65-66)

 

Further Reading:

 

Blake T. Ostler, Out of Nothing: A History of Creation ex Nihilo in Early Christian Thought

 

 

Blog Archive