The Lord’s supper is a feast of thanksgiving and joy. In anticipation of the glorious return of Jesus Christ, those assembled celebrate above all the power of the Lord’s death which sustains the community and guarantees peace with God and men (1 Cor. 10:16-17; 11:23-26; Acts 2:42, 46-47; Rev. 30:20-21; cf. Eph 2:14-16). This does not make the eucharist a ceremonial commemoration of a deceased person, and certainly not a burial rite. It is not a past Lord, but the present and coming Lord who is celebrated. It is not the expiration of his rule but the present power of his Spirit that forms the context of the supper. Precisely where demonstrations of the presence of the Spirit are characteristic of a congregation, the celebration of the Lord’s supper stands under God’s Judgment; and the celebrants attest the validity of God’s Judgment; and their acceptance of it. How does this happen? The supper of the Lord tolerates no separation of rich from poor, of strong from weak, of persons who eat everything from ascetics. If a separation does take place, or if a part of the congregation tries to force its view on the others, then Christ’s body and blood are insulted, the community that Christ founded is belied, and the blasphemers come under condemnation. A man can “eat and drink judgment upon himself.” The congregation has the experience that unworthy participation in this feast of love has consequences for morals, for health, and even for life itself. Because the table fellowship belongs to the Judgment of God that is still going on, sickness, weakness, rebukes, humiliations, and even death occur in the congregation. They are God’s “chastisements.” They reveal what it means to dishonour the living, present Lord. (Markus Barth, Justification [Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1971], 72)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2017
(791)
-
▼
October
(86)
- Personal Post: Looking for Employment!
- Selected Excerpts from the Letter of James
- Prime Example of Quote-Mining
- Enos — Wrestling a Man and Seeing God's Face by Ma...
- D&C 124:75 and Gracious Merit
- "Tsimin" in Ancient Maya denoting both "horse" and...
- Amos 9 and "the booth of David"
- Progressive Justification in Galatians
- Adam Clarke on the Contingent Nature of Prophecy
- Lynn Wilder vs. Latter-day Saint (and Biblical) Th...
- Dave Bartosiewicz: Uncritical Apologist for Easter...
- Debunking some YEC "Arguments"
- Transformative Justification in the Odes of Solomon
- Anthony Buzzard's Continued Ignorance of "Mormonism"
- Did the Early Christians Believe in Sola Fide? (No...
- Keith Mathison on the Language of the Last Supper ...
- Critique of "The Christ Who Heals"
- Does Matthew 5:17-18 Teach Inerrancy?
- Dewey M. Beegle on Jeremiah 36
- Parallels between the Instruction of Amenemope and...
- Erastus Snow and Benjamin Winchester on the Effica...
- Responses to some Reformed Proof-Texts and Apologetic
- Walls and Dongell on Ephesians 2:8
- Some tips on becoming an effective apologist
- Quote from Jerome
- "Through Leo has Peter Spoken": Proof of the Papal...
- David Bentley Hart on Matthew 25:46 and the meanin...
- David Bentley Hart's translation of James 2:18-26
- Editors--"Joseph Smith Papers: Documents, vol. 6" ...
- Refuting the Claim that singing the hymn "Praise t...
- What Solid Evidence is there for the Unity of Isaiah?
- Answering a Reformed Critique of LDS Views of Chri...
- An Evening of Eschatology - Piper, Hamilton, Wilso...
- Refuting Douglas Wilson on Water Baptism and Salva...
- Is the Church Ambivalent on the Historicity and An...
- Doug Wilson, Will there be pets in heaven?
- Another Refutation of Mike Thomas on Soteriology
- The Atonement: A Supreme Act of the Love of Christ
- Markus Barth on the Lord's Supper
- James White on Numbers 23:19 and LDS Theology
- The Qur'an and Science
- Papal Infallibility Debate - Robert Sungenis Vs Ja...
- Ben Spackman, Truth, Scripture, and Interpretation
- Fun Anti-Mormon "Facts" Refuted: Joseph Smith, Bri...
- Philip O'Hara on Gnostic Tendencies in Protestant ...
- The Insecurity of the Believer in Reformed Theology
- More Statements from LDS Church Leaders Denying Be...
- Mark Carrier on Isaiah 64:6
- Sola Scriptura as a Dividing Line
- Matthew Levering on "Priesthood Blessings" of the ...
- What did the Sword of Laban look like?
- The Continued Role of Joseph Smith in the Economy ...
- Joseph Fielding Smith on the Testimony of the Holy...
- Early Christians "Cursing" their Enemies
- Brief Note on Patristic Names in Antiquity
- The Church's Portrayal of Brigham Young
- Responding to a Reformed Attempt at Anti-Mormon "B...
- Stephen H. Webb on the Nature of Divine Providence
- Grace: The Most Misunderstood Word in the Bible
- Praise to the Man vs. Marian Prayers and Hymns
- An Examination and Critique of the Theological Pre...
- Blake Ostler on Providence and Prayer
- Barry Bickmore, Joseph Smith Among the Early Chris...
- John Chrysostom vs. the Immaculate Conception
- The Protestant Reformation at 500
- Evidences of the Book of Mormon: Translation
- Kevin Christensen on Dan Vogel's Approach to the B...
- Michael Knowles, Christopher Columbus Actually Was...
- Another Anti-Mormon Double Standard
- Psalm 110:1 and the two Lords in the 1832 First Vi...
- Fan Mail Thursday: On the mentality of some former...
- More problems with Calvinism
- Loraine Boettner on the ahistorical nature of Calv...
- Responding to a critique of Tad Callister's Octobe...
- Dallin H. Oaks' talk at the October 2017 General C...
- "Faith Alone" in Romans 3:28 JST
- Some recent articles, videos, and podcasts
- James White vs. the Bible on an ordained, minister...
- James White Thinks Bad Diarrhea and Mass Shootings...
- John Gee on the Egyptian Context of Abraham 3
- Blake Ostler, The Fallacy of Fundamentalist Assump...
- Some thoughts based on Elder Oaks' Recent Talk at ...
- Roger Olson, When It Comes to Calvinism, Logic Can...
- Daniel Peterson, Evidence for the Book of Abraham
- J. Louis Martyn on Galatians 3:27 and baptism
- Augustine on Faith and Works
-
▼
October
(86)