Friday, October 13, 2017

Philip O'Hara on Gnostic Tendencies in Protestant Theologies

Roman Catholic apologist and former Calvinist, Patrick Seamus O’Hara, wrote the following about the problematic nature of the Protestant concept of being saved by “making a decision for Jesus” and the unbiblical understanding of the nature of the “covenant” concept in eschatological salvation:

Bible Fundamentalists are fond of calling baptism “works salvation.” This misnomer shows their complete lack of understanding of the covenant nature of our relationship to the Lord and how a covenant is made. In Fundamentalism, there is an idea that an action called “making a decision for Jesus” has the full weight of bringing salvation—and thus the unbreakable promise of eternal life—to the individual who goes up the aisle of the Baptist church on Sunday morning. This is not possible, for several reasons:

               1. Making a “decision for Jesus involves no ritual covenant making. There is no instance of anyone ever making a covenant without being personal involved in a ritual in which the principles of the covenant were followed. There must be an act of taking vows and agreeing to the sanctions involved for breaking those vows.

               2. Making a “decision for Jesus” can be done in front of one’s TV set while watching Billy Graham given an invitation to “invite Jesus into your heart.” In such a situation, there is no one watching. But in making a covenant, there must be witnesses to the covenant. Sutton states that the need for witnesses is to bring a covenant lawsuit against anyone who violates the ethics of the covenant. To cut a covenant, three elements are necessary: sanctions, oath, and witnesses (Ray Sutton, “That You May Prosper,” Institute for Christian Economics, June 1987, p. 78).

               3. Making a decision for Jesus does not involve the human body. This is an important consideration for covenant cutting. The whole person is given to the other—body, soul, and spirit. The act of involving our body in covenant making, whether it be in circumcision or in baptism, makes real the fact that we as persons are tripartite beings. To withhold my body from the covenant making ritual is to hold back a part of me. Fundamentalists have a strange and almost semi-Gnostic aversion to anything physical being involved in Christian worship, whether it be the body in baptism or candles, priestly robes, and icons. (Patrick Seamus O’Hara, The Dance of Isaiah: Correcting the Calvinist and Evangelical Understanding of the Biblical Covenant [Fairfax, Va.: Kings of Luighne Publishing, 2011] 119-20, emphasis added)


With respect to the charge of Protestantism (not just “Fundamentalism”) being stained with Gnostic tendencies, such has been admitted, and discussed in some detail, by a Protestant scholar, Philip J. Lee, Against the Protestant Gnostics.

Blog Archive