Yesterday marked the 17th anniversary of one of the best Catholic/Protestant debates in recent years between Robert Sungenis and James R. White on the topic of Papal Infallibility. Fortunately, it is available online:
Papal Infallibility Debate - Robert Sungenis Vs James White
LDS will appreciate this debate as Sungenis' defence of papal infallibility, as defined at Vatican I (1870) is one of the best one will encounter, so if/when one encounters an informed Catholic and this issue is discussed, one will know (1) what the dogma is and (2) how Rome's best defends such.
For those wanting to delve deeper, the following are what I consider to be the best works discussing the Roman Catholic Papacy as well as the dogma of Papal Infallibility from both Catholic and non-Catholic perspectives which I have in my own personal library, see:
Papal Infallibility Debate - Robert Sungenis Vs James White
LDS will appreciate this debate as Sungenis' defence of papal infallibility, as defined at Vatican I (1870) is one of the best one will encounter, so if/when one encounters an informed Catholic and this issue is discussed, one will know (1) what the dogma is and (2) how Rome's best defends such.
For those wanting to delve deeper, the following are what I consider to be the best works discussing the Roman Catholic Papacy as well as the dogma of Papal Infallibility from both Catholic and non-Catholic perspectives which I have in my own personal library, see:
