Tuesday, November 8, 2022

John Duns Scotus (1265/66-1308) vs. Sola Scriptura and the Formal Sufficiency of the Bible

  

Single Question: Whether the supernatural knowledge necessary for the wayfarer is sufficiently handed on in Sacred Scripture.

 

95. The question is asked whether the supernatural knowledge necessary for the wayfarer is sufficiently handed on in Sacred Scripture.

 

That it is not:

 

Because necessary knowledge was never lacking to the human race; Sacred Scripture was not in the law of nature, because Moses first wrote the Pentateuch, nor was the whole of Sacred Scripture in the Mosaic law, but only the Old Testament; therefore etc.

 

96. Again, the more acute in intellect any author of human sciences is, the more he avoids superfluity in handing them on; but in Sacred Scripture there seem to be many superfluous things contained, as the many ceremonies and histories, knowledge of which does not seem necessary for salvation; therefore etc.

 

97. Again, there are many things about which it is not known with certitude from Scripture whether they are sins or not; however knowledge of these things is necessary for salvation, because he who does not know that something is a mortal sin will not avoid it sufficiently; therefore etc.

 

98. On the contrary: Augustine in City of God XI ch. 3 says, speaking of canonical Scripture: “We have faith in it for things that it is not expedient to be ignorant of and that we are not suited to know by ourselves.” (John Duns Scotus, The Ordinatio of Blessed John Dun Scotus, Volume 1: On Revelation and Theology [Militant Thomist Press, 2022], 50-51)

 

 Further Reading:


Yves Congar on Medieval Writers and the Material Sufficiency of Scripture


Not by Scripture Alone: A Latter-day Saint Refutation of Sola Scriptura

Blog Archive