Sunday, May 5, 2024

William Symington (1795-1862) Desperate Attempt to Explain 2 Peter 2:1 in light of his Reformed Theology

  

‘But there were false prophets among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that brought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.’ Some are of opinion that ‘the Lord’ here does not refer to Christ; and certainly the original term (δεσποτην) is not that by which the Saviour is commonly designated. Others, again, think that by which the Saviour is commonly designated. Others, again, think that by which the Saviour is commonly designated. Others, again, think that the buying here does not refer to the meritorious purchase which Christ made of the church with his blood, but to the redemption from Egypt or some other thing of inferior importance. But we are willing to admit that Christ is ‘the Lord’ spoken of, and that the purchase of redemption by his blood is what is meant by the word ‘brought:’ and yet we see nothing in the text that opposes our doctrine. It is not necessary to suppose that the false teachers who were to bring on themselves swift destruction, were actually bought with the blood of Christ. It is enough from the apostle’s purpose that they were professedly so. He argues again them on their own principles, and shows thus that their conduct was heinous and dangerous in the extreme. And in doing so, he only follows the example of the Saviour himself, who confuted the Pharisees who professed to be righteous and were not, on their own acknowledged principles:--‘I say unto you, that likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repeneth, more than over ninety and nine just persons which need no repentance.’ Are we to conclude, from this, that there were any such just persons who needed no repentance? Surely not; but there were persons who made pretensions to this character; and again these was the reproof contained in the passage directed. Neither are we, from the expression under consideration, to conclude that the persons spoken of were actually ‘bought’ with the price of Christ’s blood; but there were persons who pretended to be so and yet acted inconsistently with the supposition; and such pretension certainly tended to enhance the enormity of their guilt. (William Symington, On the Atonement and Intercession of Jesus Christ [West Linn, Oreg.: Monergism Books, 2024], 235-26)

 

Blog Archive