Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Theophylact of Ohrid (1055-1107) on Hebrews 10:26-29

  

Hebrews 10:26. For if we sin willfully after we have received the knowledge of truth,

 

From the most beneficial, he convinced them that we have boldness, that we are granted forgiveness and now he frightens with the most sorrowful thing. See how he is compassionate. “If we sin willfully,” he says—as if to say, if one sins not involuntarily, there is a certain moderate forgiveness. Note also: he did not say “sinned,” but “sin”—that is, persist in sin unrepentantly. Thus, if we do not remain in sin, but show repentance, there will be forgiveness. So, where are those who say that repentance is here rejected? “Having received the knowledge of the truth”—he means either of Christ or of all the doctrines.

 

there no longer remains a sacrifice of sins,

 

He says this not to reject repentance, as some have falsely devised, but to show that there is no second baptism, and thus no second death of Christ. He calls Christ’s death a sacrifice, as in the following verses. For by one sacrifice He perfected forever: our baptism portrays Christ’s death. Therefore, as that death was one, so also baptism one. So then, why do you sin so fearlessly, when there is no hope that you can easily wash away sins again through baptism. Therefore, instead, engage in good deeds.

 

Hebrews 10:27. but a certain fearful expectation of judgment, and fiery indignation, which will devour the adversaries.

 

See how he almost personifies the fire. Just as an enraged beast does not rest until it has seized and devoured someone to satisfy its fury, so also that fire, as if kindled by zeal against the breakers of God’s commandments and raging on their account, seizes and forever devours whoever it takes. For he did not say: “ready to consume” but “to devour”—evidently, eternally. “Adversaries” he calls not only unbelievers, but also believers who act against God’s commandments.

 

Hebrews 10:28. Anyone who has rejected Moses’ law

 

From the lesser he proves the justice of the coming punishment, so that his words may gain more belief. He calls the law Moses’, because he established much.

 

dies without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. (Deuteronomy 17:6)

 

The connection of the speech is this: if anyone rejected the law of Moses, then upon the testimony of two or three witnesses, “he dies without mercy”—that is, if it was declared by two or three that he broke the law.

 

Hebrews 10:29. Of how much worse punishment, do you suppose, he will be thought worthy who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, and counted the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified a common thing.

 

He hands the judgment over to them, which is what we usually do regarding universally acknowledged truths—making the hearers the judges. What does “trampled” mean? That is, despised. Just as we count despicable people as nothing, so we treat Christ as nothing—and thus come to sin. “And has counted the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified a common thing”—that is, considers it no better than anything else. “Of the covenant,” because by it the covenant was established with us, granting us an inheritance of blessings, as we said above. This is said of the Mysteries. For when we, partaking of the Most Pure Body and Blood, plunge the flesh that received the Mysteries into the filth of carnal uncleanness—do we not thereby trample the Son of God? The dust of the earth is not so unworthy of the Divine Body as is uncleanness. Use this also against the Nestorians. They, considering Christ a mere man, deem His Blood impure, no different from other blood.

 

by which he was sanctified

 

Here he shows insensibility and ingratitude. For, he says, one should treat with fear the sanctification he received through the Blood.

 

and insulted the Spirit of grace?

 

For he who unworthily uses the gift insults the Giver. Did He not make you a son of God? Yet you become a salve of passions. Did He not come to dwell in you? Yet you invite the devil into yourself. Is this not an insult to the Spirit? (The New Testament Commentaries of Saint Theophylact of Ohrid, 3 vols. [trans. Dean Marais; Based Books, 2025], 3:248-49)

 

Blog Archive