Thursday, May 28, 2020

The Human Element in the Inspiration and Inscripturation of Revelation

Commenting on how Scripture is not human merely or divine merely¸ but both, Dummelow wrote:

 

The Human Element. This can be recognised (a) in the cooperation of human minds with the mind of the Holy Ghost. The Psalmist who unburdened his soul in Ps 51 must have been deeply conscious that he was himself imploring forgiveness, and like other humble saints may have been scarcely aware that the Divine Spirit was prompting his prayer. In the same way the prophets were perhaps often unaware of the full divine meaning which God intended heir words to bear ultimately. When the Psalmist says, ‘They pierced my hands and my feet’ and when Hosea says, ‘When Israel was a child then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt,’ we need not suppose that they were at all conscious that their words would correspond with the experiences of the Messiah.

 

The human element can be recognised (b) in the materials employed by the sacred writers, and in the manner in which they are combined. The writers used various sources of information as modern writers do. Thus in Nu 2114 we find a reference to a ‘Book of the Wars of the Lord,’ and in Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles several documents are quoted. Even in the New Testament the writers felt at liberty to rearrange or modify earlier inspired writings felt at liberty to rearrange or modify earlier inspired writings, for St. Luke and St. Matthew both appear to have absorbed much of St. Mark’s Gospel, and St. Luke has endeavoured to make the Greek more elegant. (J.R. Dummelow, A Commentary on the Holy Bible [London: Macmillan and Co., 1909], cxxii)

 

Elsewhere we read:

 

THE DIVINE AND HUMAN IN THE BIBLE

 

There are two answers. First, that in the Bible and divine and human are blended . . . We must not regard the Bible as an absolutely perfect book in which God is Himself the author using human hands and brains only as a man might use a typewriter. God used men, not machines—men with like weakness and prejudice and passion as ourselves, though purified and ennobled by the influence of His Holy Spirit; men each with his own peculiarities of manner and disposition—each with his own education or want of education—each with his own way of looking at things—each influenced differently from another by the different experiences and disciple of his life. Their inspiration did not involve a suspension of their natural faculties; it did not destroy their personality, nor abolish the differences of training and character; it did not even make them perfectly free from earthly passion; it did not make them into machines—it left them men.

 

Therefore we find their knowledge sometimes no higher than that of their contemporaries, and their indignation against oppression and wrong-doing sometimes breaking out into desire of revenge. This would not surprise us in the least in other good men who were we knew striving after God and righteousness. It surprises us in the Bible, because of our false preconceptions; because it is in the Bible we do not expect the actors to be real and natural; because of our false theory of Verbal Inspiration we are puzzled when the divine is mingled with the human. We must learn that the divine is mingled with the human.

 

We cannot draw a line between the divine and the human. We cannot say of any part, ‘This is divine,’ or ‘This is human.’ In some parts, as the Gospels, there is more of the divine; in others, as the Chronicles, more of the human. It is as a mine of precious ore where the gold is mingled with the rock and clay—the ore is richer in one part than another, but all parts in some degree are glittering with gold. It is as sunlight through a painted window—the light must come to us coloured by the medium—we cannot get in any other way. In some parts the medium is denser and more imperfect, in others the golden glory comes dazzlingly through. It is foolish to ignore the existence of the human medium through which the light has come; it is still more foolish to ignore the divine light, and think that the tinted dome is luminous itself, that the light of heaven has only come from earth. Both must be kept in mind—the divine and the human—if the Bible is to be rightly understood. (Ibid., cxxxiv-cxxv)

 

For a modern scholarly discussion of the “Incarnational” model of biblical inspiration, see:

 

Peter Enns, Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament


Blog Archive