Critiquing the Protestant belief that
faith is “passive” and “merely receptive,” Robert C. Koons wrote:
Lutherans insist that
faith is a mere organ by which we receive Christ’s righteousness. This begs the
question: why must this organ of receptivity be identified with faith alone,
and not with “faith working in love,” or even with faith, regeneration, and the
fruit that naturally flows from these? For example, Robert Preus writes, “If
justification is declared freely (dorean, gratis) over the sinner by God’s
grace (Romans 3:24), then only faith is left to justify” (Preus, Justification
and Rome, 97). This is a non sequitur. If justification is free, how can
anything be “left to justify”? If faith can justify despite our being justified
“freely,” then why is it impossible that it is faith and love together that do
the justifying, so long as both are free gifts of God for Christ’s sake? (Robert
C. Koons, A Lutheran’s Case for Roman Catholicism [Eugene, Oreg.: Cascade
Books, 2020], 31)
On Rom 3:31-26, a common “proof-text” to
support this doctrine, Koons noted:
This passage is
silent on whether this righteousness, which comes to us from God through faith
in Christ, is internal or external, inherent or “alien.” It is silent, further,
on the question of whether this righteousness is received in toto, all
at once, or whether the believer can be expected to grow from one degree of
righteousness to another. Nor does the passage speak to the question of whether
such growth (if it is required) depends only on the believer’s faith, or
whether the believer cooperates in that growth through subsequent actions. Even if the believer uses the law to guide
him in this cooperation with God’s Spirit, this would not nullify the fact that
God’s righteousness came to him initially apart from the law. What Paul is
condemning is the use of the law by the autonomous, self-righteous sinner as a
means for manipulating or controlling God, placing God under an obligation to
accept as he is, without receiving Christ’s righteousness through faith.
According to Paul, we
are justified freely by God’s grace, implying that there is nothing that we can
do, prior to our conversion to faith, that could be thought of as earning that
grace or mitigating the guilt of our sinfulness. In this sense, righteousness
comes to us “apart from law”: no conformity to the law is a prerequisite to the
initial reception of God’s grace.
Paul makes it clear
that faith is the first point of contact between the sinner and God’s grace: it
is to the believer in Christ that the righteousness of God is freely given. (Ibid.,
118-19)
To be fair to Koons, he is being too generous to the Protestant interpretation of this pericope. It is eisegetical to the extreme. With respect to other instances of δικαι-words, consider the following from a leading scholar of Pauline New Testament texts and theology whose work has refuted the concept Paul taught forensic justification:
Further Reading
Response to a Recent Attempt to Defend Imputed Righteousness
An Examination and Critique of the Theological Presuppositions Underlying Reformed Theology