Monday, March 21, 2022

Allen Johnson on the 1860 U.S. Elections and Stephen A. Douglas

  

On the face of the election returns, Douglas made a sorry showing; he had won the electoral vote of but a single State, Missouri, though three of the seven electoral votes of New Jersey fell to him as the result of fusion. yet as the popular vote in the several States was ascertained, defeat wore the guise of a great personal triumph. Leader of a forlorn hope, he had yet received the suffrages of 1,376,957 citizens, only 489,495 less votes than Lincoln had polled. Of these, 163,525 came from the South, while Lincoln received only 26,430 all from the border slave States. As compared with the vote of Breckinridge and Bell at the South, Douglas's vote was insignificant; but at the North, he ran far ahead of the combined vote of both. It goes without saying that had Douglas secured the full Democratic vote in the free States, he would have pressed Lincoln hard in many quarters. From the national standpoint, the most significant aspect of the popular vote was the failure of Breckinridge to secure a majority in the slave States. Union sentiment was still stronger than the secessionists had boasted. The next most significant fact in the history of the election was this: Abraham Lincoln had been elected to the presidency by the vote of a section which had given over a million votes to his rival, the leader of a faction of a disorganized party. (Allen Johnson, Stephen A. Douglas: A Study in American Politics [New York: The Macmillan Company, 1908], 440-41)

 

Further Reading


Jeff Lindsay, "The Stephen A. Douglas Prophecy," in Mormon Answers: Fulfilled Prophecies of Joseph Smith


FAIR, Timing of Stephen A. Douglas prophecy


Resources on Joseph Smith's Prophecies

Blog Archive