According to one of the most disingenuous and dimmest critics of the Church (some, myself included, call him the Ralph Wiggum of anti-Mormonism):
Joseph
Smith is unquestionably a False Prophet according to the Biblical Criteria.
Remember, you only have to fail one of these four tests to qualify as a False
Prophet.
Of course, this critic is guilty of eisegesis and misrepresentation of all 4 tests of a prophet, but let us focus on the test focusing on fulfillment of prophecy. If he were to be consistent (which would be a novelty for him), then he would have to conclude that Micah was a false prophet.
In Mic 3:12, we read the following prophecy:
Therefore
shall Zion for your sake be plowed as a field, and Jerusalem shall become
heaps, and the mountain of the house as the high places of the forest.
That this was a failed prediction
is confirmed by none other than the prophet Jeremiah who offers an apologetic
for its non-fulfillment (like how LDS apologists offer an apologetic for
purportedly unfulfilled prophecies of Joseph Smith):
Micah
the Morasthite prophesied in the days of Hezekiah king of Judah, and spake to
all the people of Judah, saying, Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Zion shall be
plowed like a field, and Jerusalem shall become heaps, and the mountain of the
house as the high places of a forest. Did Hezekiah king of Judah and all Judah
put him at all to death? did he not fear the Lord, and besought the Lord, and
the Lord repented him of the evil which he had pronounced against them? Thus
might we procure great evil against our souls. (Jer 26:18-19)
Consider also the following from commentaries:
The quotation of Micah 3:12 in Jeremiah 26:18 introduces a new element with which to assess the authenticity of Jeremiah. The destruction of Jerusalem, prophesied by Micah, had moved Hezekiah and the people to turn to the Lord, causing his repentance (v. 19). (Benedetta Rossi, “Jeremiah,” in The Jerome Biblical Commentary for the Twenty-First Century, ed. John J. Collins, Gina Hens-Piazza, Barbara Reid, and Donal Senior [3d ed.; London: T&T Clark, 2022], 915)
[Mic
3:12] provides the only unambiguous instance of the Hebrew Bible of a prophetic
message being specifically referred to in another prophetic collection, for it
is discussed in Jer. 26:18-19. Jerusalem had not fallen; but this does not mean
that Micah was dismissed or condemned as a false prophet on the grounds that
his prophecy had not been fulfilled. Rather, the claim is made that Hezekiah's
repentance had led Yahweh to change his mind and spare the city, and such a
claim cannot readily be refuted. For those accepted as being within the true
prophetic succession ideological support could be provided, and non-fulfilment
of a particular prophecy was not an insuperable barrier for those who were so accepted.
(Richard J. Coggins, “Prophecy—True and False,” in Of Prophets’ Visions and the Wisdom of Sages:
Essays in Honor of R. Norman Whybray on his Seventieth Birthday, ed. Heather A.
McKay and David J. A. Clines [Journal for the Study of the Old Testament
Supplement Series 162; Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1993], 90)
Micah is unquestionably a False Prophet according to the Biblical Criteria. Remember, you only have to fail one of these four tests to qualify as a False Prophet. Micah clearly failed the test concerning the fulfillment of prophecy.
